Modeling human behavior in manual control Rendezvous and Docking task

• Anderson JR, Bothell D, Lebiere C et al (1998) An integrated theory of list memory. J Mem Lang 38(4):341–380

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anderson JR, Bothell D, Byrne MD et al (2004) An integrated theory of the mind. Psychol Rev 111(4):1036

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ashtiani M, Azgomi MA (2015) A multi-criteria decision-making formulation of trust using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Cogn Technol Work 17(4):465–488

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brody AR (1990) Evaluation of the “0.1%” rule for docking maneuvers. J Spacecr Rockets 27(1):7–8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brody AR, Ellis SR (1990) Factors influencing manual ability to recover from an anomalous thruster input during a simulated docking maneuver (Paper No. 90-0519). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington

• Byrne MD, Kirlik A (2005) Using computational cognitive modeling to diagnose possible sources of aviation error. Int J Aviat Psychol 15(2):135–155

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Byrne MD, Pew RW (2009) A history and primer of human performance modeling. Rev Hum Factors Ergon 5(1):225–263

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Byrne M D, Kirlik A (2003) Integrated Modeling of Cognition and the Information Environment: A Closed-Loop, ACT-R Approach to Modeling Approach and Landing With and Without Synthetic Vision System (SVS) Technology. In: Proceedings of NASA Aviation Safety Program Conference on Human Performance Modeling of Approach and Landing with Augmented Displays. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, pp 91–117

• Byrne MD, Kirlik A, Fleetwood MD et al (2004) A closed-loop, ACT-R approach to modeling approach and landing with and without synthetic vision system (SVS) technology. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting, vol 48, no 17. SAGE Publications, pp 2111–2115

• Cao S, Liu Y (2013) Queueing network–adaptive control of thought rational (QN–ACTR): an integrated cognitive architecture for modelling complex cognitive and multi-task performance. Int J Hum Factors Model Simul 4(1):63–86

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chang IS, Tomei EJ (2009) Non-US human space transportation failures. Trans Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci Space Technol Jpn 7(ists26):tg_11–tg_20

  Google Scholar 

• Chen W, Li SQ, Fu Y et al (2014) Application of a human behavior model in space human performance research. In: Human Performance in space: advancing astronautics research in China. AAAS Press, Washington, pp 54–56

  Google Scholar 

• Chua ZK, Feigh KM (2013) Pilot decision making during landing point designation. Cogn Technol Work 15(3):297–311

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cohen I, Brinkman WP, Neerincx MA (2015) Modelling environmental and cognitive factors to predict performance in a stressful training scenario on a naval ship simulator. Cogn Technol Work 17(4):503–519

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Donges E (1978) A two-level model of driver steering behavior. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 20(6):691–707

  Google Scholar 

• Fehse W (2003) Automated rendezvous and docking of spacecraft. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Foyle DC, Hooey BL (2007) Human performance modeling in aviation. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Fuller HJA (2010) The virtual driver: integrating physical and cognitive human models to simulate driving with a secondary in-vehicle task. The University of Michigan

• Gluck KA, Ball JT, Krusmark MA et al (2003) A computational process model of basic aircraft maneuvering. Air Force Research Lab, Mesa

  Google Scholar 

• Hancock PA, Jagacinski RJ, Parasuraman R et al (2013) Human-automation interaction research past, present, and future. Ergon Des Q Hum Factors Appl 21(2):9–14

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Itoh K, Yamaguchi T, Hansen JP et al (2001) Risk analysis of ship navigation by use of cognitive simulation. Cogn Technol Work 3(1):4–21

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones RM (2004) An introduction to cognitive architectures for modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the interservice/industry training, simulation and education conference. I/ITSEC, Orlando, FL

• Just MA, Carpenter PA (1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychol Rev 99(1):122

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kieras DE, Meyer DE (1997) An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Hum Comput Interact 12(4):391–438

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kieras DE, Wood SD, Meyer DE (1997) Predictive engineering models based on the EPIC architecture for a multimodal high-performance human-computer interaction task. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact (TOCHI) 4(3):230–275

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kleinman DL, Baron S, Levison WH (1970) An optimal control model of human response part I: theory and validation. Automatica 6(3):357–369

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kontogiannis T (2005) Integration of task networks and cognitive user models using coloured Petri nets and its application to job design for safety and productivity. Cogn Technol Work 7(4):241–261

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Laird JE, Newell A, Rosenbloom PS (1987) Soar: an architecture for general intelligence. Artif Intell 33(1):1–64

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Land M, Horwood J (1995) Which parts of the road guide steering? Nature 377(6547):339–340

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee CC (1990) Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller. II. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 20(2):419–435

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Li SQ, Chen W, Fu Y et al (2016) Investigating the effects of experience on human performance in an object-tracking task: a case study of manual rendezvous and docking. Behav Inf Technol 35(6): 427–441

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liu Y (2009) QN-ACES: integrating queueing network and ACT-R, CAPS, EPIC, and Soar architectures for multitask cognitive modeling. Int J Hum Comput Interact 25(6):554–581

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lovett MC, Anderson JR (2005) Thinking as a production system. In: The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 401–429

• Macadam CC (2003) Understanding and modeling the human driver. Veh Syst Dyn 40(1–3):101–134

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Machula MF, Sandhoo GS (2005) Rendezvous and docking for space exploration. In: 1st Space exploration conference: continuing the voyage of discovery, vol 30

• McRuer DT, Jex HR (1967) A review of quasi-linear pilot models. IEEE Trans Hum Factors Electron 3:231–249

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McRuer DT, Krendel ES (1974) Mathematical models of human pilot behavior. Advisory group for aerospace research and development neuilly-sur-seine (France)

• Newell A (1994) Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Ritter FE, Kukreja U, Amant RS (2007) Including a model of visual processing with a cognitive architecture to model a simple teleoperation task. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 1(2):121–147

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salvucci DD (2001) Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: an integrated model approach. Int J Hum Comput Stud 55(1):85–107

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Salvucci DD (2006) Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 48(2):362–380

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salvucci DD, Gray R (2004) A two-point visual control model of steering. Perception (Lond) 33(10):1233–1248

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sedej DT, Clarke SF (1985) Rendezvous/proximity operations workbook (RNDZ 2102). NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Mission Operations Directorate Training Division Flight Training Branch, Houston, TX

• Zemla JC, Ustun V, Byrne MD et al (2011) An ACT-R model of commercial jetliner taxiing. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 55, no 1. Sage Publications, pp 831–835

• Zhang S, Tian Y, Wang C et al (2014) Modeling human control strategies in simulated RVD tasks through the time-fuel optimal control model. In: Digital human modeling. Applications in health, safety, ergonomics and risk management. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 661–670

• Zheng P, McDonald M (2005) Application of fuzzy systems in the car-following behaviour analysis. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery. FSKD, Changsha, China, pp 782–791

• Zhou JY, Jiang ZC, Tang GJ (2012) A new approach for teleoperation rendezvous and docking with time delay. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 55(2):339–346

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zimpfer D, Kachmar P, Tuohy S (2005) Autonomous rendezvous, capture and in-space assembly: past, present and future. In: 1st Space exploration conference: continuing the voyage of discovery, vol 1. Orlando, Florida, USA, pp 234–245

Download references