Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Design of joint systems: a theoretical challenge for cognitive systems engineering

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper the “joint systems approach” will be discussed. The approach is considered as a new paradigm in cognitive systems engineering (CSE). Its central idea, that human and technology form a functional unity, is as such not new. Why, then, has this idea become so appealing right now? In the first part of the paper we seek answers to this question by analysing the current situation in product design. The conclusion is that the focus of design is shifting from single products to intelligent environments. This change in focus induces tensions into the design process that urge for solutions. One of them is re-conceptualising the relationship between human and technology, precisely what the joint system approach is about. Three different joint system approaches are considered: the joint cognitive systems approach (JCS), the Risö extended CSE approach, and the joint intelligent systems (JIS) approach proposed by us. Comparisons are made with regard to how these approaches understand the joint system to be organised. While the JCS approach focuses on the human–technology relationship, the other two consider this relationship as embedded in a context of object-oriented activity. As a consequence, environment becomes included in the joint system. In JIS approach we propose the use of the semiotic concept of habit to characterise the ways of functioning of the joint system. “Habit” is a tool for identifying generic patterns in the situation-specific behaviour of the system. Defining habits enables expressing the meaning or purpose of the system’s functioning. In the end of the paper, we propose a design process model for the development of JIS. This approach is aimed at designing systems in usage i.e. to design of practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Albrechtsen H, Andersen HHK, Bödker S, Pejtersen AM (2001) Affordances in activity theory and cognitive systems engineering (Risö-R-1287(EN)). Risö National Laboratory, Roskilde

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon L (2000) Situating workplace studies within the human-computer interaction field. In: Luff P, Hindmarsh J, Heath C (eds) Workplace studies. Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 230–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon L (2002) Taking “human-centred computing” seriously. Unpublished manuscript, Helsinki

  • Bödker S, Andersen PB (2005) Complex mediation. Hum Comput Interact 20:353–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1997) How we think. Dover Publications, Mineola

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish P (2001) Where the action is. The foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Elm WC, Potter SS, Gualtieri JW, Easter JR, Roth E (2003) Applied cognitive work analysis: a pragmatic methodology for designing revolutionary cognitive affordances. In: Hollnagel E (ed) Handbook of cognitive task design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 357–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairley RE, Thayer RE (1997) The concept of operations: The bridge from operational requirements to technical specifications. Ann Softw Eng 3:417–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzmann S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1979) The ecolocical approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock P, Chignell M (1995) On human factors. In: Flach J, Hancock P, Caird J, Vicente KJ (eds) Global perspectives on the ecology of human–machine systems, vol 1. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 14–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan J, Hutchins E, Kirsch D (2000) Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human–computer interaction research. AMC Transact Comput Hum Interact 7(2):174–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2003a) Prolegomenon to cognitive task design. In: Hollnagel E (ed) Handbook of cognitive task design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (ed) (2003b) Handbook of cognitive task design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

  • Hollnagel E, Woods D (1983) Cognitive systems engineering: new wine in new bottles. Int J Man Mach Stud 18:583–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods D (2005) Joint cognitive systems. Foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (2000) The perception of the environment. Essays on livelyhood, dwelling and skill. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto T (1998a) The theory of organism-environment system (I). Description of the theory. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 33(4):317–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto T (1998b) The theory of organism-environment system (II): significance of nervous activity in the organism-environment system. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 33(4):331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto T (1999) The theory of organism-environment system (III): role of efferent influences on receptors in the formation of knowledge. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 34(2):90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto T (2000) The theory of organism-environment system (IV): the problem of mental activity and consciousness. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 35(1):35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaasinen E, Norros L (eds) (2007) Design of smart environments. Towards ecological systems thinking (in Finnish). Teknologiainfo Teknova Oy, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Keinonen T (2007) Immediate, product and remote design. Paper presented at the International Association of Societies of Design and Research, Hong Kong

  • Kestenbaum V (1977) The phenomenological sense of John Dewey: habit and meaning. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. The Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuutti K (2007) Design research, disciplines, and new production of knowledge. Paper presented at the International Association of Societies of Design Research, Hong Kong

  • Kuutti K, Keinonen T, Norros L, Kaasinen E (2007) Intelligent environment as a design challenge. In: Kaasinen E, Norros L (eds) Design of intelligent environments—towards ecological systems approach (in Finnish). Teknologiainfo Teknova Oy, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1999) Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev AN (1978) Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B (eds) (2005). How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

  • Norman D (2006) Interaction design is still an art form. Ergonomics is real engineering. In: Interactions. p. 45

  • Norros L (2004) Acting under uncertainty. The core-task analysis in ecological study of work, vol 546). VTT, Espoo, URL: http//www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/

  • Norros L (2006) Improving design by understanding usage—outline of an ecological design concept for smart environments scientific forward look. (Nanoscience and the long-term future of information technology (NSIT)). European Science Foundation, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Savioja P (2004) Usability evaluation of complex systems (STUK-YTO-TR 204). Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Kuutti K, Rämä P, Alakärppä I (2007) Development of ecological design concept. In: Kaasinen E, Norros L (eds) Design of intelligent environments—towards ecological systems approach. Teknologiainfo Teknova Oy, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Papin B (2002) Integration of human factors requirements in the design of future plants. Paper presented at the Enlarged Halden Programme Group Meeting, Storefjell

  • Peirce CS (1958) Letters to lady Welby. In: Wiener P (ed) Selected writings of C.C. Peirce. Dover Publications, New York, pp 380–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1998a) The Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism. In T. P. E. project (ed) The essential peirce. Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 133–241

  • Peirce CS (1998b) The peirce edition project. Introduction. In T. P. E. Project (ed) The essential Peirce. Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. XVII–XXXVIII

  • Pickering JJ (1999) The self is a semiotic process. J Conscious Stud 6(4):31–47

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human–machine interaction. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1997) Merging paradigms: decision making, management, and cognitive control. In: Flin R, Salas E, Strub ME, Marting L (eds) Decision making under stress: emerging paradigms and applications. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 183–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Rückriem G (2003). Tool or medium? The meaning of information and telecommunication technology to human practice. A quest for systemic understanding of activity theory. University of Helsinki, Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research. Retrieved 19.4.04, 2004, from the World Wide Web

  • Savioja P, Norros L (2008) Systems usability—promoting core-task oriented work practices. In: Law E, Thora Hvannberg E, Cockton G, Vanderdonckt J (eds) Maturing usability: quality in software, interaction and value. Springer, London, pp 123–143

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman LA (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human–machine communication. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll JV (1934) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In: Schiller C (ed) Instinctive behavior. International Universities Press, New York, p 1957

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis. Toward a safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods D, Hollnagel E (1987) Mapping cognitive demands in complex problem-solving worlds. Int J Man Mach studies 26:257–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods D, Hollnagel E (2006) Joint cognitive systems—patterns in cognitive systems engineering. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in Society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambok C (1997) Naturalistic decision making: where are we now? In: Zambok C, Klein GA (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P. O. Box 1000, 02044 VTT, Espoo, Finland

    Leena Norros & Leena Salo

Authors
  1. Leena Norros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leena Salo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leena Norros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norros, L., Salo, L. Design of joint systems: a theoretical challenge for cognitive systems engineering. Cogn Tech Work 11, 43–56 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0122-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0122-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation