Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of factors affecting dance training effects based on reinforcement learning

  • S.I on NC for Industry 4.0
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The traditional dance training process lacks a certain degree of scientificity due to the lack of precise motion capture and analysis system, which directly affects the final training effect. In view of the robust limitations of the type 1 fuzzy reinforcement learning flexible structure control system to the uncertainty of noise interference, based on the reinforcement learning algorithm, this paper proposes a flexible structure controller based on the type 2 fuzzy reinforcement learning algorithm. Moreover, this paper uses fuzzy sets with equidistant fuzzy centers to divide large-scale state or continuous state space into two types of fuzzy divisions, divide the action space uniformly, and build fuzzy rules based on the basic ideas of type 1 fuzzy reinforcement learning. In addition, this paper constructs an evaluation system for factors affecting dance training effects based on reinforcement learning and designs experiments to verify the performance of the system. The research results show that the system constructed in this paper meets the theoretical needs and can be applied to dance training practice later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Agethen P, Otto M, Mengel S et al (2016) Using marker-less motion capture systems for walk path analysis in paced assembly flow lines. Procedia Cirp 54(1):152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang H, Wang L, Chu S et al (2016) Application of optical motion capture technology in power safety entitative simulation training system. Opt Photon J 06(8):155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang SK, Xie H, Hu B (2014) Research on protection property of running sportswear fabrics based on 3-D motion capture system. Textiles Light Ind Sci Technol 3(2):57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miura T, Kaiga T, Shibata T et al (2017) Low-dimensional feature vector extraction from motion capture data by phase plane analysis. J Inform Process 25(6):884–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frost DM, Beach TAC, Campbell TL et al (2016) Can the functional movement screen be used to capture changes in spine and knee motion control following 12 weeks of training? Phys Ther Sport 23(6):50–57

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang A, Yan XK, Liu AG (2016) An introduction to a newly-developed, “acupuncture needle manipulation training-evaluation system” based on optical motion capture technique. Acupunct Res 41(6):556–559

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holden D, Saito J, Komura T (2016) A deep learning framework for character motion synthesis and editing. ACM Trans Gr 35(4):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin CH (2015) A research on 3D motion database management and query system based on kinect. Lecture Notes Electr Eng 329(1):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shan H, Liu Y (2015) Feature recognition of body dance motion in sports dancing. Metall Min Ind 7(7):290–297

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou L, Bai S, Li Y (2017) Energy optimal trajectories in human arm motion aiming for assistive robots. Model Identif Control (MIC) 38(1):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xia Q, Zhang M, Gao D et al (2017) Range of hip joint motion and weight of lower limb function under 3D dynamic marker. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi 33(6):595–598

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang CS, Wang LH, Kuo LC et al (2017) Comparison of breast motion at different levels of support during physical activity. J Hum Sport Exercise 12(4):1256–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Zhan Y, Wang X (2017) A two-phase low-level motion data segmentation method based on relative position. J Jiangsu Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 38(2):186–191

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spector JT, Lieblich M (2017) Letter regarding ‘comparison between low-cost marker-less and high-end marker-based motion capture systems for the computer-aided assessment of working ergonomics’ by Patrizi et al and research reproducibility. Ergonomics 60(4):597–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cahill-Rowley K, Rose J (2017) Temporal-spatial reach parameters derived from inertial sensors: comparison to 3D marker-based motion capture. J Biomech 52(1):11–16

  16. Ancillao A, Savastano B, Galli M et al (2017) Three dimensional motion capture applied to violin playing: a study on feasibility and characterization of the motor strategy. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 149(2):19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Komisar V, Novak AC, Haycock B (2016) A novel method for synchronizing motion capture with other data sources for millisecond-level precision. Gait Posture 51(3):125–131

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sá F, Marques A, Rocha NBF et al (2015) Kinematic parameters of throwing performance in patients with schizophrenia using a markerless motion capture system. Somatosens Res 32(2):77–86

  19. Pablongel-López J, Arzola de la Peńa N (2015) Kinematic hand analysis using motion capture technology. IFMBE Proc 49(6):257–260

  20. Kim MK, Kim TY, Lyou J (2015) Performance Improvement of an AHRS for motion capture. J Inst Control 21(12):1167–1172

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou ZM, Chen ZW (2015) A survey of motion capture data earning as high dimensional time series. Int J Multimed Ubiquitous Eng 10(9):17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khan MA (2016) Multiresolution coding of motion capture data for real-time multimedia applications. Multimed Tools Appl 76(15):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  23. Puupponen A, Wainio T, Burger B et al (2015) Head movements in finnish sign language on the basis of motion capture data: a study of the form and function of nods, nodding, head thrusts, and head pulls. Sign Lang Linguist 18(1):41–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee Y, Yoo H (2016) Low-cost 3D motion capture system using passive optical markers and monocular vision. Optik Int J Light Electron Opt 130(2):1397–1407

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rahman MM (2017) Analysis of finger movements of a pianist using magnetic motion capture system with six dimensional position sensors. Trans Virtual Reality Soc Jpn 15(3):243–250

    Google Scholar 

  26. Park SW, Park HS, Kim JH et al (2015) 3D displacement measurement model for health monitoring of structures using a motion capture system. Measurement 59(5):352–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Giannetti R, Petrella A, Bach J et al (2017) In vivo bone position measurement using high-frequency ultrasound validated with 3-D optical motion capture systems: a feasibility study. J Med Biol Eng 37(7):1–8

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Xin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xin, L. Evaluation of factors affecting dance training effects based on reinforcement learning. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 6773–6785 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06032-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06032-4

Keywords

Navigation