Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evaluation of debris flow and landslide hazards using ensemble framework of Bayesian- and tree-based models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The modeling and prediction of land movement susceptibility hazards, i.e., debris flow, landslide, and rock fall, can assist in controlling and preventing a variety of societal and environmental damages. The purpose of this study was to develop a land movement susceptibility hazard model of debris flow, landslide, and multiple land movement, i.e., combination of debris flow and landslide in the Saveh city of Markazi Province, Iran, using an ensemble of Bayesian generalized linear model (BGLM), sparse partial least squares (SPLS), boosted tree (BT), and random forest (RF) algorithms. For this purpose, 167 debris flow points, 261 landslide points, and 257 multiple (debris flow and landslide) points were identified based on field visits and available information, and 15 suitable conditioning factors were prepared as independent variables for this study. The accuracy and efficiency of the models were assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and other statistical indices. The variable importance result indicates that slope is the most important factor in debris flow (25.53), landslide (31.39), and multiple hazard (41.90) occurrences. The accuracy assessment results in the validation phase revealed that the RF is the most optimal among the applied algorithms, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.90, 0.94, and 0.89 for debris flow, landslide, and multiple (D + L) hazard modeling. The findings of this study indicated that the use of a Bayesian and tree-based ensemble model in preparing a land movement-related disaster map could be useful among policymakers and land use planners for sustainable land use management and practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Aditian A, Kubota T, Shinohara Y (2018) Comparison of GIS-based landslide susceptibility models using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network in a tertiary region of Ambon, Indonesia. Geomorphology 318:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghda SMF, Bagheri V, Razifard M (2018) Landslide susceptibility mapping using fuzzy logic system and its influences on mainlines in lashgarak region, Tehran, Iran. Geotech Geol Eng 36:915–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Abadi AM, Shahid S (2015) A comparison between index of entropy and catastrophe theory methods for mapping groundwater potential in an arid region. Environ Monit Assess 187:576

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Env 58:21–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos GG, Fatichi S, Burlando P (2015) An advanced process-based distributed model for the investigation of rainfall-induced landslides: the effect of process representation and boundary conditions. Water Resour Res 51:7501–7523

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabameri A, Karimi-Sangchini E, Pal SC et al (2020) Novel credal decision tree-based ensemble approaches for predicting the landslide susceptibility. Remote Sens 12:3389. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12203389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabameri A, Pourghasemi HR, Yamani M (2017) Applying different scenarios for landslide spatial modeling using computational intelligence methods. Environ Earth Sci 76:832

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabameri A, Pradhan B, Rezaei K, Lee C-W (2019) Assessment of landslide susceptibility using statistical- and artificial intelligence-based FR–RF integrated model and multiresolution DEMs. Remote Sens 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11090999

  • Arabameri A, Rezaie F, Pal SC et al (2021) Modelling of piping collapses and gully headcut landforms: evaluating topographic variables from different types of DEM. Geosci Front 101230

  • Avand M, Janizadeh S, Naghibi SA et al (2019) A comparative assessment of random forest and k-nearest neighbor classifiers for gully erosion susceptibility mapping. Water 11:2076

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai S-B, Wang J, Lü G-N et al (2010) GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology 115:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Band SS, Janizadeh S, Chandra Pal S et al (2020a) Novel ensemble approach of deep learning neural network (DLNN) model and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for prediction of gully erosion susceptibility. Sensors 20:5609. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20195609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Band SS, Janizadeh S, Chandra Pal S et al (2020b) Flash flood susceptibility modeling using new approaches of hybrid and ensemble tree-based machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing 12:3568. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswajeet P, Saied P (2010) Comparison between prediction capabilities of neural network and fuzzy logic techniques for L and slide susceptibility mapping. Disaster Adv 3:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloechl A, Braun B (2005) Economic assessment of landslide risks in the Swabian Alb, Germany? research framework and first results of homeowners’ and experts’ surveys

  • Breiman L (2001) Random Forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Ho T-C, Pradhan B et al (2016) GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks. Environ Earth Sci 75:1101

    Google Scholar 

  • Caine N (1980) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geogr Ann Ser B 62:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao C, Wang Q, Chen J et al (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping in vertical distribution law of precipitation area: case of the Xulong Hydropower station Reservoir, Southwestern China. Water 8:270

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabortty R, Pal SC, Chowdhuri I et al (2020) Assessing the importance of static and dynamic causative factors on erosion potentiality using SWAT, EBF with uncertainty and plausibility, logistic regression and novel ensemble model in a sub-tropical environment. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 1–25

  • Chen W, Chai H, Zhao Z et al (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on GIS and support vector machine models for the Qianyang County, China. Environ Earth Sci 75:474

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Hong H, Panahi M et al (2019a) Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using GIS-based data mining techniques of ANFIS with whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and grey wolf optimizer (GWO). Appl Sci 9:3755

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Li W, Hou E et al (2015) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and index of entropy models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping for the Baozhong Region of Baoji, China. Arab J Geosci 8:1829–1841

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Naghibi SA (2018) Prioritization of landslide conditioning factors and its spatial modeling in Shangnan County, China using GIS-based data mining algorithms. Bull Eng Geol Env 77:611–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H et al (2017a) A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on the rotation forest ensemble and na{\"\i}ve Bayes tree classifiers for a landslide susceptibility assessment in Langao County, China. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 8:1955–1977

  • Chen W, Xie X, Wang J et al (2017b) A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. CATENA 151:147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Yan X, Zhao Z et al (2019b) Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using data mining-based kernel logistic regression, naive Bayes and RBFNetwork models for the Long County area (China). Bull Eng Geol Env 78:247–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X-W, Liu M (2005) Prediction of protein–protein interactions using random decision forest framework. Bioinformatics 21:4394–4400

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Chen W, Chandra Pal S et al (2021) Evaluation efficiency of hybrid deep learning algorithms with neural network decision tree and boosting methods for predicting groundwater potential. Geocarto Int 1–21

  • Chowdhuri I, Pal S, Arabameri A et al (2020) Ensemble approach to develop landslide susceptibility map in landslide dominated Sikkim Himalayan region, India. Environ Earth Sci 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09227-5

  • Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R et al (2021a) Torrential rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning and statistical methods of eastern Himalaya. Nat Hazards 1–26

  • Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R et al (2021b) Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using projected storm rainfall and land use in Himalayan region. Bull Eng Geol Environ 1–22

  • Chung CF (1998) Three Bayesian prediction models for landslide hazard. In: Proceedings of International Association for Mathematical Geology 1998 Annual Meeting

  • Clerici A, Perego S, Tellini C, Vescovi P (2002) A procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation by the conditional analysis method. Geomorphology 48:349–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Conforti M, Pascale S, Robustelli G, Sdao F (2014) Evaluation of prediction capability of the artificial neural networks for mapping landslide susceptibility in the Turbolo River catchment (northern Calabria, Italy). CATENA 113:236–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40:381–391

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong S (1993) SIMPLS: an alternative approach to partial least squares regression. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 18:251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb SK, El-Kadi AI (2009) Susceptibility assessment of shallow landslides on Oahu, Hawaii, under extreme-rainfall events. Geomorphology 108:219–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Denuit M, Hainaut D, Trufin J (2019) Bayesian Neural Networks and GLM. In: Effective Statistical Learning Methods for Actuaries III. Springer, pp 43–61

  • Di Napoli M, Carotenuto F, Cevasco A et al (2020) Machine learning ensemble modelling as a tool to improve landslide susceptibility mapping reliability. Landslides 17:1897–1914

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich WE, Bellugi D, De Asua RR (2001) Validation of the shallow landslide model, SHALSTAB, for forest management. Water Science and Application 2:195–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Q, Chen W, Hong H (2017) Application of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and evidential belief function models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int 32:619–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling CA, Santi PM (2014) Debris flows and their toll on human life: a global analysis of debris-flow fatalities from 1950 to 2011. Nat Hazards 71:203–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2011) Landslide risk assessment based on GIS multi-criteria evaluation: a case study in Bostan-Abad County, Iran. Journal of Earth Science and Engineering 1:66–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Wan CF, Cyganiewicz J, Foster M (2003) Time for development of internal erosion and piping in embankment dams. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129:307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 1189–1232

  • Fuentes J, Poncela P, Rodr\’\iguez J (2015) Sparse partial least squares in time series for macroeconomic forecasting. J Appl Economet 30:576–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemain B, Asl DT, Pham BT et al (2020) Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between classification and regression tree and reduced error pruning tree algorithms. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences

  • Glade T (2003) Landslide occurrence as a response to land use change: a review of evidence from New Zealand. CATENA 51:297–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz JN, Brenning A, Petschko H, Leopold P (2015) Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput Geosci 81:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Golkarian A, Naghibi SA, Kalantar B, Pradhan B (2018) Groundwater potential mapping using C5. 0, random forest, and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in GIS. Environ Monit Assess 190:149

  • Gómez-Gutiérrez Á, Conoscenti C, Angileri SE et al (2015) Using topographical attributes to evaluate gully erosion proneness (susceptibility) in two mediterranean basins: advantages and limitations. Nat Hazards 79:291–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1703-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gounaridis D, Chorianopoulos I, Symeonakis E, Koukoulas S (2019) A random forest-cellular automata modelling approach to explore future land use/cover change in Attica (Greece), under different socio-economic realities and scales. Sci Total Environ 646:320–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftlang KK, Lang KKH (2003) The book of Iran: a survey of the geography of Iran. Alhoda UK

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Buja A (1994) Flexible discriminant analysis by optimal scoring. J Am Stat Assoc 89:1255–1270

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Highland L, Bobrowsky PT others (2008) The landslide handbook: a guide to understanding landslides. US Geological Survey Reston

  • Hong H, Pradhan B, Xu C, Bui DT (2015) Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines. CATENA 133:266–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Reid ME, LaHusen RG (1997) Debris-flow mobilization from landslides. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 25:85–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Janizadeh S, Pal SC, Saha A et al (2021) Mapping the spatial and temporal variability of flood hazard affected by climate and land-use changes in the future. J Environ Manage 298:113551

  • Jebur MN, Pradhan B, Tehrany MS (2014) Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale. Remote Sens Environ 152:150–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadavi PR, Lee C-W, Lee S (2018) Application of ensemble-based machine learning models to landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sens 10:1252

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantar B, Pradhan B, Naghibi SA et al (2018) Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Geomat Nat Haz Risk 9:49–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantar B, Ueda N, Al-Najjar HAH et al (2019) An evaluation of landslide susceptibility mapping using remote sensing data and machine learning algorithms in Iran. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences 4

  • Kalantar B, Ueda N, Saeidi V et al (2020) Landslide susceptibility mapping: machine and ensemble learning based on remote sensing big data. Remote Sens 12:1737

    Google Scholar 

  • Kariminejad N, Hosseinalizadeh M, Pourghasemi HR et al (2019) Evaluation of factors affecting gully headcut location using summary statistics and the maximum entropy model: Golestan Province, NE Iran. Sci Total Environ 677:281–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritikos T, Davies T (2015) Assessment of rainfall-generated shallow landslide/debris-flow susceptibility and runout using a GIS-based approach: application to western Southern Alps of New Zealand. Landslides 12:1051–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Kim J-C, Jung H-S et al (2017) Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 8:1185–1203

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Chen J, Zhang Y et al (2020) Debris flow susceptibility assessment and runout prediction: a case study in Shiyang Gully, Beijing, China. Int J Environ Res 14:365–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Masetic Z, Subasi A (2016) Congestive heart failure detection using random forest classifier. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 130:54–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC, Runger GC, Hubele NF (2009) Engineering statistics. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Brandon MT (2002) Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges. Earth Planet Sci Lett 201:481–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi HR, Avand MT, Janizadeh S (2019) landslide susceptibility survey using modeling methods. In: Elsevier. pp 259–276

  • Nadim F, Kjekstad O, Peduzzi P et al (2006) Global landslide and avalanche hotspots. Landslides 3:159–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo PTT, Panahi M, Khosravi K et al (2021) Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran. Geosci Front 12:505–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulos EI, Anagnostou EN, Borga M et al (2011) Sensitivity of a mountain basin flash flood to initial wetness condition and rainfall variability. J Hydrol 402:165–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Nouraliee J, Porkhial S, Mohammadzadeh Moghaddam M et al (2015) Investigation of density contrasts and geologic structures of hot springs in the Markazi Province of Iran using the gravity method. Russ Geol Geophys 56:1791–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2015.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlmacher GC, Davis JC (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng Geol 69:331–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir A (2011) Using a binary logistic regression method and GIS for evaluating and mapping the groundwater spring potential in the Sultan Mountains (Aksehir, Turkey). J Hydrol 405:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal M, Maity R (2019) Development of a spatially-varying statistical soil moisture profile model by coupling memory and forcing using hydrologic soil groups. J Hydrol 570:141–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Chowdhuri I (2019) GIS-based spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using frequency ratio model of Lachung River basin, North Sikkim, India. SN Appl Sci 1:416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0422-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Das B, Malik S (2019) Potential landslide vulnerability zonation using integrated analytic hierarchy process and GIS technique of upper rangit catchment area, west sikkim, India. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-01009-2

  • Pal SC, Arabameri A, Blaschke T et al (2020) Ensemble of machine-learning methods for predicting gully erosion susceptibility. Remote Sens 12:3675. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Roy P et al (2021) Changing climate and land use of 21st century influences soil erosion in India. Gondwana Res 94:164–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Choi C, Kim B, Kim J (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea. Environ Earth Sci 68:1443–1464

    Google Scholar 

  • Persichillo MG, Bordoni M, Meisina C (2017) The role of land use changes in the distribution of shallow landslides. Sci Total Environ 574:924–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT (2018) A novel classifier based on composite hyper-cubes on iterated random projections for assessment of landslide susceptibility. J Geol Soc India 91:355–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT, Khosravi K, Prakash I (2017) Application and comparison of decision tree-based machine learning methods in landside susceptibility assessment at Pauri Garhwal Area, Uttarakhand, India. Environmental Processes 4:711–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Jirandeh AG, Pradhan B et al (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran. Journal of Earth System Science 122:349–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Kariminejad N, Amiri M et al (2020) Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique. Sci Rep 10:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Kerle N (2016) Random forests and evidential belief function-based landslide susceptibility assessment in Western Mazandaran Province, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 75:185

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin, Iran. Catena 97:71–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Rossi M (2017) Landslide susceptibility modeling in a landslide prone area in Mazandarn Province, north of Iran: a comparison between GLM, GAM, MARS, and M-AHP methods. Theoret Appl Climatol 130:609–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Yousefi S, Kornejady A, Cerdà A (2017) Performance assessment of individual and ensemble data-mining techniques for gully erosion modeling. Sci Total Environ 609:764–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Mansor S, Pirasteh S, Buchroithner MF (2011) Landslide hazard and risk analyses at a landslide prone catchment area using statistical based geospatial model. Int J Remote Sens 32:4075–4087

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy P, Chakrabortty R, Chowdhuri I et al (2020) Development of different machine learning ensemble classifier for gully erosion susceptibility in Gandheswari Watershed of West Bengal, India. In: Machine Learning for Intelligent Decision Science. Springer, pp 1–26

  • Saha A, Pal SC, Arabameri A et al (2021a) Flood susceptibility assessment using novel ensemble of hyperpipes and support vector regression algorithms. Water 13:241. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A, Pal SC, Arabameri A et al (2021b) Optimization modelling to establish false measures implemented with ex-situ plant species to control gully erosion in a monsoon-dominated region with novel in-situ measurements. J Environ Manage 287:112284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A, Pal SC, Santosh M et al (2021c) Modelling multi-hazard threats to cultural heritage sites and environmental sustainability: the present and future scenarios. J Clean Prod 128713

  • Santo A, Di Crescenzo G, Forte G et al (2018) Flow-type landslides in pyroclastic soils on flysch bedrock in southern Italy: the Bosco de’Preti case study. Landslides 15:63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Minaei M, Shahabi H, Hagenauer J (2019) Big data in geohazard; pattern mining and large scale analysis of landslides in Iran. Earth Sci Inf 12:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Simoni S, Zanotti F, Bertoldi G, Rigon R (2008) Modelling the probability of occurrence of shallow landslides and channelized debris flows using GEOtop-FS. Hydrological Processes: an International Journal 22:532–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkel L (1976) The role of extreme (catastrophic) meteorological events in contemporary evolution of slopes. Geomorphology and Climate 203–246

  • Sun X, Chen J, Bao Y et al (2018) Landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression analysis along the jinsha river and its tributaries close to Derong and Deqin County, Southwestern China. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 7:438

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley RJ, Smith CL, Gale JD, Woodward P (2015) Advantages of a wholly Bayesian approach to assessing efficacy in early drug development: a case study. Pharm Stat 14:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Waters C, Orgill S et al (2018) Estimating soil organic carbon stocks using different modelling techniques in the semi-arid rangelands of eastern Australia. Ecol Ind 88:425–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z-Y, Lee JHW, Melching CS (2015) Debris flows and landslides. In: Wang Z-Y, Lee JHW, Melching CS (eds) River Dynamics and Integrated River Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 193–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JP, Gallant JC (2000) Terrain analysis; principles and applications, Jhon Wiley&Sons. Inc USA

  • Wu Y, Li W, Wang Q et al (2016) Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio, statistical index and certainty factor models for the Gangu County, China. Arab J Geosci 9:84

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong K, Adhikari BR, Stamatopoulos CA et al (2020) Comparison of different machine learning methods for debris flow susceptibility mapping: a case study in the Sichuan Province, China. Remote Sens 12:295

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahav I, Shmueli G, Mani D (2015) A tree-based approach for addressing self-selection in impact studies with big data. Yahav, I, Shmueli, G, & Mani, D(2016) A tree-based approach for addressing self-selection in impact studies with big data MIS Quarterly 40:819–848

  • Yalcin A, Bulut F (2007) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and digital photogrammetric techniques: a case study from Ardesen (NE-Turkey). Nat Hazards 41:201–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat—Turkey). Comput Geosci 35:1125–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi S, Pourghasemi HR, Emami SN et al (2020) A machine learning framework for multi-hazards modeling and mapping in a mountainous area. Sci Rep 10:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghi ZS, Al-Katheeri MM (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Landslides 13:839–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Wu X, Niu R et al (2017) The assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and decision tree methods in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Environ Earth Sci 76:405

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Ge T, Tian W, Liou Y-A (2019) Debris flow susceptibility mapping using machine-learning techniques in shigatse area, china. Remote Sens 11:2801

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Staudenmayer J, Coull BA, Wand MP (2006) General design Bayesian generalized linear mixed models. Stat Sci 35–51

  • Zhou J, Cui P, Yang X (2013) Dynamic process analysis for the initiation and movement of the Donghekou landslide-debris flow triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake. J Asian Earth Sci 76:70–84

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan, West Bengal, India

    Subodh Chandra Pal, Rabin Chakrabortty & Asish Saha

  2. Department of Watershed Management Engineering and Sciences, Faculty in Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran University, Tehran, 14174-14418, Iran

    Saeid Khosrobeigi Bozchaloei

  3. Institute of Applied Technology, Thu Dau Mot University, Binh Duong province, Vietnam

    Quoc Bao Pham

  4. Faculty of Water Resource Engineering, Thuyloi University, 175 Tay Son, Dong Da, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam

    Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh

  5. HUTECH University, 475A, Dien Bien Phu, Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Duong Tran Anh

  6. Department of Watershed Management Engineering and Sciences, Faculty in Natural Resources and Marine Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, Iran

    Saeid Janizadeh

  7. Department of Forestry, Faculty in Natural Resources and Marine Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, Iran

    Kourosh Ahmadi

Authors
  1. Subodh Chandra Pal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rabin Chakrabortty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asish Saha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saeid Khosrobeigi Bozchaloei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Quoc Bao Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Duong Tran Anh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Saeid Janizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kourosh Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duong Tran Anh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pal, S.C., Chakrabortty, R., Saha, A. et al. Evaluation of debris flow and landslide hazards using ensemble framework of Bayesian- and tree-based models. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81, 55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02546-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02546-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation