Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: An adaptive QoS computation for medical data processing in intelligent healthcare applications

  • Intelligent Biomedical Data Analysis and Processing
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 29 April 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Efficient computation of quality of service (QoS) during medical data processing through intelligent measurement methods is one of the mandatory requirements of the medial healthcare world. However, emergency medical services often involve transmission of critical data, thus having stringent requirements for network quality of service (QoS). This paper contributes in three distinct ways. First, it proposes the novel adaptive QoS computation algorithm (AQCA) for fair and efficient monitoring of the performance indicators, i.e., transmission power, duty cycle and route selection during medical data processing in healthcare applications. Second, framework of QoS computation in medical applications is proposed at physical, medium access control (MAC) and network layers. Third, QoS computation mechanism with proposed AQCA and quality of experience (QoE) is developed. Besides, proper examination of QoS computation for medical healthcare application is evaluated with 4–10 inches large-screen user terminal (UT) devices (for example, LCD panel size, resolution, etc.). These devices are based on high visualization, battery lifetime and power optimization for ECG service in emergency condition. These UT devices are used to achieve highest level of satisfaction in terms, i.e., less power drain, extended battery lifetime and optimal route selection. QoS parameters with estimation of QoE perception identify the degree of influence of each QoS parameters on the medical data processing is analyzed. The experimental results indicate that QoS is computed at physical, MAC and network layers with transmission power (− 15 dBm), delay (100 ms), jitter (40 ms), throughput (200 Bytes), duty cycle (10%) and route selection (optimal). Thus it can be said that proposed AQCA is the potential candidate for QoS computation than Baseline for medical healthcare applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Change history

References

  1. Eidenberger H (2012) Handbook of multimedia information retrieval: “the common methods of audio retrieval, biosignal processing, content-based image retrieval, face, text retrieval and video surveillance”. Austria

  2. Dimitrov DV (2016) Medical internet of things and big data in healthcare. Healthc Inform Res 22(3):156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reichl P, Egger S (2015) Towards a comprehensive framework for QoE and user behavior modeling. In: 7th international workshop on quality of multimedia experience

  4. ITU-T G 107 (2015) The e-model, a computational model for use in transmission planning. Geneva

  5. Sodhro AH, Pirbhulal S (2018) Power control algorithms for media transmission in remote healthcare systems. IEEE Access 6(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Awobuluyi O, Nightingale J (2015) Video quality in 5G networks: context-aware QoE management in the SDN control plane. In: IEEE international conference on computer and IT

  7. Chihani B, Laghari KR (2013) User-centric quality of experience measurement. In: International conference on mobile computing, applications and services. pp 33–46

  8. Yaacoub E, Dawy Z (2014) Fair optimization of video streaming quality of experience in LTE networks using distributed antenna systems and RRM. J Appl Math 2014(2014):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen X, Hwang J-N (2015) A near optimal QoE-driven power allocation scheme for scalable video transmissions over MIMO systems. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 9(1):76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang L, An N (2013) Power-aware wireless communication system design for body area networks. E Health Telecommun Syst Netw (ETSN) J 2(2):23–28

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yaacoub E, Filali F (2015) Enhancement of SVC video streaming over vehicular networks using cooperative LTE/802.11p Comm. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 9(1):37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sodhro AH, Zongwei L (2018) Mobile edge computing based QoS optimization in medical healthcare applications. Int J Inf Manag (IJIM) 18:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen C, Zhu X (2015) Rate adaptation and admission control for video transmission with subjective quality constraints. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 9(1):22–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu D, He C, Li Y (2013) Improving quality of experience in M-health monitoring system. In: 35th annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS Osaka, Japan

  15. Li Y, Qiao D, Xu Z, Xu D, Miao F (2012) Energy-model-based optimal communication systems design for wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 2012(2012):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sodhro AH, Pirbhulal S, Sodhro GH, Gurtov A, Muzammal M, Luo Z (2018) A joint transmission power control and duty-cycle approach for smart healthcare system. IEEE Sens J 99:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN (2000) PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101(23):215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Doutre MC, Nasiopoulos P (2012) Rendering 3-D high dynamic range images: subjective evaluation of tone-mapping methods and preferred 3-D image attributes. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 6(5):597–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martini MG, Chen CW, Zhu X (2012) QoE-awarewireless multimedia systems. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 30(7):53–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sodhro AH, Pirbhulal S (2018) Convergence of IoT and product lifecycle management in medical health care. Future Gener Comput Syst 86(2018):380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ojanper T, Uitto M (2014) QoE-based management of medical video transmission in wireless networks. In: IEEE/IFIP network operations and management symposium

  22. Laghari KUR, Pham TT, Nguyen H, Crespi N (2012) QoM: a new quality of experience framework for multimedia services. In: IEEE symposium on computers and communications (ISCC)

  23. Wen Y, Zhu X, Rodrigues JJPC (2014) Cloud mobile media: reflections and outlook. IEEE Trans Multimedia 16(4):885–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sodhro AH, Pirbhulal S, Sodhro GH (2018) An energy-efficient algorithm for wearable electrocardiogram signal processing in ubiquitous 3 healthcare applications. MDPI Sens 8(3):923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu Y, Zhao X (2014) Robust power control for underlay cognitive radio networks under probabilistic quality of service and interference constraints. IET Commun 8(18):3333–3340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kang J-W, Hussain A, Kim S-H et al (2015) Link scheduling schemes with on–off interference map for device to device communications. IET Commun 9(3):359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dai Z, Liu J, Wang C et al (2015) QoS-based device to device communication schemes in heterogeneous wireless networks. IET Commun 9(3):335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sodhro AH, Shaikh FK, Pirbhulal S, Lodro MM, Shah MA (2017) Medical-QoS based telemedicine service selection using analytic hierarchy process. In: Khan SU, Zomaya AY, Abbas A (eds) Handbook of large-scale distributed computing in smart healthcare. Springer, Cham, pp 589–609

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim HJ et al (2014) QoE assessment model for multimedia streaming services using QoS parameters. J Multimedia Tools Appl 72(2014):2163–2175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pal D, et al (2017) Effect of network QoS on user QoE for a mobile video streaming services using H.265/VP9 Codec. In: 8th international conference on advances in information technology (IAIT2016), vol 111(2017), pp 214–222

  31. Sodhro AH, Sekahri A, Ouzrout Y (2018) Energy-efficiency comparison between data rate control and transmission power control algorithms for wireless body sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw (IJDSN) 14(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  32. Floris A et al (2016) Managing the quality of experience in the multimedia internet of things: a layered-based approach. MDPI Sens 16(12):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mahmud R, et al (2018) Cloud-fog interoperability in IoT-enabled healthcare solutions, ICDCN’18, January 4–7, pp 1–10

  34. Li Y (2017) Edge computing-based access network selection for heterogeneous wireless networks. Networking and Internet Architecture [cs.NI]. Université Rennes 1

  35. Jridi M et al (2018) SoC-based edge computing gateway in the context of the internet of multimedia things: experimental platform. J. Low Power Electron Appl 8(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rahbari D, et al (2018) Scheduling of fog networks with optimized knapsack by symbiotic organisms search. In: Proceeding of the 21st conference of FRUCT association. pp 1–6

  37. Gomes SL, de Rebouças ES, Neto EC, Papa JP, de Albuquerque VHC (2017) Embedded real-time speed limit sign recognition using image processing and machine learning techniques. Neural Comput Appl 35(1):573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sodhro AH, Pirphulal S, Sekhari A, Ouzrout Y (2018) Green media-aware medical IoT system. Multimedia Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5634-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. de Albuquerque VHC (2018) Robust automated cardiac arrhythmia detection in ECG beat signals. Neural Comput Appl 29(3):679–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rebouças Filho PP, da Silva Barros AC, Ramalho GLB, Pereira CR, Papa JP, de Albuquerque VHC (2017) Automated recognition of lung diseases in CT images based on the optimum-path forest classifier. Neural Comput Appl 27(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rodrigues JJPC, Segundo DBDR (2018) Enabling technologies for the internet of health things. IEEE Access 6(2018):13129–13141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. da Cruz MAA, Rodrigues JJPC, Al-Muhtadi J (2018) A reference model for internet of things middleware. IEEE Internet of Things J 5(2):871–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lakshmanaprabu SK, Shankar K, Khanna A, Gupta D (2018) Effective features to classify big data using social internet of things. IEEE Access 6(2018):24196–24204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sodhro AH, Pirbhulal S, Sodhro GH (2018) ‘5G-based transmission power control mechanism in fog computing for IoT devices. MDPI Sustain 10(4):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  45. Moraes JL, Rocha MX, Vasconcelos GG, Vasconcelos Filho JE (2018) Advances in photopletysmography signal analysis for biomedical applications. Sensors 18(6):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hussein AF, Kumar A, Burbano-Fernandez M (2018) An automated remote cloud-based heart rate variability monitoring system. IEEE Access 6:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pirbhulal S, Zhang H, Alahi MEE, Ghayvat H, Mukhopadhyay SC, Zhang Y-T et al (2016) A novel secure IoT-based smart home automation system using a wireless sensor network. Sensors 17:69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wanqing Wu, Pirbhulal S (2015) Assessment of biofeedback training for emotion management through wearable textile physiological monitoring system. IEEE Sens J 15(12):7087–7095

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by Natural Science Foundation of China 6171101169, National Key R&D Plan-Key Special Plan on Public Security Risk Mitigation/Response 2017YFC0804003, Technologies and Equipment Guangdong Education Bureau Fund 2017KTSCX166, the Science and Technology Innovation Committee Foundation of Shenzhen JCYJ20170817112037041, Science and Technology Innovation Committee Foundation of Shenzhen (Grant No. ZDSYS201703031748284). Also for this research, Andrei Gurtov was supported by the Center for Industrial Information Technology (CENIIT) Project 17.01. This work is supported in part by the HEC Pakistan under the START-UP RESEARCH GRANT PROGRAM (SRGP)#21-1465/SRGP/R&D/HEC/2016, and Sukkur IBA University, Sukkur, Sindh, Pakistan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Electrical Engineering Department, Sukkur IBA University, Sukkur, 65200, Pakistan

    Ali Hassan Sodhro

  2. IDA-Computer and Information Science Department, Linkoping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden

    Ali Hassan Sodhro

  3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kyunghee University South Korea, Suwon, 16705, Korea

    Abdul Sattar Malokani

  4. Department of Physics, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur Mirs, Sindh, 66111, Pakistan

    Gul Hassan Sodhro

  5. Department of Computer Science, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Muhammad Muzammal

  6. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Computational Intelligence, Department of the Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China

    Luo Zongwei

Authors
  1. Ali Hassan Sodhro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdul Sattar Malokani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gul Hassan Sodhro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Muzammal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luo Zongwei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luo Zongwei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest between all authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09874-w

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sodhro, A.H., Malokani, A.S., Sodhro, G.H. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: An adaptive QoS computation for medical data processing in intelligent healthcare applications. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 723–734 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3931-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3931-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation