Abstract
An automatic method for cartilage segmentation using knee MRI images is described. Three binary classifiers with integral and partial pixel features are built using the Bayesian theorem to segment the femoral cartilage, tibial cartilage and patellar cartilage separately. First, an iterative procedure based on the feedback of the number of strong edges is designed to obtain an appropriate threshold for the Canny operator and to extract the bone-cartilage interface from MRI images. Second, the different edges are identified based on certain features, which allow for different cartilage to be distinguished synchronously. The cartilage is segmented preliminarily with minimum error Bayesian classifiers that have been previously trained. According to the cartilage edge and its anatomic location, the speed of segmentation is improved. Finally, morphological operations are used to improve the primary segmentation results. The cartilage edge is smooth in the automatic segmentation results and shows good consistency with manual segmentation results. The mean Dice similarity coefficient is 0.761.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kapur T: Model Based Three Dimensional Medical Image Segmentation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1999, pp 54–70
Ghosh S, Beuf O, Ries M, Lane NE, Steinbach LS, Link TM, Majumdar S: Watershed Segmentation of High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images of Articular Cartilage of the Knee. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE 4, 2000, pp 3174–3176
Folkesson J: Segmenting Articular Cartilage Automatically Using a Voxel Classification Approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:106–115, 2007
Zhang K: Segmenting Human Knee Cartilage Automatically From Multi-contrast MRI Images Using Support Vector Machines and Discriminative Random Fields. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2011, pp 721–724
Fripp J: Automatic Segmentation and Quantitative Analysis of the Articular Cartilages From Magnetic Resonance Images of the Knee. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:56–65, 2010
Tejos C, Hall L D, Cardenas-Blanco A: Segmentation of Articular Cartilage Using Active Contours and Prior Knowledge. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE 1, 2004, pp 1648–1651
Chi Y: Automatic Segmentation of Cartilage in MR Images using CDCG: Chessboard Directional Compensated GVF Snakes. Medical Information Visualisation-BioMedical Visualisation (MediVis 2006), 2006, pp 45–50
Canny J: A Computational Approach to Edge Detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI-8:679–698, 1986
Huo YK, Wei G, Zhang YD, Wu LN: An Adaptive Threshold for the Canny Operator of Edge Detection. International Conference on Image Analysis and Signal Processing (IASP), 2010, pp 371–374
Harris C, Stephens M: A combined corner and edge detector. Proceedings of the 4th Alvey Vision Conference, 1988, pp 147–151
Protter, Murray H, Morrey Jr, Charles B: College Calculus with Analytic Geometry, 2nd edition. Addison-Wesley, LCCN, 1970, pp 520
Friedman JH: Another Approach to Polyehotomous Classification, Technical report, Stanford University, From:http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~jhf/, 1996
Rish, Irina: An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Empirical Methods in Artificial Intelligence, 2001
Folkesson J, Dam E, Fogh Olsen O, Pettersen P, Christiansen C: Automatic segmentation of the articular cartilage in knee MRI using a hierarchical multi-class classification scheme. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv (MICCAI 2005) 327–334, 2005
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61190122/F0205) and the Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC (cstc2011jjA10032).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Jianfei Pang and PengYue Li contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pang, J., Li, P., Qiu, M. et al. Automatic Articular Cartilage Segmentation Based on Pattern Recognition from Knee MRI Images. J Digit Imaging 28, 695–703 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9780-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9780-x