Abstract
Patients who are intubated with endotracheal tubes often receive chest x-ray (CXR) imaging to determine whether the tube is correctly positioned. When these CXRs are interpreted by a radiologist, they evaluate whether the tube needs to be repositioned and typically provide a measurement in centimeters between the endotracheal tube tip and carina. In this project, a large dataset of endotracheal tube and carina bounding boxes was annotated on CXRs, and a machine-learning model was trained to generate these boxes on new CXRs and to calculate a distance measurement between the tube and carina. This model was applied to a gold standard annotated dataset, as well as to all prospective data passing through our radiology system for two weeks. Inter-radiologist variability was also measured on a test dataset. The distance measurements for both the gold standard dataset (mean error = 0.70 cm) and prospective dataset (mean error = 0.68 cm) were noninferior to inter-radiologist variability (mean error = 0.70 cm) within an equivalence bound of 0.1 cm. This suggests that this model performs at an accuracy similar to human measurements, and these distance calculations can be used for clinical report auto-population and/or worklist prioritization of severely malpositioned tubes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data is in the author’s possession and is not publicly available.
Code Availability
Code is in the author’s possession and is not publicly available.
References
Varshney M, Sharma K, Kumar R, Varshney PG: Appropriate depth of placement of oral endotracheal tube and its possible determinants in Indian adult patients. Indian J Anaesth 2011. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.89880
Han JH, Lee SH, Kang YJ, Kang JM: Plain endotracheal tube insertion carries greater risk for malpositioning than does reinforced endotracheal tube insertion in females. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.65.6S.S23
Hossein-Nejad H, Payandemehr P, Bashiri SA, Nedai HHN: Chest radiography after endotracheal tube placement: is it necessary or not? Am J Emerg Med 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2013.04.032
Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 2011.
Redmon J, Farhadi A. Yolov3. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.690
Redmon J, Farhadi A: YOLO v.3. Tech Rep 2018.
Campbell MJ, Gardner MJ: Statistics in medicine: calculating confidence intervals for some non-parametric analyses. Br Med J Clin Res Ed 1988. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.296.6634.1454
Walker E, Nowacki AS: Understanding equivalence and noninferiority testing. J Gen Intern Med 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1513-8
Lakhani P: Deep convolutional neural networks for endotracheal tube position and X-ray image classification: challenges and opportunities. J Digit Imaging. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9980-7
Frid-Adar M, Amer R, Greenspan H: Endotracheal tube detection and segmentation in chest radiographs using synthetic data. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32226-7_87
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
All authors are employed at the teleradiology practice described here.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, R.J., Baginski, S.G., Bronstein, Y. et al. Measurement of Endotracheal Tube Positioning on Chest X-Ray Using Object Detection. J Digit Imaging 34, 846–852 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00495-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00495-6