Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An efficient fixed-time increment-based data-driven simulation for general multibody dynamics using deep neural networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we propose an efficient fixed-time increment-based numerical scheme for data-driven analysis of general multibody dynamics (MBD) problems combining deep neural network (DNN) modeling and principal component analysis (PCA), avoiding local fluctuation of the time transient response that occurred in other works. Output results of the transient dynamics simulation can be expressed as general displacement, velocity, and acceleration, which can also be represented in a reduced dimension by the PCA. This data set is expressed in a fixed-time increment based format, leading to a large data set that is advantageous for training to construct an efficient DNN meta-model. In addition, the number of samples is also significantly reduced. As a result, the training cost is dramatically reduced compared to the simulation without PCA despite a smaller number of samples being used. To demonstrate the performance of the proposed scheme, we solve three benchmark problems: a double pendulum, damped spherical elastic pendulum, and vibrating transmission. From the results, it was found that, when the proposed scheme is used, the training time can be drastically reduced while maintaining high accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also form part of an ongoing study.

References

  1. Wehage RA, Haug EJ (1982) Generalized coordinate partitioning for dimension reduction in analysis of constrained dynamic systems. J Mech Des 104:247–255

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shabana AA (2003) Dynamics of multibody systems. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wehage KT, Wehage RA, Ravani B (2015) Generalized coordinate partitioning for complex mechanisms based on kinematic substructuring. Mech Mach Theory 92:464–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brüls O, Duysinx P, Golinval J-C (2006) A model reduction method for the control of rigid mechanisms. Multibody SysDyn 15:213–227

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Brüls O, Duysinx P, Golinval JC (2007) The global modal parameterization for non-linear model-order reduction in flexible multibody dynamics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 69:948–977

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Naets F, Tamarozzi T, Heirman GH, Desmet W (2012) Real-time flexible multibody simulation with global modal parameterization. Multibody SysDyn 27:267–284

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Masoudi R, Uchida T, McPhee J (2015) Reduction of multibody dynamic models in automotive systems using the proper orthogonal decomposition. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 10:031007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuadrado J, Dopico D, Naya MA, Gonzalez M (2004) Penalty, semi-recursive and hybrid methods for MBS real-time dynamics in the context of structural integrators. Multibody SysDyn 12:117–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pan Y, Dai W, Xiong Y, Xiang S, Mikkola A (2020) Tree-topology-oriented modeling for the real-time simulation of sedan vehicle dynamics using independent coordinates and the rod-removal technique. Mech Mach Theory 143:103626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan Y, Dai W, Huang L, Li Z, Mikkola A (2021) Iterative refinement algorithm for efficient velocities and accelerations solutions in closed-loop multibody dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 152:107463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayo E, de Jalon JG, Avello A, Cuadrado J (1991) An efficient computational method for real time multibody dynamic simulation in fully Cartesian coordinates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 92:377–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cossalter V, Lot R (2002) A motorcycle multi-body model for real time simulations based on the natural coordinates approach. Veh Syst Dyn 37:423–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Valasek M, Sika Z, Vaculin O (2007) Multibody formalism for real-time application using natural coordinates and modified state space. Multibody SysDyn 17:209–227

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pappalardo CM (2015) A natural absolute coordinate formulation for the kinematic and dynamic analysis of rigid multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn 81:1841–1869

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ros J, Plaza A, Iriarte X, Pintor JM (2018) Symbolic multibody methods for real-time simulation of railway vehicles. Multibody SysDyn 42:469–493

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Ting J-A, Mistry MN, Peters J, Schaal S, Nakanishi J (2006) A Bayesian approach to nonlinear parameter identification for rigid body dynamics. In: Robotics: science and systems II, vol 2016. MIT Press, pp 32–39

  17. Blanco-Claraco J, Torres-Moreno J, Giménez-Fernández A (2015) Multibody dynamic systems as Bayesian networks: applications to robust state estimation of mechanisms. Multibody SysDyn 34:103–128

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Ye Y, Shi D, Krause P, Hecht M (2019) A data-driven method for estimating wheel flat length. Vehicle Syst Dyn 58:1329–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye Y-G, Shi D-C, Poveda-Reyes S, Hecht M (2020) Quantification of the influence of rolling stock failures on track deterioration. J Zhejiang Univ-SCIENCE A 21:783–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kraft S, Causse J, Martinez A (2019) Black-box modelling of nonlinear railway vehicle dynamics for track geometry assessment using neural networks. Veh Syst Dyn 57:1241–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martin TP, Zaazaa KE, Whitten B, Tajaddini A (2007), Using a multibody dynamic simulation code with neural network technology to predict railroad vehicle-track interaction performance in real time. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2007, pp 1881–1891

  22. Ansari H, Tupy M, Datar M, Negrut D (2010) Construction and use of surrogate models for the dynamic analysis of multibody systems. SAE Int J Passeng Cars-Mech Syst 3:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Angeli A, Naets F, Desmet W (2019) A machine learning approach for minimal coordinate multibody simulation. In: European Congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering, Springer, 2019, pp 417–424

  24. Angeli A, Desmet W, Naets F (2021) Deep learning for model order reduction of multibody systems to minimal coordinates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 373:113517

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Byravan A, Fox D (2017) Se3-nets: learning rigid body motion using deep neural networks. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 173–180

  26. Choi H-S, An J, Han S, Kim J-G, Jung J-Y, Choi J, Orzechowski G, Mikkola A, Choi JH (2021) Data-driven simulation for general-purpose multibody dynamics using Deep Neural Networks. Multibody SysDyn 51:419–454

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Han S, Choi HS, Choi J, Choi JH, Kim JG (2021) A DNN-based data-driven modeling employing coarse sample data for real-time flexible multibody dynamics simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 373:113480

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Ye YU, Huang P, Sun Y, Shi DC (2021) MBSNet: A deep learning model for multibody dynamics simulation and its application to a vehicle-track system. Mech Syst Signal Process 157:107716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kurvinen E, Suninen I, Orzechowski G, Choi JH, Kim JG, Mikkola A (2021) Accelerating design processes using data-driven models. In: Real-time simulation for sustainable production. Routledge, pp 65–76

  30. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P (1987) Principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bayo E, Ledesma R (1996) Augmented Lagrangian and mass-orthogonal projection methods for constrained multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn 9:113–130

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div 85:67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, Killeen T, Lin ZM, Gimelshein N, Antiga L, Desmaison A, Kopf A, Yang E, DeVito Z, Raison M, Tejani A, Chilamkurthy S, Steiner B, Fang L, Bai JJ, Chintala S (2019) PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Adv Neural Inf 32:8026–8037

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bergstra J, Bengio Y (2012) Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. J Mach Learn Res 13:281–305

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. He X, Zhao K, Chu X (2021) AutoML: a survey of the state-of-the-art. Knowl-Based Syst 212:106622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In: International conference on machine learning, vol 37. PMLR, pp 448–456

  38. MATLAB (2022) Version R2022a. The MathWorks Inc, Natick, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  39. RecurDyn, V9R4, Function Bay Inc.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported with the support of the Space Challenge Project (NRF-2020M1A3B8084736) of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the government (Ministry of Science and ICT) in 2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-Daero, Deokjin-Gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, 54896, Republic of Korea

    Myeong-Seok Go & Jae Hyuk Lim

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering (Integrated Engineering), Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-Gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17104, Republic of Korea

    Seongji Han & Jin-Gyun Kim

Authors
  1. Myeong-Seok Go
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seongji Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jae Hyuk Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jin-Gyun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jae Hyuk Lim or Jin-Gyun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Go, MS., Han, S., Lim, J.H. et al. An efficient fixed-time increment-based data-driven simulation for general multibody dynamics using deep neural networks. Engineering with Computers 40, 323–341 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01793-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01793-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation