Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

TBM performance estimation using a classification and regression tree (CART) technique

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With widespread increasing applications of mechanized tunneling in almost all ground conditions, prediction of tunnel boring machine (TBM) performance is required for time planning, cost control and choice of excavation method in order to make tunneling economical. Penetration rate is a principal measure of full-face TBM performance and is used to evaluate the feasibility of the machine and predict the advance rate of an excavation. In this study, a database of actual machine performance from T05 and T06 tunnels of the deep tunnel sewerage system (DTSS) project in Singapore which include: rock mass uniaxial compressive strength, brittleness index (B i), volumetric joint account (J v), joint orientation (J o), TBM specifications and corresponding TBM performance has been compiled. Then, for prediction of specific rock mass boreability index (SRMBI), two different models including classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and multivariate regression analysis (MVRA) have been developed. As statistical indices, correlation coefficient (R 2), root mean square error (RMSE) and variance accounted for (VAF) were used to evaluate the efficiency of the developed models for determining the SRMBI of TBMs. According to the obtained results, it was observed that the performance of the CART model is better than the MVRA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ahangari K, Moeinossadat SR, Behnia D (2015) Estimation of tunneling-induced settlement by modern intelligent methods. Int J Soils Found 55(4):737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez Grima M, Bruines PA, Verhoef PNW (2000) Modeling tunnel boring machine performance by neuro-fuzzy method. Int J Tunn Undergr Space Technol 15(3):259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2000) TBM tunneling in jointed and faulted rock. Balkema, Brookfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Benato A, Oreste P (2015) Prediction of penetration per revolution in TBM tunneling as a function of intact rock and rock mass characteristics. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 74:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski von Preinl ZT, Celada Tamames B, Galera Fernandez JM, Alvarez Hernandez M (2006) Rock masse excavability indicator: new way to selecting the optimum tunnel construction method. Tunnel Undergr Sp Technol 21(3–4):237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blindheim OT, Bruland A (1998) Boreability testing. Norwegian TBM tunneling. Norwegian Tunnelling Society, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruland A (1998) Hard rock tunnel boring. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

  • Büchi E (2007) The influence of joints on TBM performance. Private communication

  • Delisio A, Zhao J (2014) A new model for TBM performance in blocky rock conditions. Int J Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 43:440–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili M, Salimi A, Drebenstedt C, Abbaszadeh M, Aghajani Bazzazi A (2014) Application of PCA, SVR, and ANFIS for modeling of rock fragmentation. Arab J Geosci 8(9):6881–6893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhing K (1995) Leistungs-und Verschleissprognosen in maschinellen Tunnelbau. Felsbau 13(6):439

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi E, Yagiz S, Ataei M (2014) Predicting penetration rate of hard rock tunnel boring machine using fuzzy logic. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholamnejad J, Tayarani N (2010) Application of artificial neural networks to the prediction of tunnel boring machine penetration rate. Min Sci Technol (China) 20(5):727–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh ATC, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Xiao Y, Xiang Y (2016) Determination of earth pressure balance tunnel-related maximum surface settlement: a multivariate adaptive regression splines approach. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s10064-016-0937-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong QM (2005) Development of a rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction. Ph.D. thesis, School of civil and environmental engineering, Nanayang Technological University, Singapore

  • Gong QM, Zhao J (2007) Influence of rock brittleness on TBM penetration rate in Singapore Granite. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 22:317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong QM, Zhao J (2009) Development of a rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(1):8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong QM, Zhao J, Jiang YS (2007) In situ TBM penetration tests and rock mass boreability analysis in hard rock tunnels. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 22(3):303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Khamehchiyan M, Bruland A (2009) Developing new equations for TBM performance prediction in carbonate-argillaceous rocks: a case history of Nowsood water conveyance tunnel. Int J Geomech Geoeng 4:287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Khamehchiyan M, Bruland A, Tavakoli HR (2010) TBM performance analysis in pyroclastic rocks, a case history of Karaj Water Conveyance Tunnel (KWCT). J Rock Mech Rock Eng 4:427–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Zhao J (2011) A new hard rock TBM performance prediction model for project planning. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 26:595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karami A, Afiuni-zadeh S (2012) Sizing of rock fragmentation modeling due to bench blasting using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and radial basis function. Int J Min Sci Technol 22:459–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal M, Monjezi M (2013) Prediction of flyrock in open pit blasting operation using machine learning method. Int J Min Sci Technol 23:313–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal M, Armaghani DJ, Faradonbeh RS, Yellishetty M, Abd Majid MZ, Monjezi M (2016) Classification and regression tree technique in estimating peak particle velocity caused by blasting. Eng Comput 1–9. doi:10.1007/s00366-016-0455-0

  • Kiers HAL, Rasson JP, Groenen PJF, Schader M (2000) Data analysis classification and related methods. In: International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), Namur, Belgium, p 428

  • Liang M, Mohamad ET, Faradonbeh RS, Armaghani AJ, Ghoraba S (2016) Rock strength assessment based on regression tree technique. Eng Comput 32(2):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdevari S, Shahriar K, Yagiz S, Akbarpour Shirazi M (2014) A support vector regression model for predicting tunnel boring machine penetration rates. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 72:214–229

    Google Scholar 

  • MATLAB (2006) Statistics toolbox for use with MATLAB, User’s guide version 5. The MathWorks, Inc

  • Michael JA, Gordon SL (1997) Data mining technique: for marketing, sales and customer support. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Monjezi M, Ahmadi M, Sheikhan M, Bahrami A, Salimi AR (2010) Predicting blast-induced ground vibration using various types of neural networks. Int J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1233–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monjezi M, Ghafurikalajahi M, Bahrami A (2011) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural networks. Int J Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 26:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myles AJ, Feudale RN, Liu Y, Woody NA, Brown SD (2004) An introduction to decision tree modeling. J Chemometr 18:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocak I, Seker SA (2013) Calculation of surface settlements caused by EPBM tunneling using artificial neural network, SVM, and Gaussian processes. Int J Environ Earth Sci 70:1263–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo S, Kfukui K, Chen W (2003) Expert system for applicability of tunnel boring machines in Japan. Rock Mech Rock Eng 36(4):305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramezanzadeh A (2005) Performance analysis and development of new models for performance prediction of hard rock TBMs in rock mass. Ph.D. thesis, INSA, Lyon, France

  • Rostami J (1997) Development of a force estimation model for rock fragmentation with disc cutters through theoretical modeling and physical measurement of crushed zone pressure. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA

  • Rostami J, Ozdemir L, Nilsen B (1996) Comparison between CSM and NTH hard rock TBM performance prediction models. In: Proceedings, the annual conference of the Institution of Shaft Drilling Technology (ISDT), Las Vegas

  • Samui P (2008) Support vector machine applied to settlement of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils. Int J Comput Geotech 35:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samui P, Kurup P (2012) Multivariate adaptive regression spline and least square support vector machine for prediction of undrained shear strength of clay. Int J Appl Metaheuristic Comput 3(2):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundin NO, Wanstedt S (1994) In: Nelson P, Laubach SE (eds) Rock mechanics models and measurements: challenges from industry. Proceedings of the 1st North American Rock Mechanics Symposium. Balkema: Rotterdam, p 8

  • Thuro K, Plinninger RJ (2003) Hard rock tunnel boring, cutting, drilling and blasting: rock parameters for excavatability. In: Proceedings of the 10th international congress ISRM, South African Institute on Mineral Metallurgy, pp 1–7

  • Wang F, Gou B, Qin Y (2013) Modeling tunneling-induced ground surface settlement development using a wavelet smooth relevance vector machine. Int J Comput Geotech 54:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witten I, Frank E, Hall M (2011) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagiz S (2002) Development of rock fracture and brittleness indices to quantify the effects of rock mass features and toughness in the CSM Model basic penetration for hard rock tunneling machines. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mining and Earth Systems Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA

  • Yilmaz I, Yuksek G (2009) Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of gypsum using multiple regression, ANN, and ANFIS models. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(4):803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author wishes to extend sincere thanks to Prof. Q. M. Gong for sharing the TBM database in this study. We are also grateful to reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscripts and their many helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Monjezi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salimi, A., Faradonbeh, R.S., Monjezi, M. et al. TBM performance estimation using a classification and regression tree (CART) technique. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77, 429–440 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0969-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0969-0

Keywords

Navigation