Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of optimum stent deployment by stent boost imaging: comparison with intravascular ultrasound

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Stent boost (SB) imaging is an enhancement of the radiologic edge of the stent by digital management of regular X-ray images. The purpose of the present study was to validate SB imaging by comparison with the anatomical standard using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated SB and IVUS after stent implantation in 68 arteries in 60 patients. Based on those findings, we added high-pressure dilatation in four patients and another stent implantation in four patients. We defined the SB criteria for adequate stent deployment as: complete stent expansion, stent minimum diameter ≥70% of reference diameter, and stent minimum diameter ≥2.0 mm; and IVUS criteria for adequate stent deployment as: minimal stent area ≥5.0 mm2. If the reference vessel was <2.8 mm, adequate stent deployment was defined as minimum stent area ≥4.5 mm2. IVUS findings indicated inadequate stent deployment in 21/72 observations (29%). Seven SB images showed inadequate stent expansion. SB predicted inadequate findings of IVUS with 100% specificity, 33% sensitivity, and 81% agreement. Although the sensitivity of SB image for adequate stent deployment is low, the specificity is sufficiently high for it to be the first-line for monitoring just after stent implantation in centers where IVUS is not used routinely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Nordmann AJ, Briel M, Bucher HC (2006) Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta analysis. Eur Heart J 27:2784–2814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mauri L, Hsieh W, Massaro JM, Ho KKL, D’Agostino R, Cutlip DE (2007) Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 356:1020–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sonoda S, Morino Y, Ako J, Terashima M, Hassan AHM, Bonneau HN, Leon MB, Moses JW, Yock PG, Honda Y, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ (2004) Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the SIRIUS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1959–1963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, Yang Y, Moussa I, Weisz G, Dangas G, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Kreps EM, Collins M, Stone GW, Moses JW, Leon MB (2005) Stent under expansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:995–998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook S, Wenaweser P, Togni M, Billinger M, Morger C, Seiler C, Vogel R, Hess O, Meier B, Windecker S (2007) Incomplete stent apposition and very late stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. Circulation 115:2426–2434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Muraoka Y, Sonoda S, Tsuda Y, Tanaka S, Okazaki M, Otsuji Y (2010) Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided adjuvant high-pressure non-compliant balloon post-dilation after drug-eluting stent implantation. Heart Vessels. doi: 10.1007/s00380-010-0094-0

  7. Orford JL, Lerman A, Holmes DR (2004) Routine intravascular ultrasound guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention. A critical reappraisal. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1335–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koolen JJ, van het Veer M, Hanekamp CE (2005) StentBoost image enhancement: first clinical experience. Medicamundi 49:4–8

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mishell JM, Vakharia KT, Ports TA, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD (2007) Determination of adequate coronary stent expansion using StentBoost, a novel fluoroscopic image processing technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:84–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ariyoshi M, Shiraishi J, Kimura M, Matsui A, Takeda M, Arihara M, Hyogo M, Shima T, Okada T, Kohno Y, Sawada T, Matsubara H (2011) Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction due to possible sequelae of Kawasaki disease in young adults: a case series. Heart Vessels 26:117–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maekawa Y, Asakura Y, Anzai T, Ishikawa S, Okabe T, Yoshikawa T, Ogawa S (2005) Relation of stent overexpansion to the angiographic no-reflow phenomenon in intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Heart Vessels 20:13–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuhiro Tanaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanaka, N., Pijls, N.H.J., Koolen, J.J. et al. Assessment of optimum stent deployment by stent boost imaging: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Heart Vessels 28, 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-011-0202-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-011-0202-9

Keywords

Navigation