Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Hysteretic noisy frequency conversion sinusoidal chaotic neural network for traveling salesman problem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel method to improve accuracy and speed for traveling salesman problem (TSP). A novel hysteretic noisy frequency conversion sinusoidal chaotic neural network (HNFCSCNN) with improved energy function is proposed for TSP to improve the solution quality and reduce the computational complexity. HNFCSCNN combines chaotic searching, stochastic wandering with hysteretic dynamics for better global searching ability. A specific activation function with two hysteretic loops in different directions is adopted to relieve the adverse impact caused by higher noise for frequency conversion sinusoidal chaotic neural network (FCSCNN). A new modified energy function for TSP which has lower computational complexity than the previous energy function is established. The simulation results show that the proposed HNFCSCNN can increase the optimization accuracy and speed of FCSCNN at higher noises, and that the proposed energy function can decrease the runtime of optimal computation. It has better optimization performance than the other several algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Hopfield JJ, Tank DW (1985) Neural computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biol Cybern 52(3):141–152

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Rukhaiyar S, Alam MN, Samadhiya NK (2017) A PSO-ANN hybrid model for predicting factor of safety of slope. Int J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1305652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alam MN. Codes in MATLAB for training artificial neural network using particle swarm optimization [EB/OL]. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mahamad_Alam

  4. Arqub OA, Abo-Hammour Z (2014) Numerical solution of systems of second-order boundary value problems using continuous genetic algorithm. Inf Sci 279:396–415

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Alam MN, Das B, Pant V (2015) A comparative study of metaheuristic optimization approaches for directional overcurrent relays coordination. Electr Power Syst Res 128:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abo-Hammour Z, Arqub OA, Alsmadi O et al (2014) An optimization algorithm for solving systems of singular boundary value problems. Appl Math Inf Sci 8(6):2809–2821

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Abo-hammour Z, Alsmadi O, Momani S et al (2013) A genetic algorithm approach for prediction of linear dynamical systems. Math Probl Eng 2013(4):657–675

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schoonover PL, Crossley WA, Heister SD (2015) Application of a genetic algorithm to the optimization of hybrid rockets. J Spacecr Rockets 37(5):622–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miao M, Wang A, Liu F (2017) Application of artificial bee colony algorithm in feature optimization for motor imagery EEG classification. Neural Comput Appl 7–8:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ali ES, Elazim SMA, Abdelaziz AY (2016) Improved Harmony Algorithm and Power Loss Index for optimal locations and sizing of capacitors in radial distribution systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 80:252–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdelaziz AY, Ali ES, Elazim SMA (2016) Flower Pollination Algorithm and Loss Sensitivity Factors for optimal sizing and placement of capacitors in radial distribution systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 78(2):207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang RL, Tang Z, Cao QP (2002) A learning method in Hopfield neural network for combinatorial optimization problem. Neurocomputing 48(1):1021–1024

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo B, Wang DH, Shen Y et al (2008) A Hopfield neural network approach for power optimization of real-time operating systems. Neural Comput Appl 17(1):11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Uykan Z (2013) Fast-convergent double-sigmoid Hopfield neural network as applied to optimization problems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 24(6):990–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li X, Zhang J, Yin M (2014) Animal migration optimization: an optimization algorithm inspired by animal migration behavior. Neural Comput Appl 24(7–8):1867–1877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen L, Aihara K (1995) Chaotic simulated annealing by a neural network model with transient chaos. Neural Netw 8(6):915–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang L, Smith K (1998) On chaotic simulated annealing. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9(4):716–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li X, Yin M (2014) Self-adaptive constrained artificial bee colony for constrained numerical optimization. Neural Comput Appl 24(3–4):723–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gou J, Guo WP, Wang C et al (2017) A multi-strategy improved particle swarm optimization algorithm and its application to identifying uncorrelated multi-source load in the frequency domain. Neural Comput Appl 28(7):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu Z, Li W, Qiao J (2017) Frequency conversion sinusoidal chaotic neural network and its application. Acta Phys Sin 66(9):090502

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun M, Zhao L, Cao W et al (2010) Novel hysteretic noisy chaotic neural network for broadcast scheduling problems in packet radio networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 21(9):1422–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun M, Xu Y, Dai X et al (2012) Noise-tuning-based hysteretic noisy chaotic neural network for broadcast scheduling problem in wireless multihop networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 23(12):1905–1918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao L, Sun M, Cheng JH et al (2009) A novel chaotic neural network with the ability to characterize local features and its application. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 20(4):735–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bharitkar S, Mendel JM (2000) The hysteretic Hopfield neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 11(4):879–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu W, Wang L (2009) Minimizing interference in satellite communications using transiently chaotic neural networks. Comput Math Appl 57(6):1024–1029

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Mirzaei A, Safabakhsh R (2009) Optimal matching by the transiently chaotic neural network. Appl Soft Comput 9(3):863–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen SS, Shih CW (2009) Transiently chaotic neural networks with piecewise linear output functions. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 39(2):717–730

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang JH, Xu YQ (2009) Wavelet chaotic neural networks and their application to continuous function optimization. Natl Sci 1(3):204–209

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xu X, Tang Z, Wang J (2005) A method to improve the transiently chaotic neural network. Neurocomputing 67:456–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang L, Li S, Tian F et al (2004) A noisy chaotic neural network for solving combinatorial optimization problems: stochastic chaotic simulated annealing. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B (Cybernetics) 34(5):2119–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang L, Shi H (2006) A gradual noisy chaotic neural network for solving the broadcast scheduling problem in packet radio networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 17(4):989–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang L, Liu W, Shi H (2008) Noisy chaotic neural networks with variable thresholds for the frequency assignment problem in satellite communications. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C (Appl Rev) 38(2):209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang L, Liu W, Shi H (2009) Delay-constrained multicast routing using the noisy chaotic neural networks. IEEE Trans Comput 58(1):82–89

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao C, Gan L (2011) Dynamic channel assignment for large-scale cellular networks using noisy chaotic neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22(2):222–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang HB, Wang XX (2011) Resource allocation for downlink OFDM system using noisy chaotic neural network. Electron Lett 47(21):1201–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu X, Xiu C (2007) A novel hysteretic chaotic neural network and its applications. Neurocomputing 70(13):2561–2565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu X, Xiu C (2008) Hysteresis modeling based on the hysteretic chaotic neural network. Neural Comput Appl 17(5–6):579–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen SS (2011) Chaotic simulated annealing by a neural network with a variable delay: design and application. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22(10):1557–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang G, Yi J (2014) Delayed chaotic neural network with annealing controlling for maximum clique problem. Neurocomputing 127(3):114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sun M, Zhao Y, Liu Z et al (2013) Improved hysteretic noisy chaotic neural network for broadcast scheduling problem in WMNs. Telkomnika Indones J Electr Eng 11(3):596–602

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sun M, Lee KY, Xu Y et al (2018) Hysteretic noisy chaotic neural networks for resource allocation in OFDMA system. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 29(2):273–285

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Shuai J, Chen Z, Liu R et al (1996) Self-evolution neural model. Phys Lett A 221(5):311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Potapov A, Ali MK (2000) Robust chaos in neural networks. Phys Lett A 277(6):310–322

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Sih GC, Tang KK (2012) Sustainable reliability of brain rhythms modeled as sinusoidal waves with frequency-amplitude trade-off. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 61:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kwok T, Smith KA (1999) A unified framework for chaotic neural-network approaches to combinatorial optimization. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 10(4):978–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wilson GV, Pawley GS (1988) On the stability of the travelling salesman problem algorithm of Hopfield and Tank. Biol Cybern 58(1):63–70

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Aiyer SB, Niranjan M, Fallside F (1990) A theoretical investigation into the performance of the Hopfield model. Neural Netw IEEE Trans 1(2):204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun S, Zheng J (1995) A modified algorithm and theoretical analysis for Hopfield network solving TSP. Acta Electr Sin 23(1):73–78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61533002), the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61603009), the Beijing Science and Technology Project (Z1511000001315010) and the “Rixin Scientist” Foundation of Beijing University of Technology (2017-RX(1)-04).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiqiang Hu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiao, J., Hu, Z. & Li, W. Hysteretic noisy frequency conversion sinusoidal chaotic neural network for traveling salesman problem. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 7055–7069 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3535-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3535-9

Keywords

Navigation