Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation and prediction of flyrock resulting from blasting operations using empirical and computational methods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mines, quarries and construction sites face environmental impacts, such as flyrock, due to blasting operations. Flyrock may cause damage to structures and injury to human. Therefore, flyrock prediction is required to determine safe blasting zone. In this regard, 232 blasting operations were investigated in five granite quarries, Malaysia. Blasting parameters comprising maximum charge per delay and powder factor were prepared to predict flyrock using empirical and intelligent methods. An empirical graph was proposed to predict flyrock distance for different powder factor values. In addition, using the same datasets, two intelligent systems, namely artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) were used to predict flyrock. Considering some model performance indices including coefficient of determination (R 2), value account for and root mean squared error and also using simple ranking procedure, the best flyrock prediction models were selected. It was found that the ANFIS model can predict flyrock with higher performance capacity compared to ANN predictive model. R 2 values of testing datasets are 0.925 and 0.964 for ANN and ANFIS techniques, respectively, suggesting the superiority of the ANFIS technique in predicting flyrock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khandelwal K, Monjezi M (2013) Prediction of flyrock in open pit blasting operation using machine learning method. Int J Min Sci Technol 23(3):313–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh TN, Singh V (2005) An intelligent approach to prediction and control ground vibration in mines. Geotech Geolog Eng 23:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rezaei M, Monjezi M, Yazdian Varjani A (2011) Development of a fuzzy model to predict flyrock in surface mining. Safety Sci 49(2):298–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Sohaei H, Tonnizam Mohamad E, Marto A (2014) Prediction of airblast-overpressure induced by blasting using a hybrid artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization. Appl Acoust 80:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy PP (2005) Rock blasting effects and operations. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raina AK, Murthy VMSR, Soni AK (2014) Flyrock in bench blasting: a comprehensive review. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s10064-014-0588-6

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhandari S (1997) Engineering rock blasting operations. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bajpayee TS, Rehak TR, Mowrey GL, Ingram DK (2004) Blasting injuries in surface mining with emphasis on flyrock and blast area security. J Safety Res 35(1):47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hemphill GB (1981) Blasting operations. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koop JW (1994) Observation of flyrock of several mines and quarries. In: Proceeding of 20th Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique Austin Texas, 30 January–3 February. Cleveland International Society of Explosives Engineers, pp 75–81

  11. Kecojevic V, Radomsky M (2005) Flyrock phenomena and area security in blasting-related accidents. Safety Sci 43:739–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Workman JL, Calder PN (1994) Flyrock prediction and control in surface mine blasting. In: Proceeding of 20th Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique. Austin, Texas, 30 January–3 February. International Society of Explosives Engineers, Cleveland, pp 59–74

  13. Lundborg N, Persson N, Ladegaard-Pedersen A, Holmberg R (1975) Keeping the lid on flyrock in open pit blasting. Eng Min J 176:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roth JA (1979) A model for the determination of flyrock range as a function of shot condition. US department of commerce. NTIS report no. PB81222358

  15. Chiapetta RF, Bauer A, Dailey PJ, Burchell SL (1983) The use of high-speed motion picture photography in blast evaluation and design. Proceedings of 9th conference on explosives and blasting techniques. Dallas, USA, pp 31–40

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta RN (1980) Surface blasting and its impact on environment. In: Trivedy NJ, Singh BP (eds) Impact of mining on environment. Ashish Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 23–24

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roy PP (1993) Putting ground vibration predictors into practice. Colliery Guardian 241:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  18. Monjezi M, Bahrami A, Yazdian Varjani A (2010) Simultaneous prediction of fragmentation and flyrock in blasting operation using artificial neural networks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(3):476–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jahed Armaghani D, Hajihassani M, Tonnizam Mohamad E, Marto A, Noorani SA (2014) Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artificial neural network based on particle swarm optimization. Arab J Geosci 7:5383–5396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bahrami A, Monjezi M, Goshtasbi K, Ghazvinian A (2011) Prediction of rock fragmentation due to blasting using artificial neural network. Eng Comput 27(2):177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khandelwal M, Kumar DL, Yellishetty M (2011) Application of soft computing to predict blast-induced ground vibration. Eng Comput 27(2):117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Iphar M, Yavuz M, Ak H (2008) Prediction of ground vibrations resulting from the blasting operations in an open-pit mine by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Environ Geol 56:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh TN, Verma AK (2012) Comparative analysis of intelligent algorithms to correlate strength and petrographic properties of some schistose rocks. Eng Comput 28(1):1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Marto A, Tonnizam Mohamad E (2014) Ground vibration prediction in quarry blasting through an artificial neural network optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s10064-014-0657-x

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gordan B, Jahed Armaghani D, Hajihassani M, Monjezi M (2015) Prediction of seismic slope stability through combination of particle swarm optimization and neural network. Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s00366-015-0400-7

    Google Scholar 

  26. Garret JH (1994) Where and why artificial neural networks are applicable in civil engineering. J Comput Civil Eng 8:129–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stojadinovic S, Pantovic R, Zikic M (2011) Prediction of flyrock trajectories for forensic applications using ballistic flight equations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:1086–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mandal SK (1997) Causes of flyrock damages and its remedial measures. Course on: recent advances in blasting techniques in mining and construction projects, HRD-CMRI Dhanbad, pp 130–136

  29. Adhikari GR (1999) Studies on flyrock at limestone quarries. Rock Mech Rock Eng 32(4):291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fletcher LR, D’Andrea DV (1987) Reducing accident through improved blasting safety. USBM IC, 9135. In: Proceedings of bureau of mines technology transfer sem, Chicago, pp 6–18

  31. Raina AK, Chakraborty AK, More R, Choudhury PB (2006) Design of factor of safety based criterion for control of flyrock/throw and optimum fragmentation. J Inst Eng India 87:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  32. McKenzie CK (2009) Flyrock range and fragment size prediction. http://docs.isee.org/ISEE/Support/Proceed/General/09GENV2/09v206g.pdf

  33. Trivedi R, Singh TN, Raina AK (2014) Prediction of blast-induced flyrock in Indian limestone mines using neural networks. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(5):447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ghasemi E, Sari M, Ataei M (2012) Development of an empirical model for predicting the effects of controllable blasting parameters on flyrock distance in surface mines. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 52:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ghasemi E, Amini H, Ataei M, Khalokakaei R (2014) Application of artificial intelligence techniques for predicting the flyrock distance caused by blasting operation. Arab J Geosci 7(1):193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Monjezi M, Khoshalan HA, Varjani AY (2012) Prediction of flyrock and backbreak in open pit blasting operation: a neuro-genetic approach. Arab J Geosci 5(3):441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Monjezi M, Bahrami A, Varjani AY, Sayadi AR (2011) Prediction and controlling of flyrock in blasting operation using artificial neural network. Arab J Geosci 4:421–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Amini H, Gholami R, Monjezi M, Torabi SR, Zadhesh J (2012) Evaluation of flyrock phenomenon due to blasting operation by support vector machine. Neural Comput Appl 21(8):2077–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Monjezi M, Mehrdanesh A, Malek A, Khandelwal M (2013) Evaluation of effect of blast design parameters on flyrock using artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 23(2):349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Marto A, Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Tonnizam Mohamad E, Makhtar AM (2014) A novel approach for blast-induced flyrock prediction based on imperialist competitive algorithm and artificial neural network. Sci World J (Article ID 643715)

  41. Simpson PK (1990) Artificial neural system: foundation, paradigms, applications and implementations. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shahin MA, Maier HR, Jaksa MB (2002) Predicting settlement of shallow foundations using neural networks. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(9):785–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Haykin S (1999) Neural Networks, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Du KL, Lai AKY, Cheng KKM, Swamy MNS (2002) Neural methods for antenna array signal processing: a review. Signal Process 82:547–561

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Kalinli A, Acar MC, Gunduz Z (2011) New approaches to determine the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations based on artificial neural networks and ant colony optimization. Eng Geol 117:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Engelbrecht AP (2007) Computational intelligence: an introduction. Wiley, New York

  47. Dreyfus G (2005) Neural Networks: methodology and application. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kosko B (1994) Neural networks and fuzzy systems: a dynamical systems approach to machine intelligence. Prentice Hall, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fausett LV (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks: architecture, algorithms and applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jang RJS (1993) Anfis: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Jang RJS, Sun CT, Mizutani E (1997) Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 614

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jahed Armaghani D, Tonnizam Mohamad E, Momeni E, Narayanasamy MS, Mohd Amin MF (2014) An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for predicting unconfined compressive strength and Young’s modulus: a study on main range granite. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s10064-014-0687-4

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ataei M, Kamali M (2012) Prediction of blast-induced vibration by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in Karoun 3 power plant and dam. J Vib Control 22:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  54. Singh R, Kainthola A, Singh TN (2012) Estimation of elastic constant of rocks using an ANFIS approach. Appl Soft Comput 12(1):40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. ISRM (2007) In: Ulusay and Hudson (eds) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods. International Society for Rock Mechanics

  56. Hush DR (1989) Classification with neural networks: a performance analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems Engineering. Dayton, USA, pp 277–280

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kanellopoulas I, Wilkinson GG (1997) Strategies and best practice for neural network image classification. Int J Remote Sensing 18:711–725

  58. Hecht-Nielsen R (1987) Kolmogorov’s mapping neural network existence theorem. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 1–14

  59. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Baheer I (2000) Selection of methodology for modeling hysteresis behavior of soils using neural networks. J Comput Aid Civil Infrastruct Eng 5(6):445–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Kayabasi A (2006) Estimation of rock modulus: for intact rocks with an artificial neural network and for rock masses with a new empirical equation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:224–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C (2008) Discussion on the paper by H. Gullu and E. Ercelebi A neural network approach for attenuation relationships: an application using strong ground motion data from Turkey. Eng Geol 97:91–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ripley BD (1993) Statistical aspects of neural networks. In: Barndoff-Neilsen OE, Jensen JL, Kendall WS (eds) Networks and chaos-statistical and probabilistic aspects. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 40-123

  64. Paola JD (1994) Neural network classification of multispectral imagery. MSc thesis, The University of Arizona, USA

  65. Wang C (1994) A theory of generalization in learning machines with neural application. PhD thesis, The University of Pennsylvania, USA

  66. Masters T (1994) Practical neural network recipes in C ++. Academic Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kaastra I, Boyd M (1996) Designing a neural network for forecasting financial and economic time series. Neurocomputing 10:215–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Swingler K (1996) Applying neural networks: a practical guide. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  69. Looney CG (1996) Advances in feed-forward neural networks: demystifying knowledge acquiring black boxes. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 8(2):211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Nelson M, Illingworth WT (1990) A practical guide to neural nets. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  71. Yagiz S, Gokceoglu C, Sezer E, Iplikci S (2009) Application of two non-linear prediction tools to the estimation of tunnel boring machine performance. Eng Appl Artif Intel 22(4):808–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Demuth H, Beale M, Hagan M (2009) MATLAB Version 7.14.0.739; Neural Network Toolbox for Use with Matlab. The Mathworks

  73. Zorlu K, Gokceoglu C, Ocakoglu F, Nefeslioglu HA, Acikalin S (2008) Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of sandstones using petrography-based models. Eng Geol 96(3):141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their appreciation to the Government of Malaysia and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for the FRGS Grant No. 4F406 and for providing the required facilities that made this research possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Jahed Armaghani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahed Armaghani, D., Tonnizam Mohamad, E., Hajihassani, M. et al. Evaluation and prediction of flyrock resulting from blasting operations using empirical and computational methods. Engineering with Computers 32, 109–121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0402-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0402-5

Keywords

Navigation