Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past decade, our group has approached interaction design from an industrial design point of view. In doing so, we focus on a branch of design called “formgiving”Footnote 1. Traditionally, formgiving has been concerned with such aspects of objects as form, colour, texture and material. In the context of interaction design, we have come to see formgiving as the way in which objects appeal to our senses and motor skills. In this paper, we first describe our approach to interaction design of electronic products. We start with how we have been first inspired and then disappointed by the Gibsonian perception movement [1], how we have come to see both appearance and actions as carriers of meaning, and how we see usability and aesthetics as inextricably linked. We then show a number of interaction concepts for consumer electronics with both our initial thinking and what we learnt from them. Finally, we discuss the relevance of all this for tangible interaction. We argue that, in addition to a data-centred view, it is also possible to take a perceptual-motor-centred view on tangible interaction. In this view, it is the rich opportunities for differentiation in appearance and action possibilities that make physical objects open up new avenues to meaning and aesthetics in interaction design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7a–i
Fig. 7j–u
Fig. 8a–j
Fig. 9a–h
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Whilst formgiving is somewhat of a neologism in English, many other European languages do have a separate word for form-related design, including German (Gestaltung), Danish (formgivnin), Swedish (formgivning) and Dutch (vormgeving).

References

  1. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  2. Øritslund TA, Buur J (2000) Taking the best from a company history—designing with interaction styles. In: Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems (DIS2000), New York City, New York, August 2000, pp 27–38

  3. Cooper A (1999) The inmates are running the asylum: why high tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Sams, Indianapolis, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  4. Norman DA (1999) The invisible computer. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson RI (2000) Conversations with Clement Mok and Jakob Nielsen, and with Bill Buxton and Clifford Nass. Interactions 7(1):46–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Norman DA (1990) The design of everyday things. Doubleday Currency, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gaver W (1996) Affordances for interaction: the social is material for design. Ecol Psychol 8(2):111–129

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smets GJF (1994) Industrial design engineering and the theory of direct perception. Des Stud 15:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Norman DA (1999) Affordances, conventions and design. Interactions 6(3):38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Torenvliet G (2003) We can’t afford it! Interactions 10(4):12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Djajadiningrat JP, Overbeeke CJ, Wensveen SAG (2002) But how, Donald, tell us how? On the meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback. In: Macdonald N (ed) Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems (DIS2002), London, 25–28 June 2002, pp 285–291

  12. Krippendorff K, Butter R (1984) Product semantics: exploring the symbolic qualities of form. Innovation. J Ind Des Soc Am 3(2):4–9

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aldersey-Williams H, Wild L, Boles D, McCoy K, McCoy M, Slade R, Diffrient N (1990) The new cranbrook design discourse. Rizzoli, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dunne A, Raby F (2001) Design noir: the secret life of electronic objects. Princeton Architectural Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maeda J (1999) Design by numbers. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  16. Houde S, Salomon G (1993) Working towards rich and flexible representations. In: Adjunct proceedings of the joint conference of ACM SIGCHI and INTERACT (INTERCHI’93), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 1993, pp 9–10

  17. Dourish P (2001) Where the action is: the foundations of embodied intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  18. Underkoffler J, Ullmer B, Ishii H (1999) Emancipated pixels: real-world graphic in the luminous room. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH‘99), Los Angeles, California, 8–13 August 1999

  19. Wensveen SAG, Djajadiningrat JP, Overbeeke CJ (2004) Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward. Accepted for DIS2004, Cambridge, Massachusetts, August 2004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Guiard Y (1987) Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav 19(4):486–517

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buxton W, Myers B (1986) A study in two-handed input. In: Proceedings of the CHI’86 conference on human factors in computing systems, Boston, Massachusetts, 13–17 April 1986, pp 321–326

  22. Gribnau MW, Hennessey JM (1998) Comparing one- and two-handed input for a 3D object assembly task. In: Proceedings of the CHI’98 conference on human factors in computing systems, Los Angeles, California, April 1998

  23. Buur J, Jensen MV, Djajadiningrat JP (2004) Hands-only scenarios and video action walls—novel methods for tangible user interaction design. Accepted for DIS2004, Cambridge, Massachusetts, August 2004

  24. Damasio AR (1995) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Avon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Picard RW (1997) Affective computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wensveen SAG, Overbeeke CJ, Djajadiningrat JP (2002) Push me, shove me and I know how you feel. Recognising mood from emotionally rich interaction. In: Macdonald N (ed) Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems (DIS2002), London, 25–28 June 2002, pp 335–340

  27. Ullmer B, Ishii H (2001) Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. In: Carroll JM (ed) Human–computer interaction in the new millenium. Addison-Wesley, Boston, Massachusetts, pp 579–601

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ishii H, Ullmer B (1997) Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: Proceedings of the CHI’97 conference on human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, Georgia, March 1997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our former colleagues at the ID-Studiolab of the Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering at the Delft University of Technology—in particular, Caroline Hummels and Rob Luxen—for their contributions and the many valuable discussions. We gratefully acknowledge Prof. Dr. Don Bouwhuis of the Eindhoven J.F. Schouten School for User-System Interaction Research for providing the sponsorship for the colour illustrations in this article. We also gratefully acknowledge Aletta Stevens for the correction of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Industrial Design, Designed Intelligence Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Den Dolech 2, Hg 3.71, P.O. Box 513, 5600MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Tom Djajadiningrat, Stephan Wensveen, Joep Frens & Kees Overbeeke

Authors
  1. Tom Djajadiningrat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephan Wensveen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joep Frens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kees Overbeeke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Djajadiningrat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Djajadiningrat, T., Wensveen, S., Frens, J. et al. Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action. Pers Ubiquit Comput 8, 294–309 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004-0293-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004-0293-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation