Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Body size illusions influence perceived size of objects: a validation of previous research in virtual reality

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research indicates that the size of the own body affects the judgment of objects’ size, depending on the amount of subjective ownership toward the body (Van der Hoort et al. in PLOS ONE 6(5):e20195, 2011). We are the first to transfer this own-body-size effect into a virtual environment. In a series of three experiments, participants (N = 68) had to embody small, medium, and large avatars and judge the size of objects. Body ownership was manipulated using synchronous and asynchronous touch. We also included a new paradigm with an additional change of perspective to induce stronger ownership (Experiment 2). Additionally, we assessed whether the visibility of the body during the judgment phase influenced the results (Experiment 3). In all three experiments, we found an overestimation in a small and an underestimation in a large body compared to a medium body. However, size estimation did not depend on the degree of ownership despite clear differences in self-reported ownership. Our results show that a virtual reality scenario does not require a visuotactile manipulation of ownership in order to evoke the own-body-size effect. Our validation of the effect in a virtual setting may be helpful for the design of clinical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Banakou D, Groten R, Slater M (2013) Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(31):12846–12851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391(6669):756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox PF (Producer), Johnston J (Director) (1999) Honey, I shrunk the kids [motion picture]. Walt Disney Pictures, Burbank

  • De Vignemont F (2011) Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Conscious Cogn 20(1):82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobricki M, de la Rosa S (2013) The structure of conscious bodily self-perception during full-body illusions. PLoS ONE 8(12):e83840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-García M, Gutiérrez-Maldonado J (2012) The use of virtual reality in the study, assessment, and treatment of body image in eating disorders and nonclinical samples: a review of the literature. Body Image 9(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • First MB (2005) Desire for amputation of a limb: paraphilia, psychosis, or a new type of identity disorder. Psychol Med 35(6):919–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2008) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95(9):1088–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris LR, Carnevale MJ, D’Amour S, Fraser LE, Harrar V, Hoover AE et al (2015) How our body influences our perception of the world. Front Psychol 6:819

    Google Scholar 

  • IJsselsteijn WA, de Kort YAW, Haans A (2006) Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality. Presence Teleop Virt 15(4):455–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keizer A, van Elburg A, Helms R, Dijkerman HC (2016) A virtual reality full body illusion improves body image disturbance in anorexia nervosa. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0163921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilteni K, Normand JM, Sanchez-Vives MV, Slater M (2012) Extending body space in immersive virtual reality: a very long arm illusion. PLoS ONE 7(7):e40867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klevjer R (2012) Enter the avatar: the phenomenology of prosthetic telepresence in computer games. In: Sageng J, Fossheim H, MandtLarsen T (eds) The philosophy of computer games. Philosophy of engineering and technology, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinara E, Kilteni K, Blom KJ, Slater M (2016) First person perspective of seated participants over a walking virtual body leads to illusory agency over the walking. Sci Rep 6:28879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkenauger SA, Leyrer M, Bülthoff HH, Mohler BJ (2013) Welcome to wonderland: the influence of the size and shape of a virtual hand on the perceived size and shape of virtual objects. PLoS ONE 8(7):e68594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo MR, Haggard P (2012) What is it like to have a body? Curr Dir Psychol Sci 21(2):140–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo MR, Schüür F, Kammers MP, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2008) What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107(3):978–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Knapp JM (2003) Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. Virtual Adapt Environ 11:21–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Maister L, Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Tsakiris M (2013) Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition 128(2):170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini M, Perez-Marcos D, Sanchez-Vives MV (2014) Modulation of pain threshold by virtual body ownership. Eur J Pain 18(7):1040–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maselli A, Slater M (2013) The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Front Hum Neurosci 7:83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maselli A, Slater M (2014) Sliding perspectives: dissociating ownership from self-location during full body illusions in virtual reality. Front Hum Neurosci 8:693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohler BJ, Creem-Regehr SH, Thompson WB, Bülthoff HH (2010) The effect of viewing a self-avatar on distance judgments in an HMD-based virtual environment. Presence Teleop Virt 19(3):230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray CD, Pettifer S, Howard T, Patchick EL, Caillette F, Kulkarni J, Bamford C (2007) The treatment of phantom limb pain using immersive virtual reality: three case studies. Disabil Rehabil 29(18):1465–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normand JM, Giannopoulos E, Spanlang B, Slater M (2011) Multisensory stimulation can induce an illusion of larger belly size in immersive virtual reality. PLoS ONE 6(1):e16128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomo P, Borrego A, Cebolla A, Llorens R, Demarzo M, Baños RM (2017) Subjective, behavioral, and physiological responses to the rubber hand illusion do not vary with age in the adult phase. Conscious Cogn 58:90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkova VI, Björnsdotter M, Gentile G, Jonsson T, Li TQ, Ehrsson HH (2011a) From part-to whole-body ownership in the multisensory brain. Curr Biol 21(13):1118–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkova VI, Khoshnevis M, Ehrsson HH (2011b) The perspective matters! Multisensory integration in ego-centric reference frames determines full-body ownership. Front Psychol 2:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piryankova IV, Wong HY, Linkenauger SA, Stinson C, Longo MR, Bülthoff HH, Mohler BJ (2014) Owning an overweight or underweight body: distinguishing the physical, experienced and virtual body. PLoS ONE 9(8):e103428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulton EC (1989) Bias in quantifying judgments. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt DR, Linkenauger SA (2013) Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression. In: Prinz W, Beisert M, Herwig A (eds) Action science: foundations of an emerging discipline. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 171–198

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renner RS, Velichkovsky BM, Helmert JR (2013) The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments—a review. ACM Comput Surv 46(2):23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries B, Interrante V, Kaeding M, Anderson L (2008) The effect of self-embodiment on distance perception in immersive virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology. ACM, pp 167–170

  • Rohde M, Di Luca M, Ernst MO (2011) The rubber hand illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS ONE 6(6):e21659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater M, Spanlang B, Sanchez-Vives MV, Blanke O (2010) First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS ONE 5(5):e10564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2005) The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31(1):80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoort B, Ehrsson HH (2014) Body ownership affects visual perception of object size by rescaling the visual representation of external space. Atten Percept Psychophys 76(5):1414–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Hoort B, Ehrsson HH (2016) Illusions of having small or large invisible bodies influence visual perception of object size. Sci Rep 6:34530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoort B, Guterstam A, Ehrsson HH (2011) Being Barbie: the size of one’s own body determines the perceived size of the world. PLoS ONE 6(5):e20195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibel D, Schmutz J, Pahud O, Wissmath B (2015) Measuring spatial presence: introducing and validating the pictorial presence SAM. Presence Teleop Virt 24(1):44–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9(4):625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee N, Bailenson J (2007) The Proteus effect: the effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Hum Commun Res 33(3):271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Laura Durrer for her contributions to the final design and for recruiting and testing participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland

    Stefan Weber, Fred W. Mast & David Weibel

  2. Swiss Distance Learning University, Überlandstrasse 12, P.O. Box 265, 3900, Brig, Switzerland

    Stefan Weber

Authors
  1. Stefan Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fred W. Mast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Weibel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Weber.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Participants were treated according to the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki), and informed consent was obtained.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Ownership questionnaire

Appendix: Ownership questionnaire

Questions

  • During the experiment, there were times when …

  • … I felt as if the avatar’s body was my body (ownership).

  • … I had the feeling that I was looking at myself (ownership).

  • … it seemed as though the touch I felt was caused by the object touching the avatar (ownership).

  • … I had the feeling that I was lying in the same location as the avatar (location).

  • … I felt I could move the avatar, if I wanted to (agency).

  • … I felt as if I had two bodies (control question).

  • … the avatar began to resemble my own body in terms of shape, skin tone, or some other visual feature (control question).

Answer scale

  • Fully disagree O 1 O 2 O 3 O 4 O 5 O 6 O 7 Fully agree

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weber, S., Mast, F.W. & Weibel, D. Body size illusions influence perceived size of objects: a validation of previous research in virtual reality. Virtual Reality 24, 385–397 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00402-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00402-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation