Abstract
Traffic light assistance systems (TLASs) can be infrastructure based or on-board, and in the latter case they can inform the driver about the time remaining to green, or about the recommended speed for a smooth passage at green. A speed-based and a time-based on-board system prototype was compared against each other and against a baseline without any assistance system. Using a within-subjects design, 18 participants drove in a fixed-base simulator along a suburban road with signalised intersections, where the delay to green was set to zero (allowing a passage at the current speed), “half-speed” (requiring a clear speed reduction) and “stop” (requiring a substantial speed reduction). Driving behaviour, visual attention distribution and acceptance were evaluated. Both support systems improved driving efficiency and comfort over baseline, with the time-based system achieving higher scores in general. Both systems attracted a substantial amount of visual attention in the current setting; however, single-glance durations were below 1 s, and the number of glances forward were equal in the time-based condition compared to baseline, but lower in the speed-based condition. No red or amber light violations were registered in baseline, while some occurred with any of the systems. Acceptance for both systems was high, with higher scores for the time-based prototype. Overall, an on-board TLAS with a countdown timer to green has the potential to increase efficiency and comfort without strong indications for attention disruption, but the risk for increased red/amber light violations has to be addressed. Improved system design as a way to mitigate potential issues is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ahlstrom C, Kircher K (2017) Changes in glance behaviour when using a visual eco-driving system—a field study. Appl Ergon 58:414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.001
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (2006) Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems: including 2006 updated sections
Amditis A, Polychronopoulos A, Andreone L, Bekiaris E (2006) Communication and interaction strategies in automotive adaptive interfaces. Cogn Technol Work 8(3):193–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0033-0
Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2009) Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 4(3):114–123
Ceylan H, Bell MGH (2004) Traffic signal timing optimisation based on genetic algorithm approach, including drivers’ routing. Transp Res Part B 38(4):329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00015-8
Chiou YC, Chang CH (2010) Driver responses to green and red vehicular signal countdown displays: safety and efficiency aspects. Accid Anal Prev 42(4):1057–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.013
Duivenvoorden K (2007) Roadside versus in-car speed support for a green wave: a driving simulator study. University of … Retrieved from http://www.utwente.nl/ctw/aida/education/Rapport_KD.pdf
Frank A, Schneider F, Meschtscherjakov A, Stadon J (2015) Advanced traffic light interface : countdown timers to increase user experience. AutoUI ’15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809730.2809737
Fu C, Zhang Y, Qi W, Cheng S (2016) Effects of digital countdown timer on intersection safety and efficiency: a systematic review. Traffic Inj Prev 17(1):98–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2015.1043128
Huang M, Fujita M, Wisetjindawat W (2017) Countdown timers, video surveillance and drivers ’ stop/go behavior : winter versus summer. Accid Anal Prev 98:185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.020
Islam MR, Hurwitz DS, Macuga KL (2016) Improved driver responses at intersections with red signal countdown timers. Transp Res Part C 63:207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.12.008
ISO (2002) International Standard ISO 15007-1—road vehicles—measurement of driver visual behaviour with respect to transport information and control systems—part 1: definitions and parameters. Order. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0297-3
Katsaros K (2011). Performance study of a Green Light Optimal Speed Advisory (GLOSA) application using an integrated cooperative ITS simulation platform. In: Proceedings of wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC), pp 918–923. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2011.5982524
Kircher K, Ahlstrom C (2016) Minimum required attention: a human-centered approach to driver inattention. Hum Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816672756
Kircher K, Fors C, Ahlstrom C (2014) Continuous versus intermittent presentation of visual eco-driving advice. Transp Res Part F 24:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.02.007
Krause M, Bengler K (2012). Traffic light assistant—driven in a simulator, pp 1–6
Krause M, Knott V, Bengler K (2013) Traffic light assistant—can take my eyes off of you. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society europe chapter annual conference, vol 4959
Krause M, Rissel A, Bengler K (2014) Traffic light assistant—what the users want, (c), pp 235–241. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84966588599&partnerID=40&md5=1cdfcdb6a164d071a29eef2349594438
Kulkarni S, Dass V, Sharma A (2014) Intelligent traffic light control with wireless sensor networks. Int J Innov Res Comput Sci Technol 2(2):36–39
Long K, Liu Y, Han LD (2013) Impact of countdown timer on driving maneuvers after the yellow onset at signalized intersections: an empirical study in Changsha, China. Saf Sci 54:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.10.007
Mei CQ, Huang HJ, Tang TQ (2008) Improving urban traffic by velocity guidance. In: Proceedings—international conference on intelligent computation technology and automation, ICICTA 2008, vol 2, pp 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICTA.2008.288
Preuk K, Stemmler E, Jipp M (2016) Does surrounding traffic benefit from an assisted driver with traffic light assistance system ? Transp Res Part F 43:302–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.008
Raksuntorn W (2012) The effects of countdown signals on intersection capacity. Int Trans J Eng Manag Appl Sci Technol 3(2):2–3
Rittger L, Schmidt G, Maag C, Kiesel A (2015) Driving behaviour at traffic light intersections. Cong Technol Work 49:1–25
Sánchez M, Cano JC, Kim D (2007) Predicting traffic lights to improve urban traffic fuel consumption. In: ITST 2006—2006 6th international conference on ITS telecommunications, proceedings, pp 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITST.2006.288906
Tango F, Montanari R (2006) Shaping the drivers’ interaction: how the new vehicle systems match the technological requirements and the human needs. Cogn Technol Work 8(3):215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0038-8
Thoma S, Lindberg T, Klinker G (2007) Speed recommendations during traffic light approach : a comparison of different display concepts. Group, pp 1–13. Retrieved from http://campar.in.tum.de/pub/thoma2007Hfes/thoma2007Hfes.pdf
Tielert T, Killat M, Hartenstein H, Luz R, Hausberger S, Benz T (2010) The impact of traffic-light-to-vehicle communication on fuel consumption and emissions. In: Internet of Things (IOT), 2010, pp 1–8
Trayford RS, Crowle TB (1989) The ADVISE traffic information display system. In: Vehicle navigation and information systems conference, Conference Record, IEEE, pp 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/VNIS.1989.98748
Tullis T, Albert B (2013) Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-00016-9
Wiering M, Koopman A (2004) Intelligent traffic light control. Transp Res 53(2004–29), 40–41. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1.5180&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Z., Kircher, K. Comparison of a time- and a speed-based traffic light assistance system. Cogn Tech Work 20, 93–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0458-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0458-7