Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A model integrating environmental concerns and supply risks for dynamic sustainable supplier selection and order allocation

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental factors are increasingly being considered in supply chain risk management (SCRM), which itself represents a growing trend. Accordingly, dynamic supplier selection and order allocation have become very important. Both qualitative and quantitative factors should be considered in the selection of eligible suppliers. In this study, a novel two-stage comprehensive mathematical model is developed for selecting a set of suppliers and assigning an order quantity to each supplier. The first stage involves a primary selection of alternative suppliers according to the risk value, which is determined using qualitative and quantitative methods based on the best–worst method, and the second stage involves establishing a multiobjective mathematical model for dealing with dynamic supplier selection and order allocation. The proposed approach, which helps enterprises manage uncertainty in SCRM, is applied in this study to the new energy vehicles industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

All data are in this paper.

References

  • Avelar-Sosa L, García-Alcaraz JL, Castrellón-Torres JP (2014) The effects of some risk factors in the supply chains performance: a case of study. J Appl Res Technol 12(5):958–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi A, Kannan G (2016) Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Comput Ind Eng 91:100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi A, Chauhan SS, Goyal SK (2010) A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. Int J Prod Econ 126(2):370–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala HVH, Keller P, de Fátima Morais M, Mariani VC, dos Santos Coelho L, Rao RV (2016) Design of heat exchangers using a novel multiobjective free search differential evolution paradigm. Appl Therm Eng 94:170–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadnia AH, Saman MZM, Wong KY (2015) Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process. Int J Prod Res 53(2):383–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Balan S, Vrat P, Kumar P (2006) Risk analysis in global supply chain network environments. Eur J Oper Res 174(3):1353–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Bora TC, Mariani VC, dos Santos Coelho L (2019) Multi-objective optimization of the environmental-economic dispatch with reinforcement learning based on non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Appl Therm Eng 146:688–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2011) A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Comput Ind 62(2):164–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao L, Xu L, Goodman ED, Li H (2019) Decomposition-based evolutionary dynamic multiobjective optimization using a difference model. Appl Soft Comput 76:473–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan FTS, Kumar N (2007) Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega 35(4):417–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen PS, Wu MT (2013) A modified failure mode and effects analysis method for supplier selection problems in the supply chain risk environment: a case study. Comput Ind Eng 66(4):634–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Mei H, Chou SY, Luu QD, Yu THK (2016) A fuzzy MCDM approach for green supplier selection from the economic and environmental aspects. Math Probl Eng 2016(6):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarini A (2017) Risk-based thinking according to ISO 9001: 2015 standard and the risk sources European manufacturing SMEs intend to manage. TQM J 29(2):310–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CH, Choi TM (2016) Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: a technical review. Ann Oper Res 240(2):489–507

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Choi TY, Krause DR (2006) The supply base and its complexity: implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. J Oper Manag 24(5):637–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotoli M, Fanti MP, Meloni C, Zhou MC (2003) A decision support system for the supply chain configuration. In: IEEE Int conf on SMC, vol 3(5–8), pp 2667–2672

  • Dotoli M, Fanti MP, Meloni C, Zhou MC (2005) A multi-level approach for network design of integrated supply chains. Int J Prod Res 43(20):4267–4287

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dotoli M, Fanti MP, Meloni C, Zhou MC (2006) Design and optimization of integrated e-supply chain for agile and environmentally conscious manufacturing. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 36(1):62–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Er Kara M, Oktay Fırat SÜ (2018) Supplier risk assessment based on best-worst method and K-means clustering: a case study. Sustainability 10(4):1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautam A, Prakash S, Soni U (2018) Supply chain risk management and quality: a case study and analysis of Indian automotive industry. Int J Intell Enterp 5(1–2):194–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Got A, Moussaoui A, Zouache D (2020) A guided population archive whale optimization algorithm for solving multiobjective optimization problems. Expert Syst Appl 141:112972

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Jafarian A (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J Clean Prod 47:345–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Rajendran S, Sarkis J, Murugesan P (2015) Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. J Clean Prod 98:66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Guertler B, Spinler S (2015) Supply risk interrelationships and the derivation of key supply risk indicators. Technol Forecast Soc Change 92:224–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Z, Liu H, Zhang D, Yang J (2017) Green supplier evaluation and selection in apparel manufacturing using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Sustainability 9(4):650

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha SH, Krishnan R (2008) A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 34(2):1303–1311

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi SH, Karimi A, Tavana M (2015) An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved grey relational analysis. Int J Prod Econ 159:178–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CW, Hu AH (2009) Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. J Clean Prod 17(2):255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan D, Khodaverdi R, Olfat L, Jafarian A, Diabat A (2013) Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. J Clean Prod 47:355–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawtummachai R, Van Hop N (2005) Order allocation in a multiple-supplier environment. Int J Prod Econ 93:231–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Kırılmaz O, Erol S (2017) A proactive approach to supply chain risk management: shifting orders among suppliers to mitigate the supply side risks. J Purch Supply Manag 23(1):54–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull TJ, Talluri S (2008) A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 55(3):409–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo RJ, Wang YC, Tien FC (2010) Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J Clean Prod 18(12):1161–1170

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacerda AS, Batista LS (2019) KDT-MOEA: a multiobjective optimization framework based on KD trees. Inf Sci 503:200–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee AHI (2009) A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs andrisks. Expert Syst Appl 36:2879–2893

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Hou PW, Chen P, Li QH (2016) Pricing strategy and coordination in a dual channel supply chain with a risk-averse retailer. Int J Prod Econ 178:154–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Xu W, Yue C, Yu K, Song H, Crisalle OD, Qu B (2019) Multimodal multiobjective optimization with differential evolution. Swarm Evol Comput 44:1028–1059

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu A, Fowler J, Pfund M (2016a) Dynamic co-ordinated scheduling in the supply chain considering flexible routes. Int J Prod Res 54(1):322–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Jiao L, Ma W, Ma J, Shang R (2016b) A new quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization based on cultural evolution mechanism for multiobjective problems. Knowl Based Syst 101:90–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu A, Liu H, Xiao Y, Tsai SB, Lu H (2018a) An empirical study on design partner selection in green product collaboration design. Sustainability 10(1):133

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu A, Zhu Q, Ji X, Lu H, Tsai SB (2018b) Novel method for perceiving key requirements of customer collaboration low-carbon product design. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(7):1446

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu LY, Wu CH, Kuo TC (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Prod Res 45(18–19):4317–4331

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Luthra S, Govindan K, Kannan D et al (2017) An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J Clean Prod 140:1686–1698

    Google Scholar 

  • Manchanda R, Legood R, Pearce L, Menon U (2015) Defining the risk threshold for risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in low risk postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol 139(3):487–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S, Saremi S, Mirjalili SM, Coelho LDS (2016) Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: a novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization. Expert Syst Appl 47:106–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtza SA, Ahmad A, Shafique J (2020) Integer cat swarm optimization algorithm for multiobjective integer problems. Soft Comput 24:1927–1955

    Google Scholar 

  • Nartu TR, Matta MS, Koratana S (2019) A fuzzified Pareto multiobjective cuckoo search algorithm for power losses minimization incorporating SVC. Soft Comput 23:10811–10820

    Google Scholar 

  • Nekooie MA, Sheikhalishahi M, Hosnavi R (2015) Supplier selection considering strategic and operational risks: a combined qualitative and quantitative approach. Prod Eng 9(5–6):665–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto JXV, Junior EJG, Moreno SR, Ayala HVH, Mariani VC, dos Santos Coelho L (2018) Wind turbine blade geometry design based on multi-objective optimization using metaheuristics. Energy 162:645–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan W, Wang F, Guo Y et al (2015) A fuzzy multiobjective model for supplier selection under considering stochastic demand in a supply chain. Math Probl Eng 1:1–8

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh R, Ravi V (2015) Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: a grey relational analysis approach. J Clean Prod 86:343–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Redsell SA, Weng S, Swift JA, Nathan D, Glazebrook C (2016) Validation, optimal threshold determination, and clinical utility of the infant risk of overweight checklist for early prevention of child overweight. Child Obes 12(3):202–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J (2016) Best-worst multi-criteria decision making method: some properties and a linear model. Omega 64:126–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio-Largo A, Zhang Q, Vega-Rodríguez MA (2015) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition for 3-objective optimization problems with objectives in different scales. Soft Comput 19(1):157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai WH, Hung SJ (2009) A fuzzy goal programming approach for green supply chain optimisation under activity-based costing and performance evaluation with a value-chain structure. Int J Prod Res 47(18):4991–5017

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Turner I (1988) An independent system for the evaluation of contract tenders. J Oper Res Soc 39(6):551–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SM, Neshat N (2012) A comparison of supply chain vulnerability indices for different categories of firms. Int J Prod Res 50(11):2877–2891

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon J, Talluri S, Yildiz H, Ho W (2018) Models for supplier selection and risk mitigation: a holistic approach. Int J Prod Res 56(10):3636–3661

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z (2019) Fast multiobjective immune optimization approach solving multiobjective interval number programming. Swarm Evol Comput 51:100578

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Sun J, Liu T, Zhang K, Zhang Q (2019) Balancing exploration and exploitation in multiobjective evolutionary optimization. Inf Sci 497:129–148

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by Key Realm R&D Program of GuangDong Province under Grants (2019B020214002), Beijing Social Science Foundation (18GLB022, 18GLA009, 17GLC066, 19GLC051, 19ZDA12), Beijing Intelligent Logistics System Collaborative Innovation Center, Social science program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (SM201810037001, SM201910037004), Beijing Wuzi University Major Research Projects (2019XJZD12).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, 101149, China

    Feng Li & Li Zhou

  2. Institute of Service Industries and Management, Minghsin University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu, 304, Taiwan

    Chia-Huei Wu

  3. School of Logistics, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, 101149, China

    Guangshu Xu

  4. Business School, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, 101149, China

    Yongsheng Liu

  5. School of Business, Wuyi University, Wuyishan, 354300, China

    Sang-Bing Tsai

  6. Research Center for Environment and Sustainable Development of China Civil Aviation, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin, 300300, China

    Sang-Bing Tsai

Authors
  1. Feng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chia-Huei Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guangshu Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yongsheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sang-Bing Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yongsheng Liu or Sang-Bing Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, F., Wu, CH., Zhou, L. et al. A model integrating environmental concerns and supply risks for dynamic sustainable supplier selection and order allocation. Soft Comput 25, 535–549 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05165-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05165-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation