Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-item lot-sizing with joint set-up costs

  • FULL LENGTH PAPER
  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a multi-item lot-sizing problem with joint set-up costs and constant capacities. Apart from the usual per unit production and storage costs for each item, a set-up cost is incurred for each batch of production, where a batch consists of up to C units of any mix of the items. In addition, an upper bound on the number of batches may be imposed. Under widely applicable conditions on the storage costs, namely that the production and storage costs are nonspeculative, and for any two items the one that has a higher storage cost in one period has a higher storage cost in every period, we show that there is a tight linear program with O(mT 2) constraints and variables that solves the joint set-up multi-item lot-sizing problem, where m is the number of items and T is the number of time periods. This establishes that under the above storage cost conditions this problem is polynomially solvable. For the problem with backlogging, a similar linear programming result is described for the uncapacitated case under very restrictive conditions on the storage and backlogging costs. Computational results are presented to test the effectiveness of using these tight linear programs in strengthening the basic mixed integer programming formulations of the joint set-up problem both when the storage cost conditions are satisfied, and also when they are violated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anily S. and Tzur M. (2005). Shipping multiple-items by capacitated vehicles—an optimal dynamic programming approach. Transportation Sci. 39: 233–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anily S. and Tzur M. (2006). Algorithms for the multi-item capacitated dynamic lot sizing problem. Naval Res. Logistics 53: 157–169

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Anily, S., Tzur, M., Wolsey, L.A.: Multi-item lot-sizing with joint set-up cost, CORE Discussion Paper DP 2005/70, Louvain-la-Neuve, 2005 (revised November 2006) (2005)

  4. Bitran G.R. and Yanasse H.H. (1982). Computational complexity of the capacitated lot size problem. Manage. Sci. 28: 1174–1186

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Eppen G.D. and Martin R.K. (1987). Solving multi-item lot-sizing problems using variable definition. Oper. Res. 35: 832–848

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Federgruen A. and Tzur M. (1991). A simple forward algorithm to solve general dynamic lot-size models with n periods in O(n log n) or O(n) time. Manage. Sci. 37: 909–925

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Florian M. and Klein M. (1971). Deterministic production planning with concave costs and capacity constraints. Manage. Sci. 18: 12–20

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Florian M., Lenstra J.K. and Rinnooy K.A.N. (1980). Deterministic production planning: Algorithms and complexity. Manage. Sci. 26: 669–679

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee C.Y. (1989). A solution to the multiple set-up problem with dynamic demand. IIE Trans. 21: 266–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Levi, R., Lodi, A., Sviridenko, M.: Approximation algorithms for the multi-item capacitated lot-sizing problem via flow cover inequalities, Report, 5th Feb. 2007 (2007)

  11. Levi R., Roundy R.O. and Shmoys D.B. (2006). Primal-dual algorithms for deterministic inventory problems. Math. Oper. Res. 31: 267–284

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller A. and Wolsey L.A. (2003a). Tight MIP formulations for multi-item discrete lot-sizing problems. Oper. Res. 51: 557–565

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller A. and Wolsey L.A. (2003b). Tight formulations for some simple mixed integer programs and convex objective integer programs. Math. Program. B 98: 73–88

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pochet Y. and Wolsey L.A. (1993). Lot-sizing with constant batches: Formulation and valid inequalities. Math. Oper. Res. 18: 767–785

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Pochet Y. and Wolsey L.A. (1994). Polyhedra for lot-sizing with Wagner–Whitin costs. Math. Program. 67: 297–324

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Pochet Y. and Wolsey L.A. (2006). Production Planning by Mixed Integer Programming. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. van Hoesel C.P.M. and Wagelmans A.P.M. (1996). An O(T 3) algorithm for the economic lot-sizing problem with constant capacities. Manage. Sci. 42: 142–150

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Vyve M. and Wolsey L.A. (2006). Approximate extended formulations. Math. Program. B 105: 501–522

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Wagelmans A.P.M., van Hoesel C.P.M. and Kolen A.W.J. (1992). Economic lot-sizing: an O(n log n) algorithm that runs in linear time in the Wagner–Whitin case. Oper. Res. 40: 145–156

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolsey L.A. (2002). Solving multi-item lot-sizing problems with an MIP solver using classification and reformulation. Manage. Sci. 48: 1587–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence A. Wolsey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anily, S., Tzur, M. & Wolsey, L.A. Multi-item lot-sizing with joint set-up costs. Math. Program. 119, 79–94 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-007-0202-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-007-0202-9

Keywords

Navigation