Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Double graphs-based discriminant projections for dimensionality reduction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Graph embedding plays an important role in dimensionality reduction for processing the high-dimensional data. In graph embedding, its keys are the different kinds of graph constructions that determine the performance of dimensionality reduction. Inspired by this fact, in this article we propose a novel graph embedding method named the double graphs-based discriminant projections (DGDP) by integrating two designed discriminative global graph constructions. The proposed DGDP can well discover the discriminant and geometrical structures of the high-dimensional data through the informative graph constructions. In two global graph constructions, we consider the geometrical distribution of each point on each edge of the graphs to define the adjacent weights with class information. Moreover, in the weight definition of one graph construction, we further strengthen pattern discrimination among all the classes to design the weights of the corresponding adjacent graph. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed DGDP, we experimentally compare it with the state-of-the-art graph embedding methods on several data sets. The experimental results show that the proposed graph embedding method outperforms the competing methods with more power of data representation and pattern discrimination in the embedded subspace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. https://www.cs.ucr.edu/eamonn/time_series_data/.

  2. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/index.php.

  3. http://www2.ece.ohio-state.edu/~aleix/ARdatabase.html.

  4. https://fei.edu.br/~cet/facedatabase.html.

  5. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/dtg/attarchive/face-database.html.

  6. http://www4.comp.polyu.edu.hk/biometrics/.

  7. https://www.kaggle.com/bistaumanga/usps-dataset.

References

  1. Belhumeur PN, Hespanha JP, Kriegman DJ (1997) Eigenfaces versus Fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(7):711–720

    Google Scholar 

  2. He X, Yan S, Hu Y (2005) Face recognition using laplacianfaces. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27(3):328–340

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gao Q, Xu S, Chen F, Ding C (2018) \(R_{1}\)-2-DPCA and face recognition. IEEE Trans Cybern 49(4):1212–1223

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lu Y, Yuan C, Li X (2018) Structurally incoherent low-rank 2DLPP for image classification. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 29(6):1701–1714

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li W, Feng F, Li H (2018) Discriminant analysis-based dimension reduction for hyperspectral image classification: a survey of the most recent advances and an experimental comparison of different techniques. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag 6(1):15–34

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feng F, Li W, Du Q, Zhang B (2017) Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral image with graph-based discriminant analysis considering spectral similarity. Remote Sens 9(4):323. https://doi.org/10.3390/sr9040323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li W, Du Q (2016) Laplacian regularized collaborative graph for discriminant analysis of hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(12):7066–7076

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li W, Liu J, Du Q (2016) Sparse and low rank graph-based discriminant analysis for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(7):4094–4105

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim K (2018) An improved semi-supervised dimensionality reduction using feature weighting: application to sentiment analysis. Expert Syst Appl 109:49–65

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ma Y, Wu X (2018) Discriminant sparse and collaborative preserving embedding for bearing fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing 313:259–270

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yan S, Xu D, Zhang B (2007) Graph embedding and extensions: a general framework for dimensionality reduction. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(1):40–51

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lai Z, Xu Y, Yang J (2017) Rotational invariant dimensionality reduction algorithms. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(11):3733–3746

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goyal P, Ferrara E (2018) Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: a survey. Knowl Based Syst 151:78–94

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cai H, Zheng V, Chang K (2017) A comprehensive survey of graph embedding: problems, techniques and applications. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 30(9):1616–1637

    Google Scholar 

  15. Turk M, Pentland A (1991) Face recognition using eigenfaces. In: computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 586–591

  16. Martinez A, Kak A (2001) PCA versus LDA. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 23(2):228–233

    Google Scholar 

  17. He X, Niyogi P (2003) Locality preserving projections. In: neural information processing systems, pp 153–160

  18. Lai Z, Xu Y, Chen Q, Yang J (2014) Multilinear sparse principal component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 25(10):1942–1950

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smallman L, Artemiou A, Morgan J (2018) Sparse generalised principal component analysis. Pattern Recognit 83:443–455

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mi J, Zhang Y, Lai Z, Li W (2019) Principal component analysis based on nuclear norm minimization. Neural Netw 118:1–16

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wen J, Fang X, Cui J, Fei L (2019) Robust sparse linear discriminant analysis. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 29(2):390–403

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wan H, Wang H, Guo G (2017) Separability-oriented subclass discriminant analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 40(2):409–422

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng S, Ding C, Nie F (2019) Harmonic mean linear discriminant analysis. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 31(8):1520–1531

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lu Y, Lai Z, Xu Y, Li X, Zhang D (2015) Low-rank preserving projections. IEEE Trans Cybern 46(8):1900–1913

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang H, Wu QJ, Chow TW, Zhao M (2012) A two-dimensional neighborhood preserving projection for appearance-based face recognition. Pattern Recognit 45(5):1866–1876

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang S, Xin Y, Kong D (2018) Unsupervised learning of human pose distance metric via sparsity locality preserving projections. IEEE Trans Multimedia 21(2):314–327

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen W, Li C, Shao Y, Zhang J (2019) 2DRLPP: Robust two-dimensional locality preserving projection with regularization. Knowl Based Syst 169:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang W, Xue X, Lu H (2006) Discriminant neighborhood embedding for classification. Pattern Recognit 39(11):2240–2243

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Gou J, Yi Z (2013) Locality-based discriminant neighborhood embedding. Comput J 56(9):1063–1082

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ding C, Zhang L (2015) Double adjacency graphs-based discriminant neighborhood embedding. Pattern Recognit 48(5):1734–1742

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang S, Ding C (2018) Dimensionality reduction via preserving local information. Future Gener Comput Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wong W, Zhao H (2012) Supervised optimal locality preserving projection. Pattern Recognit 45(1):186–197

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Gao Q, Liu J, Zhang H, Gao X, Li K (2013) Joint global and local structure discriminant analysis. IEEE Trans Inf Forens Secur 8(4):626–635

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang R, Nie F, Hong R (2017) Fast and orthogonal locality preserving projections for dimensionality reduction. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(10):5019–5030

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang Z, Huang P, Wan M (2018) Discriminant maximum margin projections for face recognition. Multimedia Tools Appl 78(17):23847–23865

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hajizadeh R, Aghagolzadeh A, Ezoji M (2020) Local distances preserving based manifold learning. Expert Syst Appl 139:112860

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yi Y, Wang J, Zhou W (2019) Joint graph optimization and projection learning for dimensionality reduction. Pattern Recognit 92:258–273

    Google Scholar 

  38. Xu Y, Zhong A, Yang J (2010) LPP solution schemes for use with face recognition. Pattern Recognit 43(12):4165–4176

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Wright J, Yang AY, Ganesh A (2008) Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31(2):210–227

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang L, Yang M, Feng X (2011) Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition?. In: International conference on computer vision (ICCV2011), pp 471–478

  41. Qiao L, Chen S, Tan X (2010) Sparsity preserving projections with applications to face recognition. Pattern Recognit 43(1):331–341

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Gui J, Sun Z, Jia W (2012) Discriminant sparse neighborhood preserving embedding for face recognition. Pattern Recognit 45(8):2884–2893

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Yuan S, Mao X, Chen L (2019) Sparsity regularization discriminant projection for feature extraction. Neural Process Lett 49(2):539–553

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gao Q, Wang Q, Huang Y (2015) Dimensionality reduction by integrating sparse representation and fisher criterion and its applications. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(12):5684–5695

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Gou J, Du L, Cheng K (2016) Discriminative sparsity preserving graph embedding. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, pp 4250–4257

  46. Gou J, Yi Z, Zhang D (2018) Sparsity and geometry preserving graph embedding for dimensionality reduction. IEEE Access 6:75748–75766

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yin J, Lai Z, Zeng W (2018) Local sparsity preserving projection and its application to biometric recognition. Multimedia Tools Appl 77(1):1069–1092

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yang W, Wang Z, Sun C (2015) A collaborative representation based projections method for feature extraction. Pattern Recognit 48(1):20–27

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yin J, Wei L, Song M (2016) Optimized projection for collaborative representation based classification and its applications to face recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 73:83–90

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hua J, Wang H, Ren M (2017) Collaborative representation analysis methods for feature extraction. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):225–231

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yuan M, Feng DZ (2019) Dimensionality reduction by collaborative preserving Fisher discriminant analysis. Neurocomputing 356:228–243

    Google Scholar 

  52. Huang P, Li T, Gao G (2018) Collaborative representation based local discriminant projection for feature extraction. Digital Signal Process 76:84–93

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61976107, 61672268, 61962010 and 61502208), International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program of China Postdoctoral Council (No. 20180051), Research Foundation for Talented Scholars of JiangSu University (Grant No. 14JDG037), Open Foundation of Artificial Intelligence Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province (Grant No. 2017RYJ04), Application Foundation of Sichuan Province (Grant No. 2018JY0386) Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province (Nos.[2017]1130 and [2017]5726-32), Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia of China (No. 2019AAC03122), and Key Science and Research Project of North Minzu University (No. 2019KJ43).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianping Gou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gou, J., Xue, Y., Ma, H. et al. Double graphs-based discriminant projections for dimensionality reduction. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 17533–17550 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04924-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04924-5

Keywords

Navigation