Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

A robust device for large-scale monitoring of bar soap usage in free-living conditions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work reports the development and evaluation of a robust and easily deployable soap use logging device. The waterproof device contains motion and sound sensors and can be fully embedded in commercial bar soap. At rest, the device is in a low-power mode and the recording of data is triggered by vibrations measured by a tilt switch. Monitoring soap usage is used to support behaviour change interventions, with the aim to reduce contact diseases. Following the algorithm development under laboratory conditions, we evaluate the performance of the logging device under free-living conditions in 58 low-income households in India. In addition to the measurement by logger soaps, washing activity was recorded by observers. These data allow us to quantify the error of soap use detection. Further, the study data are used to train and evaluate an algorithm for the discrimination of soap use associated with hand and body wash. The results show that the soap logger provides an unobtrusive and objective measure of free-living soap usage. The analysis of the activity features reveals a novel hygienic habit, which is important information for the design of bespoke interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zillmer R (2007) Measurement of toothbrushing behaviour in a natural environment. Pers Ubiquit Comput. doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0481-1

  2. Claessen JP, Bates S, Sherlock K, Seeparsand F, Wright R (2008) Designing interventions to improve tooth brushing. Int Dental J 58:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ram PK, Halder AK, Granger SP, Jones T, Hall P, Hitchcock D, Wright R, Nygren B, Islam MS, Molyneaux JW, Luby SP (2010) Is structured observation a valid technique to measure handwashing behaviour? Use of acceleration sensors embedded in soap to access reactivity to structured observation. Am J Trop Med Hyg 83(5):1070–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, Rudan I, Campbell H, Cibulskis R, Li M, Mathers C, Black, RE, Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group of WHO and UNICEF (2012) Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet 379(9832):2151–2161

    Google Scholar 

  5. Curtis V, Cairncross S (2003) Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the community: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 3(5):275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ejemot-Nwadiaro RI, Ehiri JE, Meremikwu MM, Critchley JA (2008) Hand washing for preventing diarrhoea. Cochrane Database System Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004265.pub2

  7. Rabie T, Curtis V (2006) Evidence that handwashing prevents respiratory tract infection: a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health 11(3):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouten CVC, Koekkoek KTM, Verduin M, Kodde R, Janssen JD (1997) A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44(3):136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang S, Rowlands AV, Murray P, Hurst TL (2011) Physical activity classification using the GENEA Wrist-Worn accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44(4):742–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan Z, Chakraborty D, Misra A, Hoyoung J, Aberer K (2012) SAMMPLE: detecting semantic indoor activities in practical settings using locomotive signatures. In: Proceedings on international symposium on wearable computers (ISWC), 2012. doi:10.1109/ISWC.2012.22

  11. Maekawa T, Kishino Y, Yanagisawa Y, Sakurai Y (2012) Mimic sensors: battery-shaped sensor node for detecting electrical events of handheld devices. Pervasive 2012, LNCS 7319. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 20–38

  12. Judah G, Aunger R, Schmidt WP, Michie S, Granger S, Curtis V (2009) Experimental pretesting of hand-washing interventions in a natural setting. Am J Public Health 99(2):405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boscart VM, McGilton KS, Levchenko S, Hufton G, Holliday P, Fernie GR (2009) Acceptability of a wearable hand hygiene device with monitoring capabilities. J Hosp Infect 70(3):216–222

    Google Scholar 

  14. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rüdiger Zillmer.

Additional information

The authors are indebted to Peter Hall and Adam Biran for running the Kerala study and Adam Russell and Chris Catterall who helped with the sensor design and processing of the study data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zillmer, R., Wright, R., Bates, S. et al. A robust device for large-scale monitoring of bar soap usage in free-living conditions. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 2057–2064 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0760-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0760-9

Keywords

Navigation