Abstract
In this paper, we study mean-conditional value-at-risk portfolio optimization problem with short selling, cardinality constraints and transaction costs for large number of scenarios. To solve the large-scale mixed-integer model efficiently, conditional scenarios reduction technique and penalty alternating direction method are applied. The convergence of penalty alternating direction method is examined. Finally, experiments are conducted using the data set of the S &P index for 2020 to evaluate the proposed approaches in terms of CVaR values, CPU times and out-of-sample and in-sample Sharpe ratios. Results show that the proposed approaches significantly reduces the CPU times while keeping an acceptable degree of accuracy in terms of CVaR values. Also, out-of-sample and in-sample results show that the PADM and CS technique are reliable alternatives when the number of scenarios and stocks are large.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Financ 9(3):203–228
Basak S, Shapiro A (2001) Value-at-risk-based risk management: optimal policies and asset prices. Rev Financ Stud 14(2):371–405
Beltran-Royo C (2019) Fast scenario reduction by conditional scenarios in two-stage stochastic MILP problems. Optim Methods Softw 1–22
Bnouhachem A, Hamdi A, Xu M (2016) A new LQP alternating direction method for solving variational inequality problems with separable structure. Optimization 65(12):2251–2267
Burgard JP, Costa CM, Schmidt M (2020) Decomposition methods for robustified k-means clustering problems: if less conservative does not mean less bad. http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_HTML/2020/05/7799.html
Costa CM, Kreber D, Schmidt M (2020) An alternating method for cardinality-constrained optimization: a computational study for the best subset selection and sparse portfolio problem. http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_HTML/2020/11/8124.html
Dai Z, Wen F (2018) A generalized approach to sparse and stable portfolio optimization problem. J Ind Manag Optim 14(4):1651
Dupacova J, Gröwe-kuska N, Römisch W (2003) Scenario reduction in stochastic programming: an approach using probability metrics. Math Program 95(3):493–511
Ferreira FG, Cardoso RT (2021) Mean-cvar portfolio optimization approaches with variable cardinality constraint and rebalancing process. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28(5):3703–3720
Geißler B, Morsi A, Schewe L, Schmidt M (2017) Penalty alternating direction methods for mixed-integer optimization: a new view on feasibility pumps. SIAM J Optim 27(3):1611–1636
Goetzmann WN, Ingersoll JE, Spiegel MI, Welch I (2002) Sharpening sharpe ratios. NBER Working Paper No. w9116, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=325942
Gorski J, Pfeuffer F, Klamroth K (2007) Biconvex sets and optimization with biconvex functions: a survey and extensions. Math Methods Oper Res 66(3):373–407
Grant M, Boyd S, Ye Y (2013) CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.0 beta
Han D, Yuan X (2012) A note on the alternating direction method of multipliers. J Optim Theory Appl 155(1):227–238
Homem-de Mello T, Bayraksan G (2014) Monte Carlo sampling-based methods for stochastic optimization. Surv Oper Res Manag Sci 19(1):56–85
Hu J, Li H, Liu Z (2021) Scenario reduction based on correlation sensitivity and its application in microgrid optimization. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 31(3):12747
Karbasy SA, Salahi M (2019) A hybrid algorithm for the two-trust-region subproblem. Comput Appl Math 38(3):1–19
Khodamoradi T, Salahi M, Najafi AR (2020) A note on CCMV portfolio optimization model with short selling and risk-neutral interest rate. Stat Optim Inf Comput 8(3):740–748
Khodamoradi T, Salahi M, Najafi AR (2021) Cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization with short selling and risk-neutral interest rate. Decis Econ Financ 44(1):197–214
Kleinert T, Schmidt M (2021) Computing feasible points of bilevel problems with a penalty alternating direction method. INFORMS J Comput 33(1):198–215
Kobayashi K, Takano Y, Nakata K (2021) Bilevel cutting-plane algorithm for cardinality-constrained mean-cvar portfolio optimization. J Glob Optim 81(2):493–528
Konno H, Waki H, Yuuki A (2002) Portfolio optimization under lower partial risk measures. Asia Pac Financ Mark 9(2):127–140
Lo AW (2002) The statistics of Sharpe ratios. Financ Anal J 58(4):36–52
Pineda S, Conejo A (2010) Scenario reduction for risk-averse electricity trading. IET Gener Transm Distrib 4(6):694–705
Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–42
Taleghani R, Salahi M (2019) An ADMM-factorization algorithm for low rank matrix completion. Appl Appl Math 14(2):1145–1156
Teng Y, Yang L, Yu B, Song X (2017) A penalty PALM method for sparse portfolio selection problems. Optim Methods Softw 32(1):126–147
Woodside-Oriakhi M, Lucas C, Beasley JE (2013) Portfolio rebalancing with an investment horizon and transaction costs. Omega 41(2):406–420
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank both reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khodamoradi, T., Salahi, M. Extended mean-conditional value-at-risk portfolio optimization with PADM and conditional scenario reduction technique. Comput Stat 38, 1023–1040 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-022-01263-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-022-01263-y