Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A modified brain emotional learning model for earthquake magnitude and fear prediction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brain emotional learning (BEL) model has been used frequently for predicting a quantity or modeling complex and nonlinear systems in recent years. In this research, two methods proposed for improving the efficiency of original BEL model using fuzzy rules, learning automata concepts and optimization algorithms. In the first proposed method, different optimization algorithms and continuous action-set learning automata (CALA) were used for finding the weights of BEL model, while in the second proposed model, the weights obtained using original rules of BEL model. In fact, in the second model finite action-set learning automata, CALA and different optimization algorithms were used for calibrating the learning parameters of the model. Also in the both proposed methods after extracting frequency features in thalamus, deep belief network is used in the sensory cortex for reducing the size of features. In addition, ANFIS is used for making fuzzy rules in the amygdala. The proposed models were used for magnitude and consequently fear prediction of the earthquakes. The results show that although both proposed methods are more accurate than original BEL model and could be used successfully, the second proposed model is more precise and reliable than the first proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moren J (2002) Emotion and Learning—a computational model of the amygdala, PhD dissertation. Cognitive studies, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

  2. Moren J, Balkenius C (2000) A computational model of emotional learning in the amygdala. Cybern Syst 32(6):611–636

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Parsapoor M, Bilstrup U (2013) Chaotic time series prediction using brain emotional learning based recurrent fuzzy system (BELRFS). Int J Reasoning-based Intell Syst 5(2):113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lotfi E, Setayeshi S, Taimory S (2014) A neural basis computational model of emotional brain for online visual object recognition. Appl Artif Intell 28(8):814–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2014.952924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maleki M, Nourafza N, Setayeshi S (2016) A novel approach for designing a cognitive sugarscape cellular society using an extended moren network. Intell Autom Soft Comput 22(2):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10798587.2015.1090720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Asadi Ghanbari A, Heidari E, Setayeshi S (2012) Brain emotional learning based brain computer interface. Int J Comput Sci Issues 9(5):146–154

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lotfi E, Akbarzadeh-T MR (2014) Adaptive brain emotional decayed learning for online prediction of geomagnetic activity indices. Neuro Comput 126:188–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2013.02.040

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lotfi E (2013) Mathematical modeling of emotional brain for classification problems. Proceedings of IAM 2(1):60–71

  9. Lucas C (2010) Introducing BELBIC: Brain emotional learning based intelligent controller. Integrated Syst Design Technol 3:203–214

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fakhrmoosavy SH, Setayeshi S, Sharifi A (2017) An intelligent method for generating artificial earthquake records based on hybrid PSO-parallel brain emotional learning inspired model. Eng Comput (In Press)

  11. Lotfi E, Akbarzadeh -T, M. R (2013) Brain emotional learning-based pattern recognizer. Cybernet Syst 44(5):402–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2013.789652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parsapoor M, Bilstrup U (2012) Brain emotional learning based fuzzy inference system (BELFIS) for solar activity forecasting. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, vol 01

  13. Lotfi E (2013) Brain-inspired emotional learning for image classification. Majlesi J Multimed Process 2(3):21–26

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pasrapoor M, Bilstrup U (2013, 10–12 Sept. 2013) Brain emotional learning based fuzzy inference system (modified using radial basis function). Paper presented at the Eighth international conference on digital information management (ICDIM 2013)

  15. Lotfi E, Keshavarz A (2014) A simple mathematical fuzzy model of brain emotional learning to predict kp geomagnetic index. Int J Intell Syst Appl Eng 2(2):22–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lucas C, Moghimi S (2004) Applying BELBIC (brain emotional learning based intelligent controller) to an autolanding system. WSEAS Transactions on Systems 3(1):284–290

    Google Scholar 

  17. Narendra KS, Thathachar MAL. (1974) Learning automata—a survey. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet SMC -4:323–334

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Narendra KS, Thathachar MAL (1989) Learning automata: an introduction: Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Thathachar MAL, Sastry PS (2002) Varieties of learning automata: an overview. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 32(6):711–722. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2002.1049606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lotfi E, Khosravi A, Akbarzadeh-T MR, Nahavandi S (2014) Wind power forecasting using emotional neural networks. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernet (SMC)

  21. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ojaghzadeh Mohammadi SD, Bahar A, Fakhrmoosavi SH, Setayeshi S (2010) Optimal column base plate design using a modified genetic algorithm based on Newton-Raphson method. In: 3rd International conference on advanced computer theory and engineering. Chengdu, China

  23. Kennedy J, RC E (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Paper presented at the Proc. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (Perth, Australia), Piscataway

  24. Kennedy J (2010) Particle Swarm Optimization. In: Sammut C, Webb GI (eds) Encyclopedia of machine learning. Springer, Boston, pp 760–766

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar N, Vidyarthi DP (2016) A novel hybrid PSO–GA meta-heuristic for scheduling of DAG with communication on multiprocessor systems. Eng Comput 32(1):35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0396-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hasanipanah M, Noorian-Bidgoli M, Jahed Armaghani D, Khamesi H (2016) Feasibility of PSO-ANN model for predicting surface settlement caused by tunneling. Eng Comput 32(4):705–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-016-0447-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hasanipanah M, Armaghani Jahed, Amnieh D., Bakhshandeh, Majid H, M. Z. A., & Tahir M. M. D. (2016) Application of PSO to develop a powerful equation for prediction of flyrock due to blasting. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2434-1

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hasanipanah M, Naderi R, Kashir J, Noorani SA, Qaleh A. Z. A. (2017) Prediction of blast-produced ground vibration using particle swarm optimization. Eng Comput 33(2):173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hasanipanah M, Amnieh HB, Arab H, Zamzam MS (2016) Feasibility of PSO-ANFIS model to estimate rock fragmentation produced by mine blasting. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2746-1

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ghasemi E, Kalhori H, Bagherpour R (2016) A new hybrid ANFIS–PSO model for prediction of peak particle velocity due to bench blasting. Eng Comput 32(4):607–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-016-0438-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang J, Xia P (2017) An improved PSO algorithm for parameter identification of nonlinear dynamic hysteretic models. J Sound Vib 389:153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gholizad A, Ojaghzadeh Mohammadi SD (2017) Reliability-based design of tuned mass damper using Monte Carlo simulation under artificial earthquake records. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 17(10):1750121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical report-tr06, Erciyes university, engineering faculty, computer engineering department

  34. Newland DE (1993) An introduction to random vibrations, spectral and wavelet analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

  35. Jang J. S. R. (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 23(3):665–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu Y, Zhou S, Chen Q (2011) Discriminative deep belief networks for visual data classification. Pattern Recognit 44(10):2287–2296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2010.12.012

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee H, Ekanadham C, Ng AY (2007) Sparse deep belief net model for visual area V2. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Curran Associates Inc., 873–880

  38. Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786):504–507

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/mag_vs_int.php

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Seyyedeh Hoora Fakhrmoosavy & Arash Sharifi

  2. Department of Medical Radiation Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Saeed Setayeshi

Authors
  1. Seyyedeh Hoora Fakhrmoosavy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saeed Setayeshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arash Sharifi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Setayeshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fakhrmoosavy, S.H., Setayeshi, S. & Sharifi, A. A modified brain emotional learning model for earthquake magnitude and fear prediction. Engineering with Computers 34, 261–276 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0538-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0538-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation