Multimodal support to group dynamics

1. Doyle M, Straus D (1993) How to make meetings work. The Berkley Publishing Group, New York

   Google Scholar 

2. Andersen C (2000) A theoretical framework for examining peer collaboration in preservice teacher education. In: Proceedings of the 2000 annual international conference of the association for the education of teachers in science

3. Bloom G, Castagna C, Warren B (2006) More than mentors: principal coaching. Leadership. May/June [cited 05/05/2006]. Available at: http://www.acsa.org/

4. Boud D, Keogh R, Walker D (1985) Reflection: turning experience into learning. Kogan Page, London

   Google Scholar 

5. Tang JC (1991) Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. Int J Man-Mach Stud 34:143–160

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Dourish P, Bly S (1992) Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computer systems CHI’92

7. Erickson T, Halverson C, Kellogg W.A, Laff M, Wolf T (2002) Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible. Commun ACM 45(4):40–44

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. DiMicco JM, Pandolfo A, Bender W (2004) Influencing group participation with a shared display. CSCW 2004:614–623

   Google Scholar 

9. Maloney-Krichmar D, Preece J (2005) A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 12(2):201–232

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Waibel A, Steusloff H, Stiefelhagen R (2004) CHIL: computer in the human interaction loop. In: NIST ICASSP meeting recognition workshop, Montreal, Canada

11. McCowan I, Gatica-Perez D, Bengio S, Moore D, Bourlard H (2004) Towards computer understanding of human interactions. In: Aarts E, Collier R, van Loenen E, de Ruyter B (eds) Ambient intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 235–251

    Google Scholar 

12. Kaiser E, Demirdjian D, Gruenstein A, Li X, Niekrasz J, Wesson M, Kumar S (2004) A multimodal learning interface for sketch, speak and point creation of a schedule Chart. In: Proceedings of ICMI 2004, pp 329–330

13. Brdiczka O, Maisonnasse J, Reignier P (2005) Automatic detection of interaction groups. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on multimodal interface, Trento, Italy

14. Wilson J, Rosenberg D (1988) Rapid prototyping for user interface design. In Helander M (eds) Handbook of human–computer interaction, New York, pp 859–875

15. Hall JW, Watson WH (1970) The effects of a normative intervention on group decision-making performance. Hum Relat 23(4):299–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Garrison B (2003) The perceived credibility of electronic mail in newspaper newsgathering. In: Proceedings of communication technology and policy division, Association for Educational in Journalism and Mass Communication Midwinter Conference, Boulder, Colorado

17. Benne K.D, Sheats P (1948) Functional roles of group members. J Soc Issues 4:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Bales R.F (1970) Personality and interpersonal behaviour. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

19. Falcon V, Leonardi C, Not E, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M (2005) Observing multimodal behaviour to support group dynamics. In: Workshop on user-centred design and evaluation of services for human–human communication and collaboration held in conjunction with ICMI’05, Trento, Italy

20. Cohen JA (1960) Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measure 20(1):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

22. Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

23. Carli G, Gretter G (1992) A start-end point detection algorithm for a real-time acoustic front-end based on DSP32C VME board. In: Proceedings of ICSPAT, Boston, USA

24. Chippendale P (2006) Towards automatic body language annotation. International conference on automatic face and gesture recognition—FG2006 (IEEE) Southampton, UK, pp 487–492

25. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2000) Support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

26. Hsu C-W, Lin C-JA (2002) Comparison of methods for multi-class support vector machines. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Kressel U (1999) Pairwise classification and support vector machines. In: Scholkopf B, Burges CJC, Smola AJ (eds) Advances in Kernel methods—support vector learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

28. Zancanaro M, Lepri B, Pianesi F (2006) Automatic detection of group functional roles in face to face interactions. In: Proceedings of international conference of multimodal interfaces ICMI-06

29. McKeown KR (1985) Text generation: using discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language text. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

30. Halliday MAK, Hasan R (1985) Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press, Geelong

31. Callaway C, Not E, Stock O (2006) Report generation for post-visit summaries in museum environments. In: Stock O, Zancanaro M (eds) PEACH: intelligent interfaces for museum visits. Cognitive technologies series. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 71–92

    Google Scholar 

32. Bales RF (1976) Interaction process analysis: a method for the study of small groups. University of Chicago press, Chicago

33. Bales RF, Cohen SP (1979) SYMLOG: a system for the multiple level observation of groups. Collier Macmillan Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

34. DiMicco JM (2005) Changing small group interaction through visual reflections of social behaviour. PhD Thesis, MIT Media Lab

35. Losada M, Markovitch S (1990) GroupAnalyzer: a system for dynamic analysis of group interaction. In: Proceedings of 23rd Hawaii international conference for system sciences, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, pp 101–110

Download references