Abstract
Multi-frequency technique is expected to be widely adopted with the new generations of global navigation satellite system, which is anticipated to benefit ambiguity resolution (AR). Three-carrier AR (TCAR) is a classical AR method based on triple-frequency observations, which is efficient for AR of short baseline. However, this method ignores the residual ionospheric delay, which degrades the reliability in active ionosphere situations and reduces the success of AR for medium and long baselines. We investigate the classical TCAR method and identify the major deficiency that hampers its application, especially to medium and long baselines. To improve this algorithm, the second and third steps of the classical TCAR are modified accordingly. In step 2, the ambiguity-resolved extra-wide-lane (EWL) combination and three pseudorange observations are employed to eliminate or reduce the residual ionospheric delay, in addition to the geometry term. In step 3, besides the EWL combination and pseudoranges, the ambiguity-resolved wide-lane (WL) combination is used to completely eliminate the ionosphere and geometry terms. The combination coefficients of these pseudoranges and combinations are optimized to minimize the noise of the ambiguity estimates. In order to assess the performances, real triple-frequency observations of BeiDou navigation system of baselines with different lengths are processed by the two methods. Results show that, the classical TCAR method is very sensitive to ionospheric delay and limited to short baseline application, while the modified TCAR method is free from ionospheric delay and can be applied to AR of median and long baselines. For WL AR, the modified TCAR method shows a comparable performance with the classical TCAR method, and a better performance can be expected when the baseline becomes longer, e.g., from 100s to 1,000s kilometers. For narrow-lane AR, the modified TCAR method performs much better than the classical TCAR method for median and long baselines.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Cocard M, Bourgon S, Kamali O, Collins P (2008) A systematic investigation of optimal carrier-phase combinations for modernized triple-frequency GPS. J Geod 82(9):555–564. doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0201-x
De Jonge PJ, Teunissen PJG, Jonkman NF, Joosten P (2000) The distributional dependence of the range on triple frequency GPS ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of the ION NTM 2000, 26–28 January, Anaheim, CA, pp 605–612
Feng Y (2008) GNSS three carrier ambiguity resolution using ionosphere-reduced virtual signals. J Geod 82(12):847–862. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0209-x
Forssell B, Martin-Neira M, Harrisz RA (1997) Carrier phase ambiguity resolution in GNSS-2. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS-97, 16–19 September, Kansas City, MO, pp 1727–1736
Hatch R (1982) The synergism of GPS code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on satellite Doppler positioning at physical sciences laboratory of New Mexico State University, February 8–12, vol 2, pp 1213–1231
Hatch R, Jung J, Enge P, Pervan B (2000) Civilian GPS: the benefits of three frequencies. GPS Solut 3(4):1–9. doi:10.1007/PL00012810
Henkel P, Günther C (2012) Reliable integer ambiguity resolution: multi-frequency code carrier linear combinations and statistical a priori knowledge of attitude. Navigation 59(1):61–75. doi:10.1002/navi.6
Ji S, Chen W, Zhao C et al (2007) Single epoch ambiguity resolution for Galileo with the CAR and LAMBDA methods. GPS Solut 11(4):259–268. doi:10.1007/s10291-007-0057-9
Jung J, Enge P, Pervan B (2000) Optimization of cascade integer resolution with three civil GPS frequencies. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS-2000, Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, UT, pp 2191–2200
Li B, Feng Y, Shen Y (2010) Three carrier ambiguity resolution: distance-independent performance demonstrated using semi-generated triple frequency GPS signals. GPS Solut 14(2):177–184. doi:10.1007/s10291-009-0131-6
Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, ML, pp 373–386
Shi C, Zhao Q, Hu Z, Liu J (2013) Precise relative positioning using real tracking data from COMPASS GEO and IGSO satellites. GPS Solut 17(1):103–119. doi:10.1007/s10291-012-0264-x
Tang W, Deng C, Shi C, Liu J (2013) Triple-frequency carrier ambiguity resolution for Beidou navigation satellite system. GPS Solut 18(3):335–344. doi:10.1007/s10291-013-0333-9
Teunissen P, Joosten P, Tiberius C (2002) A comparison of TCAR, CIR and LAMBDA GNSS ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS, 24–27 September, Portland, OR, pp 2799–2808
Vollath U, Birnbach S, Landau H et al (1998) Analysis of three-carrier ambiguity resolution (TCAR) technique for precise relative positioning in GNSS-2. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS, pp 417–426
Wang K, Rothacher M (2013) Ambiguity resolution for triple-frequency geometry-free and ionosphere-free combination tested with real data. J Geod 87(6):539–553. doi:10.1007/s00190-013-0630-7
Werner W, Winkel J (2003) TCAR and MCAR options with Galileo and GPS. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS/GNSS 2003, 9–12 September, Portland, OR, pp 790–800
Wübbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI 4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, ML, pp 403–412
Acknowledgments
This study has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41231174). The authors express their sincere gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Q., Dai, Z., Hu, Z. et al. Three-carrier ambiguity resolution using the modified TCAR method. GPS Solut 19, 589–599 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0421-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0421-5