Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Development of secured data transmission using machine learning-based discrete-time partially observed Markov model and energy optimization in cognitive radio networks

  • Brain- Inspired computing and Machine learning for Brain Health
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cognitive radio network (CR) is a primary and promising technology to distribute the spectrum assignment to an unlicensed user (secondary users) which is not utilized by the licensed user (primary user).The cognitive radio network frames a reactive security policy to enhance the energy monitoring while using the CR network primary channels. The CR network has a good amount of energy capacity using battery resource and accesses the data communication via the time-slotted channel. The data communication with moderate energy-level utilization during transmission is a great challenge in CR network security monitoring, since intruders may often attack the network in reducing the energy level of the PU or SU. The framework used to secure the communication is using the discrete-time partially observed Markov decision process. This system proposes a modern data communication-secured scheme using private key encryption with the sensing results, and eclat algorithm has been proposed for energy detection and Byzantine attack prediction. The data communication is secured using the AES algorithm at the CR network, and the simulation provides the best effort-efficient energy usage and security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Zhao Q, Krishnamachari B, Liu K (2008) On myopic sensing for multi-channel opportunistic access: structure, optimality, and performance. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 7(12):5431–5440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan M et al (2011) Game-theoretic approach against selfish attacks in cognitive radio networks. In: IEEE/ACIS 10th International conference computer and information science (ICIS)

  3. Cichoń K, Kliks A, Bogucka H (2016) Energy-efficient cooperative spectrum sensing: a survey. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutor 18(3):1861–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang HS, Moayeri N (1995) Finite-state Markov channel: a useful model for radio communication channels. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 44(1):163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alahmadi A, Abdelhakim M, Ren J, Li T (2013) Mitigating primary user emulation attacks in cognitive radio networks using advanced encryption standard. In: Global communications conference (GLOBECOM)

  6. Park S, Hong D (2013) Optimal spectrum access for energy harvesting cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 12(12):6166–6179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elkashlan M, Wang L, Duong TQ, Karagiannidis GK, Nallanathan A (2015) On the security of cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 64(8):3790–3795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel K, Durvesh A (2016) Detection of multiple selfish attack nodes in cognitive radio. IJARIIE-ISSN (O)-2395-4396 2(2)

  9. Vimal S, Kalaivani L, Kaliappan M (2017) Collaborative approach on mitigating spectrum sensing data hijack attack and dynamic spectrum allocation based on CASG modeling in wireless cognitive radio networks. Clust Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1092-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suresh Annamalai, Reyana A, Varatharajan R (2018) CEMulti-core architecture for optimization of energy over heterogeneous environment with high performance smart sensor devices. Wireless Pers Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5504-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holcomb S, Rawat DB (2016) Recent security issues on cognitive radio networks: a survey. In: Proceedings of Southeast Con, pp 1–6

  12. Kim JM, Lee HS, Yi J, Park M (2006) Power adaptive data encryption for energy-efficient and secure communication in solar-powered wireless sensor networks. J Sens vol. 2016, Feb. 2016, Art. no. 2678269. NIST Standards (2001). Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)

  13. Subbulakshmi P et al (2017) Honest auction based radio network. Wirel Pers Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5105-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee P, Eu ZA, Han M, Tan H-P (2011) Empirical modeling of a solar-powered energy harvesting wireless sensor node for time-slotted operation. In: Proceedings of IEEE wireless communications and networking conference, pp 179–184

  15. Abdullah HN, Abed HS (2016) Improvement of energy consumption in cognitive radio by reducing the number of sensed samples. In: Proceedings of Al-Sadeq international conference multidisciplinary IT communication science and applications (AIC-MITCSA), pp 1–6

  16. Chaudhary A, Dongre M, Patil H (2016) Energy-decisive and upgrade cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. Procedia Comput Sci 79:683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang Long, Juebo Wu (2012) Research and analysis on cognitive radio network security. Wirel Sensor Netw 4:120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vullers RJM, van Schaijk R, Doms I, van Hoof C, Mertens R (2009) Micropower energy harvesting. Solid-State Electron 53(7):684–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amiri (2010) Measurements of energy consumption and execution time of different operations on Tmote Sky sensor nodes. Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty Informatiky, Masaryk Univerzita, Brno, Czech Republic

  20. Sen J (2013) A survey on security and privacy protocols for cognitive wireless sensor networks. J Netw Inf Secur 1:1–43

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gill RK, Chawla P, Sachdeva M. Study of LEACH routing protocol for wireless sensor networks

  22. Ilango S et al (2018) Optimization using artificial bee colony based clustering approach for big data. Clust Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1571-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sánchez-Salas DA, Cuevas-Ruíz JL, González-Mendoza M (2012) Wireless channel model with Markov chains using MATLAB. In: MATLAB—a fundamental tool for scientific computing and engineering applications, vol 2. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2012, ch. 11

  24. Wu C, Wang Y, Yin Z (2018) Energy-efficiency opportunistic spectrum allocation in cognitive wireless sensor network. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-017-1018-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cao XR, Guo X (2007) Partially observable Markov decision processes with reward information: basic ideas and models. IEEE Trans Autom Control 52(4):677–681

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu X, He B, Yang W, Zhou X, Cai Y (2016) Secure transmission design for cognitive radio networks with poisson distributed eavesdroppers. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 11(2):373–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vimal S et al (2016) Secure data packet transmission in MANET using enhanced identity-based cryptography. Int J New Technol Sci Eng 3(12):35–42

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fragkiadakis A, Tragos E, Askoxylakis I (2013) A survey on security threats and detection techniques in cognitive radio networks. Commun Surv Tutor IEEE 15(1):428–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen R, Park J-M, Reed JH (2008) Defense against primary user emulation attacks in cognitive radio networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 26(1)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Madbushi S, Raut R, Rukmini MSS (2018) Trust establishment in chaotic cognitive environment to improve attack detection accuracy under primary user emulation. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng 42:291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-018-0073-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bertsekas DP (2007) Dynamic programming and optimal control, vol 1. Athena Scientific, Belmont

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Thylashri S, Femi D, David SA, Suresh A (2018) Vitality and peripatetic sustain cluster key management schemes in MANET. Int J Eng Technol 7(1.7):43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin S, Li Y, Li Y, Ai B, Zhong Z (2014) Finite-state Markov channel modeling for vehicle-to-infrastructure communications. In: Proceedings of IEEE 6th international symposium wireless vehicular communications (WiVeC), pp 1–5

  34. Howa KC, Maa M, Qin Y (2012) An altruistic differentiated service protocol in dynamic cognitive radio networks against selfish behaviors. Comput Netw 56(7):2068–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kannan N, Sivasubramanian S, Kaliappan M, Vimal S, Suresh A (2018) Predictive big data analytic on demonetization data using support vector machine. Clust Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2384-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of IT, National Engineering College, K.R. Nagar, Kovilpatti, Tamilnadu, India

    S. Vimal & M. Kaliappan

  2. Department of EEE, National Engineering College, K.R. Nagar, Kovilpatti, Tamilnadu, India

    L. Kalaivani

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Nehru Institute of Engineering and Technology, T.M. Palayam, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India

    A. Suresh

  4. School of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland

    Xiao-Zhi Gao

  5. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sri Ramanujar Engineering College, Kovilpatti, Tamilnadu, India

    R. Varatharajan

Authors
  1. S. Vimal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Kalaivani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Kaliappan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Suresh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao-Zhi Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Varatharajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Vimal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical responsibilities of the authors

The authors follow the ethical information provided in the journal and hereby abide the same with the journal. I confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere nor it is currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vimal, S., Kalaivani, L., Kaliappan, M. et al. Development of secured data transmission using machine learning-based discrete-time partially observed Markov model and energy optimization in cognitive radio networks. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 151–161 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3788-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3788-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation