Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The PBC model: promoting positive behaviours through change-based interventions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Any behaviour that deviates from the social norms of a wider society and is viewed negatively by society as a whole is considered to be a behavioural problem. In office environments, there is a significant prevalence of behaviour problems, and they have a long-lasting impact on work productivity. Intervention provision is a current component of behavioural problem-solving strategies from which people may benefit through smart environments. While many interventions are presently employed in both smart and non-smart environments, it is unknown how well they work in relation to user preferences. Additionally, change levels are not the foundation of the present intervention methods. The study looked into how providing interventions can help smart environment users to promote good behaviour. The study used the Design Science Research (DSR) Methodology's rigour cycle to deploy the Generic User Model and the Positive Behaviour Change (PBC) model. The PBC Model was examined through an artificial-summative evaluation. The results of the artificial-summative evaluation showed that change-based interventions can be effective for reducing inappropriate behaviour and increasing positive behaviour, and that input from user models can give intervention users personalised effects. The implication of the results from this study is that intervention providers do not only need to focus on modifying negative behaviours, but also strengthening and sustaining good behaviours to motivate continuous future occurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The simulated data used in this research is not publicly available at the moment.

References

  • Acuña ST, Castro JW, Juristo N (2012) A HCI technique for improving requirements elicitation. Inf Softw Technol 54(12):1357–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamo EK, Wu J, Wolery M, Hemmeter ML, Ledford JR, Barton EE (2015) Using video modeling, prompting, and behavior-specific praise to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for young children with Down syndrome. J Early Interv 37(4):270–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adewoyin O, Wesson J, Vogts D (2022a) The PBC model: supporting positive behaviours in smart environments. Sensors 22(24):9626. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adewoyin O, Wesson J, Vogts D (2022b) User modelling for behavioural modelling in smart environments. In: 2022 3rd International Conference on next generation computing applications (NextComp), Flic-en-Flac, Mauritius: IEEE, 2022, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/NextComp55567.2022.9932209

  • Agha S, Tollefson D, Paul S, Green D, Babigumira JB (2019) Use of the fogg behavior model to assess the impact of a social marketing campaign on condom use in Pakistan. J Health Commun 24(3):284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akner-Koler C, Ranjbar P (2016) Integrating sensitizing labs in an educational design process for haptic interaction. FormAkademisk 9(2):1–25

  • Alan RH, Hevner S, Marcalvatore T, Park J, Ram S, Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q, 28(1):75–105

  • Alberts L, Lyngs U, Van Kleek M (2023) Computers as bad social actors: dark patterns and anti-patterns in interfaces that act socially. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04720

  • Alexander KE, Brijnath B, Mazza D (2014) Barriers and enablers to delivery of the Healthy Kids Check: an analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model. Implement Sci 9(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexiou S, Fazakis N, Kocsis O, Fakotakis N, Moustakas K (2020) Sedentary workers recognition based on machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive technologies related to assistive environments, Corfu, Greece, 2020, pp 1–2

  • Anagnostopoulou A, Magoutas B, Bothos E, Mentzas G (2019) Persuasive technologies for sustainable smart cities: the case of urban mobility. In: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference, 2019, pp 73–82

  • Antheunis ML, Schouten AP (2011) The effects of other-generated and system-generated cues on adolescents’ perceived attractiveness on social network sites. J Comput-Mediat Commun 16(3):391–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antosik-Wójcińska AZ, Dominiak M, Chojnacka M, Kaczmarek-Majer K, Opara KR, Radziszewska W, Olwert A, Święcicki Ł (2020) Smartphone as a monitoring tool for bipolar disorder: a systematic review including data analysis, machine learning algorithms and predictive modelling. Int J Med Inform 138:104131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anvari F, Richards D, Hitchens M, Tran MT (2019) Teaching user centered conceptual design using cross-cultural personas and peer reviews for a large cohort of students. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on software engineering: software engineering education and training (ICSE-SEET), IEEE, 2019, pp 62–73.

  • Apiola M, Sutinen E (2021) Design science research for learning software engineering and computational thinking: Four cases. Comput Appl Eng Educ 29(1):83–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryal A, Becerik-Gerber B, Anselmo F, Roll SC, Lucas G (2019) Smart desks to promote comfort, health and productivity in offices: a vision for future workplaces. Front Built Environ 5:76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asbjørnsen RA, Wentzel J, Smedsrød ML, Hjelmesæth J, Clark MM, Nes LS, Van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC (2020) Identifying persuasive design principles and behavior change techniques supporting end user values and needs in ehealth interventions for long-term weight loss maintenance: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 22(11):e22598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (2011) The Social and Policy Impact of Social Cognitive Theory. In: Melvin M. Mark, Stewart I. Donaldson, and Bernadette Campbell. Social Psychology and Evaluation. The Guilford Press, pp 31–71 https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n18

  • Barnow BS, Trutko J (2015) The value of efficiency measures: lessons from workforce development programs. Public Perform Manag Rev 38(3):487–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett SJ (2011) Normality does not equal mental health: the need to look elsewhere for standards of good psychological health: the need to look elsewhere for standards of good psychological health. aBC-CLIO, Santa Barbara

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville R, Baiyere A, Gregor S, Hevner A, Rossi M (2018) Design science research contributions. J Assoc Inf Syst 19(5):358–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner JV, Zondervan R (2015) Motivating and achievement-eliciting pop-ups in online environments: a user experience perspective. Comput Human Behav 50:449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borst JP, Taatgen NA, van Rijn H (2015) What makes interruptions disruptive?: a process-model account of the effects of the problem state bottleneck on task interruption and resumption. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM Conference on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea: ACM, 2015, pp 2971–2980

  • Bose J, Hedden SL, Lipari RN, Park-Lee E (2018) Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/cbhsq-reports/NSDUHFFR2017/NSDUHFFR2017.pdf

  • Busch M, Schrammel J, Tscheligi M (2013) Personalized persuasive technology–development and validation of scales for measuring persuadability. In: International Conference on persuasive technology, Springer, 2013, pp 33–38.

  • Calvo RA, Peters D (2014) Self-awareness and self-compassion: Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential. MIT Press. p. 8 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9764.003.0011

  • Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S (2012) Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 7(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carillo KD (2010) Social cognitive theory in is research–literature review, criticism, and research agenda. In: International Conference on information systems, technology and management, Springer, 2010, pp 20–31

  • Casado-Mansilla D, Tsolakis AC, Borges CE, Kamara-Esteban O, Krinidis S, Avila JM, Tzovaras D, López-de-Ipiña D (2020) Socio-Economic effect on ICT-Based persuasive interventions towards energy efficiency in tertiary buildings. Energies 13(7):1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes L (2021) A guide to administering distance learning. Brill

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cyr D, Head M, Lim E, Stibe A (2018) Using the elaboration likelihood model to examine online persuasion through website design. Inform Manag 55(7):807–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerwinski M, Czerwinski M, Horvitz E, Wilhite S (2004) A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria: ACM, 2004, pp 175–182

  • Dolhalit ML, Salam SNA (2014) Exploring persuasive multimedia techniques in attitude and behavior change: a comparative study. Proc Soc Behav Sci 155:386–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer O (2020) Influencing children: limitations of the computer-human-interactive persuasive systems in developing societies. Int J Mod Educ Comput Sci 12(5):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehn M, Eriksson LC, Åkerberg N, Johansson A-C (2018) Activity monitors as support for older persons’ physical activity in daily life: qualitative study of the users’ experiences. JMIR mHealth uHealth 6(2):e34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbayoudi A, Lotfi A, Langensiepen C (2019) The human behaviour indicator: a measure of behavioural evolution. Expert Syst Appl 118:493–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzad A, Aaron Gulliver T (2020) Unsupervised log message anomaly detection. ICT Express 6(3):229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira B, Silva W, Barbosa SDJ, Conte T (2018) Technique for representing requirements using personas: a controlled experiment. IET Softw 12(3):280–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiore SM, Wiltshire TJ, Lobato EJC, Jentsch FG, Huang WH, Axelrod B (2013) Toward understanding social cues and signals in human–robot interaction: effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior. Front Psychol 4:859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamand L (2012) Critique of social cognitive theory. e-How.com. Retrieved from, 2012

  • Fogg BJ (1998) Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1998, pp 225–232

  • Fogg BJ (1999) Persuasive technologies. Commun ACM 42(5):27–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogg B (2002) Persuasive technology. Using computers to change what we think and Do. 2002. [Online]. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=763957 Accessed 15 May 2021

  • Brian J. Fogg BJ (2009) A behavior model for persuasive design. In: Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on persuasive technology, ACM, 2009, p 40

  • Gambino A, Fox J, Ratan RA (2020) Building a stronger CASA: extending the computers are social actors paradigm. Human-Mach Commun 1(1):5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner (2020) Gartner survey reveals 47% of organizations will increase investments in IoT despite the impact of COVID-19

  • Gaube S, Tsivrikos D, Dollinger D, Lermer E (2018) How a smiley protects health: a pilot intervention to improve hand hygiene in hospitals by activating injunctive norms through emoticons. PLoS ONE 13(5):e0197465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghapanchi AH, Purarjomandlangrudi A, McAndrew A, Miao Y (2020) Investigating the impact of space design, visual attractiveness and perceived instructor presence on student adoption of learning management systems. Educ Inform Technol 25(6):5053–5066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson ND, Ng N, Pavey TG, Ryde GC, Straker L, Brown WJ (2016) Project energise: using participatory approaches and real time computer prompts to reduce occupational sitting and increase work time physical activity in office workers. J Sci Med Sport 19(11):926–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q 37(2):337–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimaraes M, Emmendorfer L, Adamatti D (2018) Persuasive agent based simulation for evaluation of the dynamic threshold line and trigger classification from the Fogg Behavior Model. Simul Model Pract Theory 83:18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy D, Ekinci Y, Can AS, Murray JC (2022) Effectiveness of message framing in changing COVID-19 vaccination intentions: moderating role of travel desire. Tour Manag 90:104468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkiopoulos C, Antonopoulou H, Gkintoni E, Koumparelis A (2021) Psychology of colors in marketing. A data analysis of greek historical advertisements. In: Int J Innov Sci Res Technol 6(4):1–19

  • Head KJ, Harrington NG, Schnur JB, Margolies L, Montgomery GH (2022) Examining gain- and loss-framed messages in a novel breast cancer screening/cardiovascular context: Does framing matter? PEC Innov 1:100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2021.100007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner AR (2007) A three cycle view of design science research. Scand J Inf Syst 19(2):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28:75–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner A, Chatterjee S (2010) Design science research in information systems. In: Design science research in information systems. Springer, Boston, pp 9–22

  • Hollis V, Konrad A, Whittaker S (2015) Change of heart: emotion tracking to promote behavior change. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on human factors in computing systems, 2015, pp 2643–2652

  • Horppu R, Martimo KP, MacEachen E, Lallukka T, Viikari-Juntura E (2018) Application of the theoretical domains framework and the behaviour change wheel to understand physicians’ behaviors and behavior change in using temporary work modifications for return to work: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil 28(1):135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalal A, Quaid MAK, Hasan AS (2018) Wearable sensor-based human behavior understanding and recognition in daily life for smart environments. In: 2018 International Conference on frontiers of information technology (FIT), Islamabad, Pakistan: IEEE, 2018, pp 105–110

  • Jaspers M, De Winter AF, Huisman M, Verhulst FC, Ormel J, Stewart RE, Reijneveld SA (2012) Trajectories of psychosocial problems in adolescents predicted by findings from early well-child assessments. J Adolesc Health 51(5):475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson P, Perjons E (2014) An introduction to design science. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y-H, Jeon JH, Choe EK, Lee B, Kim KH, Seo J (2016) TimeAware: leveraging framing effects to enhance personal productivity. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 2016, pp 272–283

  • Kim Y-H, Choe EK, Lee B, Seo J (2019) Understanding personal productivity: how knowledge workers define, evaluate, and reflect on their productivity. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, Glasgow, UK: ACM, 2019, p 615

  • Kobberholm KW, Carstens KS, Bøg LW, Santos MHA, Ramskov S, Mohamed SA, Jensen LC (2020) The influence of incremental information presentation on the persuasiveness of a robot. In: Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2020, pp 302–304

  • Kuechler W, Vaishnavi V (2012) A framework for theory development in design science research: multiple perspectives. J Assoc Inf Syst 13(6):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuonanoja L, Oinas-Kukkonen H (2018) Recognizing and mitigating the negative effects of information technology use: a systematic review of persuasive characteristics in information systems. In: Scandinavian Conference on information systems, Springer, 2018, pp 14–25

  • Laine M, Zhang Y, Santala S, Jokinen JPP, Oulasvirta A (2021) Responsive and personalized web layouts with integer programming. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, no. EICS, pp 1–23

  • Laurillau Y, Calvary G, Nguyen VB (2018) UP! engineering persuasive interactive. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, 2018, pp 1–6

  • Lazzari F, Mor G, Cipriano J, Gabaldon E, Grillone B, Chemisana D, Solsona F (2022) User behaviour models to forecast electricity consumption of residential customers based on smart metering data. Energy Rep 8:3680–3691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Walker E, Burleson W, Kay M, Buman M, Hekler EB (2017) Self-experimentation for behavior change: design and formative evaluation of two approaches. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2017, pp 6837–6849

  • Liljestrand I, Gonzales M, Shin D (2019) Developing a mental model for use in the context of computer security. In: Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on applied computing, ACM, 2019, pp 2336–2339

  • Lombard M, Kun Xu (2021) Social responses to media technologies in the 21st century: The media are social actors paradigm. Human-Mach Commun 2(1):2

    Google Scholar 

  • Manika D, Gregory-Smith D, Papagiannidis S (2018) The influence of prior knowledge structures on website attitudes and behavioral intentions. Comput Hum Behav 78:44–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marakas GM, Yi MY, Johnson RD (1998) The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Inf Syst Res 9(2):126–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark G, Czerwinski M, Iqbal ST (2018) Effects of individual differences in blocking workplace distractions. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, QC, Canada: ACM, 2018, p 92

  • Mathew AP (2005) Using the environment as an interactive interface to motivate positive behavior change in a subway station. In: CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2005, pp 1637–1640

  • McDonagh LK, Saunders JM, Cassell J, Curtis T, Bastaki H, Hartney T, Rait G (2018) Application of the COM-B model to barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice for young people and primary care practitioners: a systematic review. Implement Sci 13(1):130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meader N, King K, Moe-Byrne T, Wright K, Graham H, Petticrew M, Power C, White M, Sowden AJ (2016) A systematic review on the clustering and co-occurrence of multiple risk behaviours. BMC Public Health 16(1):657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R (2011a) The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 6(1):42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, Dombrowski SU, Bishop A, French DP (2011b) A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health 26(11):1479–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michie S, Atkins L, West R (2014) “The behaviour change wheel”, A guide to designing interventions, 1st edn. Silverback Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Midden C, Ham J (2018) Linda Steg, Agnes E. van den Berg, and Judith I.M. de Groot Persuasive technology to promote pro‐environmental behaviour. In: Environmental psychology: an introduction, pp 283–294

  • Middleton L, Hall H, Raeside R (2018) Applications and applicability of Social Cognitive Theory in information science research. J Libr Inform Sci, 51(4):0961000618769985

  • Mishra K, Firdaus M, Ekbal A (2022) Please be polite: Towards building a politeness adaptive dialogue system for goal-oriented conversations. Neurocomputing 494:242–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mook DG (1987) Motivation: the organization of action. WW Norton

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora N, Matrella G, Ciampolini P (2018) Cloud-based behavioral monitoring in smart homes. Sensors 18(6):1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mubin O, Cai B, Al Mahmud A, Mubin O, Kharub I, Lwin M, Khan A (2022) A preliminary evaluation of mobile phone apps to curb alcohol consumption. In J Environ Res Public Health 19(1):135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan S , Georgiou PG (2013) Behavioral Signal Processing: Deriving Human Behavioral Informatics From Speech and Language: Computational techniques are presented to analyze and model expressed and perceived human behavior–variedly characterized as typical, atypical, distressed, and d. In: Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1203–1233, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2236291

  • Nass C, Moon Y, Fogg BJ, Reeves B, Christopher Dryer D (1995) Can computer personalities be human personalities? Int J Human-Comput Stud 43(2):223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nejad SG, Hansen H (2021) Environmentally motivated travel reduction: the effects of availability, herding bias, and self-monitoring. Sustainability 13(2):691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen PT, Yandi A, Rizky Mahaputra M (2020) Factors that influence employee performance: motivation, leadership, environment, culture organization, work achievement, competence and compensation (A study of human resource management literature studies). Dinasti Int J Digit Bus Manag 1(4):645–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H, Ruiz C, Wilson V, Strong D, Djamasbi S (2018) Using personality traits and chronotype to support personalization and feedback in a sleep health behavior change support system. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on system sciences, 2018

  • Nicholas CA, Cohen AL (2016) The effect of interruption on the decision-making process. Judgment Decis Making 11(6):611–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M (2018) Michael Howlett and Ishani Mukherjee Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model and system features 1. In: Routledge handbook of policy design, vol. 24, no. 28. Routledge, pp 87–105

  • Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M (2009) Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 24(28):485–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojo SO, Bailey DP, Brierley ML, Hewson DJ, Chater AM (2019) Breaking barriers: using the behavior change wheel to develop a tailored intervention to overcome workplace inhibitors to breaking up sitting time. BMC Public Health 19(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orji R, Lomotey R, Oyibo K, Orji F, Blustein J, Shahid S (2018) Tracking feels oppressive and ‘punishy’: exploring the costs and benefits of self-monitoring for health and wellness. Digit Health 4:2055207618797554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey V, Upadhyay DD, Nag N, Jain RC (2020) Personalized user modelling for context-aware lifestyle recommendations to improve sleep. In: HealthRecSys@ RecSys, 2020, pp 8–14.

  • Panetta K (2021) Gartner top strategic technology trends for 2021. Information Technology, Stamford, CT, Oct. 19, 2021. [Online]. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/gartner-top-strategic-technology-trends-for-2021 Accessed 26 March 2023

  • Pataki-Bittó F, Németh E (2017) Interruption overload in an office environment: hungarian survey focusing on the factors that affect job satisfaction and work efficiency. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Soc Behav Educ Econ Bus Ind Eng 11(7):1776–1783

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen T (2015) Risky behaviour could be behind high rate of natural deaths. new24, Capetown, South Africa, p. 1, Jul. 01, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Risky-behaviour-could-be-behind-high-rate-of-natural-deaths-20150701 Accessed 14 May 2022

  • Ploch N (2016) The effects of self-monitoring with accuracy training on correct sitting posture and productivity. Master’s Thesis. California State University, Sacramento. The Effects of Self-Monitoring with Accuracy Training on Correct Sitting Posture and Productivity

  • Pouri MJ, Hilty LM (2020) A typology of digital sharing business models: a design science research approach. In: International Conference on design science research in information systems and technology, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020, pp. 297–308

  • Prat N, Comyn-Wattiau I, Akoka J (2015) A taxonomy of evaluation methods for information systems artifacts. J Manag Inf Syst 32(3):229–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves B, Nass C (1998) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places, vol. 34, no. 3. Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.1997.576013.

  • Rello L, Pielot M, Marcos M-C (2016) Make it big! The effect of font size and line spacing on online readability. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, 2016, pp 3637–3648

  • Remy C, Bates O, Dix A, Thomas V, Hazas M, Frida Ay, Huang EM (2018) Evaluation beyond usability: validating sustainable HCI research. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, 2018, pp 1–14

  • Ren Q, Gao C, Shao J, Yan J, Tan X, Lam W, Ma L (2024) Exploring safety generalization challenges of large language models via code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07865

  • RescueTime (2020) Rescuetime. [Online]. Available: http://rescuetime.com. Accessed 7 Aug 2020

  • Rieder A, Vuckic S, Schache K, Jung R (2020) Technostress from persuasion: wearable users’ stressors, strains, and coping. In: Forty-First International Conference on information systems, India, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/261089/1/Riederet al_2020_Technostress from Persuasion.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2022

  • Rist T, Masoodian M (2019) Promoting sustainable energy consumption behavior through interactive data visualizations. Multimodal Technol Interact 3(3):56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooksby J, Asadzadeh P, Rost M, Morrison A, Chalmers M (2016) Personal tracking of screen time on digital devices. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 2016, pp 284–296

  • Saleem S, Feng Y, Luqman A (2021) Excessive SNS use at work, technological conflicts and employee performance: a social-cognitive-behavioral perspective. Technol Soc 65:101584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salminen J, Guan KW, Jung S-G, Jansen B (2022) Use cases for design personas: a systematic review and new frontiers. In: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, 2022, pp 1–21

  • Samad AM, Mishra K, Firdaus M, Ekbal A (2022) Empathetic persuasion: reinforcing empathy and persuasiveness in dialogue systems. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022, 2022, pp 844–856

  • Shiotani M, Yamaguchi K (2022) Research on an anomaly detection method for physical condition change of elderly people in care facilities. Adv Biomed Eng 11:10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyam Sundar S, Jia H, Franklin Waddell T, Huang Y (2015) Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME): Four models for explaining how interface features affect user psychology. The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology 3:47–86https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch3

  • Silva M, Graham F, Levack W, Hay-Smith EJC (2019) Persuasive technology and behaviour change in parent-focused eHealth interventions supporting child health: A scoping review protocol. NZ J Physiother 47(1):36–48

  • Sivasubramaniyam RD, Charlton SG, Sargisson RJ (2021) Super-tailoring: using self-persuasion to reduce drivers’ car use. Transport Res Interdiscipl Perspect 10:100359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenberg C, Brocke JV (2012) Evaluations in the science of the artificial–reconsidering the build-evaluate pattern in design science research. In: International Conference on design science research in information systems, Springer, 2012, pp 381–397

  • Stamell G, Lyneis D (2001) Everyday behavior over time graph. The creative learning exchange, 1 Keefe Road Acton, MA 01720 (978) 287–0070, 2001. [Online]. Available: http://static.clexchange.org/ftp/documents/x-curricular/CC2001-11EverydayBOTGs.pdf Accessed 25 Aug 2022

  • Stibe A, Oinas-Kukkonen H, Bērziņa I, Pahnila S (2011) Incremental persuasion through microblogging: a survey of Twitter users in Latvia. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on persuasive technology: persuasive technology and design: enhancing sustainability and health, 2011, pp 1–8

  • Sun Y, Kantor PB (2006) Cross-evaluation: a new model for information system evaluation. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 57(5):614–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao X, Peng Y, Zhao F, Zhao P, Wang Y (2018) A parallel algorithm for network traffic anomaly detection based on Isolation Forest. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 14(11):1550147718814471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike E (2021) Burrhus skinner and the behaviourists. SAGE, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Venable J, Pries-Heje J, Baskerville R (2016) FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur J Inf Syst 25(1):77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venable J, Pries-Heje J, Baskerville R (2012) A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In: International Conference on design science research in information systems, Springer, 2012, pp 423–438

  • Vom Brocke J, Winter R, Hevner A, Maedche A (2020) Special issue editorial–accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: a journey through time and space. J Assoc Inform Syst 21(3):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber D, Mayer S, Voit A, Fierro RV, Henze N (2016) Design guidelines for notifications on smart TVs. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on interactive experiences for TV and online video, 2016, pp 13–24

  • White G, Liang Z, Clarke S (2019) A quantified-self framework for exploring and enhancing personal productivity. In: 2019 International Conference on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI), IEEE, 2019, pp 1–6

  • Whittaker S, Kalnikaite V, Hollis V, Guydish A (2016) ‘Don’t Waste My Time’ use of time information improves focus. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, 2016, pp 1729–1738

  • Wilson P, Alan Mantooth H (2013) Model-based engineering for complex electronic systems. Newnes

  • Yasumatsu T, Watanabe T, Kanei F, Shioji E, Akiyama M, Mori T (2019) Understanding the responsiveness of mobile app developers to software library updates. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on data and application security and privacy, 2019, pp 13–24

Download references

Acknowledgements

All thanks to my co-authors and the funding body for their immense support for this project.

Funding

This study was funded by Telkom/Centre of Excellence, of the Nelson Mandela University, South Africa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computing Sciences, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, 6001, South Africa

    Oluwande Adewoyin, Janet Wesson & Dieter Vogts

Authors
  1. Oluwande Adewoyin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Janet Wesson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dieter Vogts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, Oluwande Adewoyin; methodology, Oluwande Adewoyin.; software, Olu-wande Adewoyin.; validation, Janet Wesson.; formal analysis, Oluwande Adewoyin.; investiga-tion, Oluwande Adewoyin.; resources, Janet Wesson; data curation, Oluwande Adewoyin; writ-ing—Oluwande Adewoyin; writing—review and editing, Janet Wesson and Dieter Vogts.; visu-alization, Janet Wesson supervision and Dieter Vogts, Janet Wesson; project administration, Janet Wesson; funding acquisition, Janet Wesson.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oluwande Adewoyin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no competing interest regarding the publication of this paper.”

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adewoyin, O., Wesson, J. & Vogts, D. The PBC model: promoting positive behaviours through change-based interventions. Cogn Tech Work 26, 673–708 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-024-00776-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-024-00776-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation