Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

A process mining-based analysis of business process work-arounds

  • Special Section Paper
  • Published:
Software & Systems Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Business process work-arounds are specific forms of incompliant behavior, where employees intentionally decide to deviate from the required procedures although they are aware of them. Detecting and understanding the work-arounds performed can guide organizations in redesigning and improving their processes and support systems. Existing process mining techniques for compliance checking and diagnosis of incompliant behavior rely on the available information in event logs and emphasize technological capabilities for analyzing this information. They do not distinguish intentional incompliance and do not address the sources of this behavior. In contrast, the paper builds on a list of generic types of work-arounds found in practice and explores whether and how they can be detected by process mining techniques. Results obtained for four work-around types in five real-life processes are reported. The remaining two types are not reflected in events logs and cannot be currently detected by process mining. The detected work-around data are further analyzed for identifying correlations between the frequency of specific work-around types and properties of the processes and of specific activities. The analysis results promote the understanding of work-around situations and sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aalst, WMPvd: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aalst, WMPvd, Adriansyah, A., Dongen, B.F.V.: Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2, 182–192 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aalst, W.M.P.v.d., Beer, H.T.d., Dongen, B.F.v.: Process mining and verification of properties: An approach based on temporal logic. In: OTM Conferences 2005. LNCS, vol. 3760, pp. 130–147. Springer, Berlin (2005)

  4. Aalst, W.M.P.v.d.: Business alignment: using process mining as a tool for delta analysis. In Grundspenkis, J., Kirikova, M. (eds.) Proceedings of BPMDS’04, volume 2 of Caise’04 Workshops, pp. 138–145 (2004)

  5. Aalst, WMPvd, Schonenberg, M.H., Song, M.: Time prediction based on process mining. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 450–475 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdullah, N.S., Sadiq, S.W., Indulska, M.: Information systems research: aligning to industry challenges in management of regulatory compliance. In: PACIS 2010. p. 36. AISeL (2010)

  7. Adriansyah, A., Dongen, B.F.v., Aalst, W.M.P.v.d.: Towards robust conformance checking. In: BPI 2010. LNBIP, vol. 66, pp. 122–133. Springer (2011)

  8. Adriansyah, A., Sidorova, N., Dongen, B.F.v.: Cost-based fitness in conformance checking. In: ACSD 2011. pp. 57–66. IEEE (2011)

  9. Adriansyah, A., Dongen, B.F.v., Aalst, W.M.P.v.d.: Conformance checking using cost-based fitness analysis. In: EDOC 2011. pp. 55–64. IEEE (2011)

  10. Calders, T., Guenther, C., Pechenizkiy, M., Rozinat, A.: Using minimum description length for process mining. In: SAC 2009. pp. 1451–1455. ACM Press (2009)

  11. De Weerdt, J., De Backer, M., Vanthienen, J, Baesens, B.: A critical evaluation of model-log metrics in process discovery. In: BPM 2010 Workshops, Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Business Process Intelligence (BPI2010), LNBIP vol. 66, pp. 158–169. Springer, Berlin (2011)

  12. Fahland, D., de Leoni, M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking of interacting processes with overlapping instances. In: BPM. LNCS vol. 6896, pp. 345–361 (2011)

  13. Kharbili, M.E., Medeiros, A.K.A.d., Stein, S., Aalst, W.M.P.v.d.: Business process compliance checking: current state and future challenges. In: MobIS 2008. LNI, vol. 141, pp. 107–113. GI (2008)

  14. Kharbili, M.: Business process regulatory compliance management solution frameworks: a comparative evaluation. In: APCCM 2012. CRPIT, vol. 130, pp. 23–32. ACS (2012)

  15. Ly, L.T., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Rinderle-Ma, S., Aalst, W.M.P.v.d.: A framework for the systematic comparison and evaluation of compliance monitoring approaches. In: Proceedings of 17th IEEE International EDOC Conference (2013)

  16. Montali, M., Pesic, M., Aalst, WMPvd, Chesani, F., Mello, P., Storari, S.: Declarative specification and verification of service choreographies. ACM Trans. Web 4(1), 1–62 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J.: A fresh look at precision in process conformance. In: BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 211–226. Springer (2010)

  18. Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J.: Enhancing precision in process conformance: stability, confidence and severity. In: CIDM 2011. IEEE (2011)

  19. Outmazgin, N.: Exploring workaround situations in business processes, In: BPM 2012 Workshop Proceedings, LNBIP 132, pp. 426–437. Springer (2013)

  20. Outmazgin, N., Soffer, P.: Business process workarounds: what can and cannot be detected by process mining. In: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, LNBIP 147, pp 48–62. Springer (2013)

  21. Phua, C., Lee, V., Smith, K., Gayler, R.: A comprehensive survey of data mining-based fraud detection research (2010). arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.6119

  22. Poelmans, S.: Coping strategies and distributed viscosity in a workflow management system: a case study. In: Workshop on Adaptive Workflow Systems (1998)

  23. Poelmans, S.: Workarounds and distributed viscosity in a workflow system: a case study. ACM SIGGROUP Bull. 20(3), 11–12 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramezani, E., Fahland, D., Aalst, W.M.P.v.d.: Where Did I Misbehave? Diagnostic information in compliance checking. In: BPM 2012. LNCS 7481, pp. 262–278. Springer (2012)

  25. Ramezani, E., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M.: Supporting Domain Experts to Select and Configure Precise Compliance Rules, Working paper (2013)

  26. Ramezani, E., Fahland, D., van Dongen, B., Aalst, W.M.P.v.d.: Diagnostic information for compliance checking of temporal compliance requirements. In: Proceedings of CAiSE 2013, Springer (2013)

  27. Ramezani, E., Fahland, D., Werf, J.M.E.M.v.d., Mattheis, P.: Separating compliance management and business process management. In: BPM Workshops 2011. LNBIP, vol. 100, pp. 459–464. Springer (2012)

  28. Rozinat, A., Aalst, WMPvd: Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Inf. Syst. 33(1), 64–95 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Song, M., Aalst, WMPvd: Towards comprehensive support for organizational mining. Decis. Support Syst. 46(1), 300–317 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vardi, Y., Weitz, E.: Misbehavior in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Management. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pnina Soffer.

Additional information

Communicated by Dr. Selmin Nurcan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Outmazgin, N., Soffer, P. A process mining-based analysis of business process work-arounds. Softw Syst Model 15, 309–323 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-014-0420-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-014-0420-6

Keywords

Navigation