Abstract
This paper explores the use of Activity Theory for the evaluation of user behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Specifically, the study of user behaviour focuses on interactivity, which is argued to be one of the most important processes that take place between a user and the system in virtual reality. The ultimate intention is to study the role and the effect of interactivity on learning and conceptual change and to examine how interaction and conceptual learning are related in the context of virtual environments developed primarily for informal educational settings. As a first step to this study, a set of exploratory experiments was carried out with children aged 7–12. The children were asked to complete tasks, such as the assembly of ancient columns from parts, which were designed to promote constructivist learning and explore the methods of carrying out in-depth experiments with children. This paper describes the analysis of these exploratory case studies from an Activity Theory perspective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
The online database ‘Theory into Practice’ presents and provides references for over fifty different theories on learning, http://www.tip.psychology.org/theories.html [last accessed: April 2006].
The CAVE (CAVE Automatic Virtual Environment) is a Registered Trademark of the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, originally designed by the Electronic Visualization Laboratory of the University of Illinois at Chicago (http://www.evl.uic.edu). Although the VR display actually used for these experiments was not an original CAVE, for the purpose of brevity and simplicity, we will be using the word CAVE throughout the paper when referring to it.
References
Barab SA, Hay K, Barnett MG (1999) Virtual solar system project: building understanding through model building. In: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, AERA, Montreal, Canada
Bødker S (1990) Through the interface: a human activity approach to user interface design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Brogni A, Slater M, Steed A (2003) More breaks less presence. In: Sixth Annual International Workshop on Presence
Engeström Y (1987) Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki
Gabbard JL, Hix D, SwanII J (1999) User-centered design and evaluation of virtual environments. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 19(6):51–59
Harel I (1991) Children designers. Interdisciplinary constructions for learning and knowing mathematics in a computer-rich school. Ablex, Norwood
Jonassen DH, Rohrer-Murphy L (1999) Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educ Technol Res Dev 47(1):61–79
Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Kuuti K (1996) Activity theory as a potential framework for human–computer interaction research. In: Nardi BA (ed) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human–computer interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 17–44
Markopoulos P, Bekker M (2003) On assessing usability testing methods for children. Interact Comput 15(3):141–150
Marshall E, Nichols S, Wilson JR (2003) Interactivity, control of movement and realism: establishing the factors influencing virtual reality training. In: HCI International 2003. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Crete II:1188–1192
McMillan SJ (2002) Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: users, documents, and systems. In: Lievrouw L, Livingston S (eds) Handbook of new media. Sage, London, pp 162–182
Nardi BA (ed) (1996) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human–computer interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge
Otero N, Rogers Y, du Boulay B (2001) Is interactivity a good thing? Assessing its benefits for learning. In: Nineth international conference on HCI. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Orleans, pp 790–794
Pares N, Pares R (2001) Interaction-driven virtual reality application design. A particular case El ball del fanalet or lightpools. PRESENCE Teleop Virt Environ 10(2):236–245
Park C, Ko H, Kim I-J, Ahn SC, Kwon Y-M, Kim H-G (2002) The making of Kyongju VR theatre. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Orlando, pp 269–271
Rafaeli S (1988) Interactivity: from new media to communication. In: Hawkins RP, Wieman JM, Pingree S (eds) Sage annual review of communication research: advancing communication science: merging mass and interpersonal processes, vol 16. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 110–134
Roussou M (2004) Interactivity and conceptual learning in virtual environments for children. In: ACM SIGCHI 2004 (CHI ‘04: Human Factors in Computing Systems) Extended Abstracts. ACM, Vienna, Austria, pp 1049–1050
Roussou M (2006) Interactivity and learning: examining primary school children’s activity within virtual environments. PhD thesis, University College London
Roussou M, Oliver M, Slater M (2006) The virtual playground: an educational virtual reality environment for evaluating interactivity and conceptual learning. J Virt Real 10(3–4):227–240. http://www.springerlink.com/content/8ptk37170086544h/, published online: 5 October 2006
Roussou M, Slater M (2005) A virtual playground for the study of the role of interactivity in virtual learning environments. In: PRESENCE 2005: the 8th Annual International Workshop on Presence. International Society for Presence Research, London, UK, pp 245–253
Scaife M, Rogers Y (2001) Informing the design of a virtual environment to support learning in children. Int J Hum Comput Stud special issue on User Centred Design and Implementation of Virtual Environment 55:115–143
Schell J, Shochet J (2001) Designing interactive theme park rides. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 21(4):11–13
Skinner BF (1950) Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev 57(4):193–216
Slavin RE (1994) Educational psychology theory and practice. Allyn & Bacon, Boston
Steuer J (1992) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun 42(4):73–93
van Kesteren IEH, Bekker MM, Vermeeren AP, Lloyd PA (2003) Assessing usability evaluation methods on their effectiveness to elicit verbal comments from children subjects. In: Interaction design and children preston. ACM, England, pp 41–49
Von Glaserfeld E (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick P (ed) The invented reality. W. Norton, New York, pp 17–40
Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Wiig EH, Wiig KM (1999) On conceptual learning. Working paper 1999-1 KRI WP 1999-1, Knowledge Research Institute, Arlington
Youngblut C (1998) Educational uses of virtual reality technology. Technical Report IDA Document D-2128, Institute for Defense Analyses
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the children and their parents who participated in the exploratory studies. Many thanks are due to George Drettakis and his group (Alexandre Mangon-Olivier, in particular), Dimitris Christopoulos, George Papaioannou, and Athanasios Gaitatzes for their help in creating the virtual environments and performing the experiments. We also thank Angela M. Sasse for her comments on the report that preceded this paper. The studies for this research have been approved by the UCL Committee on the Ethics of Non-NHS Human Research, Study No. 0171/001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roussou, M., Oliver, M. & Slater, M. Exploring activity theory as a tool for evaluating interactivity and learning in virtual environments for children. Cogn Tech Work 10, 141–153 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0070-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0070-3