Important aspects of HV dry type shunt reactors in comparison with oil-immersed shunt reactors

1. Papp K, Sharp MS, Peelo DF (2014) High voltage dry-type air-core shunt reactors. Cigre, Paris, pp A3–A101

   Google Scholar 

2. International Commission on non-ionizing Radiation Protection—ICNIRP: (2010) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz–100 kHz). Health Phys 99(6):818–836

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Smythe WR (1968) Static and dynamic electricity. McGraw-Hill,

   Google Scholar 

4. IEC TS 62073 (2016) Guidance on the measurement of hydrophobicity of insulator surfaces

   Google Scholar 

5. IEEE C39.019 (1963) Safety requirements for standard for low-voltage AC power circuit breakers and Switchgear assemblies. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, USA

   Google Scholar 

6. Basha FK, Thompson M, - Practical EHV reactor protection. IEEE Xplore. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6822055

7. CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL DES GRANDS RÉSEAUX ÉLECTRIQUES. COMITÉ D’ÉTUDES B5 (2012) Protection, monitoring and control of shunt reactors. In: Cigré, Paris

8. IEEE (2007) C37.109 guide for the protection of shunt reactors. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, USA

   Google Scholar 

9. Cigre WG A2.37 (2015) Transformer reliability survey

   Google Scholar 

10. DWIGHT HB (1945) Electrical coils and conductors: their electrical characteristics and theory, 1st edn. University Microfilms International, London, p 351

    Google Scholar 

11. GROVER FW (2009) Inductance calculations: working formulas and tables. Dover Publications, Mineola, NY

    Google Scholar 

12. Dopplmair P, Venediger P, Pointner K (2022) Evaluation and implementation of HV dry-type shunt reactors into a 420 kV transmission grid. Cigre, Paris, pp A2–A810

    Google Scholar 

Download references