Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Proprioceptively displayed interfaces: aiding non-visual on-body input through active and passive touch

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On-body input interfaces that can be used accurately without visual attention could have a wide range of applications where vision is needed for a primary task: emergency responders, pilots, astronauts, and people with vision impairments could benefit by making interfaces accessible. This paper describes a between-participant study (104 participants) to determine how well users can locate e-textile interface discrete target touch points on the forearm without visual attention. We examine whether the addition of active touch embroidery and passive touch nubs (metal snaps with vibro-tactile stimulation) helps in locating input touch points accurately. We found that touch points towards the middle of the interface on the forearm were more difficult to touch accurately than at the ends. We also found that the addition of vibro-tactile stimulation aids in the accuracy of touch interactions by over 9% on average, and by almost 17% in the middle of the interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

De-identified data may be available upon request.

References

  1. Ashbrook DL, Clawson JR, Lyons K, Patel N, Starner T (2008) Quickdraw: the impact of mobility and on-body placement on device access time. Proceedings of CHI 2008. pp 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357092

  2. Bergstrom-Lehtovirta J, Boring S, Hornbæk K (2017) Placing and recalling virtual items on the skin. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, pp 1497–1507. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026030

  3. Castano LM, Flatau AB (2014) Smart fabric sensors and e-textile technologies : A review. Smart Mater Struct 23. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/23/5/053001

  4. Cholewiak RW, Collins AA (1995) Vibrotactile pattern discrimination and communality at several body sites. Percept Psychophys 57(6):724–737. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Craig JC, Evans PM (1987) Vibrotactile masking and the persistence of tactual features. Perception & Psychophysics 42(4):309–317. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunne L, Profita H, Zeagler C (2014) Social aspects of wearability and interaction. In: Sazonov E, Neuman M (eds) Wearable sensors: Fundamentals, implementation and applications. Elsevier Inc, pp 25–43

  7. Dunne LE, Profita H, Zeagler C, Clawson J, Gilliland S, Do EY-L, Budd J (2014) The social comfort of wearable technology and gestural interaction. 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. EMBC 2014

  8. Gemperle F, Kasabach C, Stivoric J, Bauer M, Martin R (1998) Design for wearability. Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers

  9. Gibson J (1962) Observations on active touch. Psychological Review 69(6):477–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilliland S, Komor N, Starner T, Zeagler C (2010) The textile interface swatchbook: Creating graphical user interface-like widgets with conductive embroidery. IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC, Seoul, South Korea 20(10):1–8

  11. Gustafson S, Rabe B, Baudisch P (2013) Understanding palm - based imaginary interfaces : The role of visual and tactile cues when browsing. CHI

  12. Hamdan NAH, Blum JR, Heller F, Kosuru RK, Borchers J (2016) Grabbing at an angle: Menu selection for fabric interfaces. ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 1–7

  13. Harrison C, Tan D, Morris D (2010) Skinput : Appropriating the body as an input surface. CHI 453–462

  14. Hart SG (2006) Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 50(9):904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacquard by Google: https://atap.google.com/jacquard/. Accessed 22 Dec 2020

  16. Komor N, Gilliland S, Clawson J, Bhardwaj M, Garg M, Zeagler C, Starner T (2009) Is it gropable?–assessing the impact of mobility on textile interfaces. IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC, Linz, Austria, pp 71–74

  17. Lee S (2012) Buzzwear: Supporting multitasking with wearable tactile displays on the wrist. Georgia Institute of Technology

  18. Lin S-Y, Su C-H, Cheng K-Y, Liang R-H, Kuo T-H, Chen B-Y (2011) PUB - Point Upon Body : Exploring eyes-free interaction and methods on an arm. UIST 2011:481–487

  19. Loomis JM, Lederman SJ (1984) What utility is there in distinguishing between active and passive touch. Psychonomic Society Meeting, San Antonio, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lopes P, Ion A, Mueller W, Hoffmann D, Jonell P, Baudisch P (2015) Proprioceptive Interaction. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, South Korea, pp 939–948

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marculescu D, Marculescu R (2003) Electronic textiles: A platform for pervasive computing. Proceedings of the IEEE 91(12):1995–2018

  22. Molla TI, Goodman S, Schleif N, Berglund ME, Zacharias C, Compton C, Dunne LE (2017) Surface-mount manufacturing for E-textile circuits. International Symposium on Wearable Computers Maui, Hawaii, pp 18–25

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ni T, Baudisch P (2009) Disappearing mobile devices. Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, Victoria, BC, Canada, pp 101–110

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nolan MF (1982) Two-point discrimination assessment in the upper limb in young-adult men and women. Physical Therapy 62(7):965–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oakley I, Kim Y, Lee J, Ryu J (2006) Determining the feasibility of forearm mounted vibrotactile displays. Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality 2006:74. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Olwal A, Moeller J, Priest-Dorman G, Starner T, Carroll B (2018) I/O braid: Scalable touch-sensitive lighted cords using spiraling, repeating sensing textiles and fiber optics. UIST 2018 - Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Berlin, Germany, 485–497

  27. Pasquero J (2006) Survey on communication through touch. Technical Report TR-CIM, Center for Intelligent Machines-McGill University, pp 1–28

  28. Post ER, Orth M (1997) Smart fabric, or “wearable clothing”. IEEE First International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC, Boston, MA, USA, pp 167–168

  29. Post ER, Orth M, Russo PR, Gershenfeld N (2000) E-broidery: Design and fabrication of textile-based computing. IBM Syst J 39(3.4):840–860. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.393.0840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Profita H, Clawson J, Gilliland S, Zeagler C, Starner T, Budd J, Do EYL (2013) Don’t mind me touching my wrist: A case study of interacting with on-body technology in public. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers - ISWC ’13, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rincon-Gonzalez L, Buneo CA, Tillery SIH (2011) The proprioceptive map of the arm is systematic and stable, but idiosyncratic. PLoS ONE 6(11):4–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schiffman HR (2001) The skin senses. Sensation and perception. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp 412–449

  33. Shieldex Threads. http://www.shieldextrading.net/products/yarns-threads/. Accessed 31 March 2017

  34. Walters K, Lee S, Starner T, Leibrandt R, Lawo M (2010) Touchfire: Towards a glove-mounted tactile display for rendering temperature readings for firefighters. IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC, Seoul, South, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  35. Weber EH (1978) De subtilitate tactus [The sense of touch]. HE Ross & DH Murray (eds) HE Ross, Trans

  36. Weigel M, Lu T, Bailly G, Oulasvirta A, Majidi C, Steimle J (2015) iSkin : Flexible, stretchable and visually customizable on-body touch sensors for mobile computing. CHI 2991–3000

  37. Weinstein S (1968) Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality. The skin senses. In: Kenshalo DR (ed) Charles C Thomas, pp 195–222

  38. Weng W, Chen P, He S, Sun X, Peng H (2016) Smart electronic textiles. Angewandte Chemie International edition, pp 6140–6169. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201507333

  39. Zeagler C (2017) Where to wear it : Functional, technical, and social considerations in on - body location for wearable technology 20 years of designing for wearability. International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Maui, Hawaii

  40. Zeagler C, Gandy M, Baker PMA (2018) The assistive wearable: Inclusive by design. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits (ATOB) 12, Summer 2018 (2018), 11–36

  41. Zeagler C, Gilliland S, Audy S, Starner T (2013) Can i wash it?: The effect of washing conductive materials used in making textile based wearable electronic interfaces. ISWC 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers

  42. Zeagler C, Gilliland S, Profita H, Starner T (2012) Textile interfaces: Embroidered jog-wheel, beaded tilt sensor, twisted pair ribbon, and sound sequins. IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC, Newcastle, England, pp 60–63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The contents of this article were developed under a grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant number 90RE5025). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this article do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

Funding

Partially funded by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research NIDILRR Wireless RERC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Clint Zeagler, Peter Presti, Elizabeth Mynatt, Thad Starner & Melody Moore Jackson

Authors
  1. Clint Zeagler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Presti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elizabeth Mynatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thad Starner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Melody Moore Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Not Applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clint Zeagler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

All studies involving human research participants were approved by Georgia Institute of Technology IRB.

Consent to participate

All participants were given a consent form before their participation which outlined the minimal risks involved in participating in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Code availability

Code can be made available to reviewers upon request.

Disclaimer

The contents of this article do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeagler, C., Presti, P., Mynatt, E. et al. Proprioceptively displayed interfaces: aiding non-visual on-body input through active and passive touch. Pers Ubiquit Comput 25, 551–569 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01507-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01507-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation