Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Computing the halfspace depth with multiple try algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The halfspace depth is a powerful tool for the nonparametric multivariate analysis. However, its computation is very challenging for it involves the infimum over infinitely many directional vectors. The exact computation of the halfspace depth is a NP-hard problem if both sample size n and dimension d are parts of input. The approximate algorithms often can not get accurate (exact) results in high dimensional cases within limited time. In this paper, we propose a new general stochastic optimization algorithm, which is the combination of simulated annealing and the multiple try Metropolis algorithm. As a by product of the new algorithm, it is then successfully applied to the computation of the halfspace depth of data sets which are not necessarily in general position. The simulation and real data examples indicate that the new algorithm is highly competitive to, especially in the high dimension and large sample cases, other (exact and approximate) algorithms, including the simulated annealing and the quasi-Newton method and so on, both in accuracy and efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Byrd RH, Liu P, Nocedal J, Zhu C (1995) A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM J Sci Comput 16:1190–1208

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Casarin R, Craiu R, Leisen R (2013) Interacting multiple try algorithms with different proposal distributions. Stat Comput 23:185–200

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Morin P, Wagner U (2013) Absolute approximation of Tukey depth: theory and experiments. Comput Geom 46:566–573

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cuesta-Albertos JA, Nieto-Reyes A (2008) The random Tukey depth. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:4979–4988

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta S, Ghosh AK (2012) On robust classification using projection depth. Ann Inst Stat Math 64:657–676

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dyckerhoff R, Mozharovskyi P (2016) Exact computation of the halfspace depth. Comput Stat Data Anal 98:19–30

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6:721–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings WK (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57:97–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes MR, Stiefel E (1952) Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. J Res Natl Bur Stand 49:409–436

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lange T, Mosler K, Mozharovskyi P (2014) Fast nonparametric classification based on data depth. Stat Pap 55:49–69

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liang F, Liu C, Carroll RJ (2011) Advanced markov chain Monte Carlo methods: learning from past samples. Wiley, West Sussex

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liang F, Cheng Y, Lin G (2014) Simulated stochastic approximation annealing for global optimization with a square-root cooling schedule. J Am Stat Assoc 109:847–863

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JS (2001) Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X (2017) Fast implementation of the Tukey depth. Comput Stat 32:1395–1410

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JS, Liang F, Wong WH (2000) The multiple-try and local optimization in Metropolis sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 95:121–134

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zuo Y (2014) Computing halfspace depth and regression depth. Commun Stat Simul Comput 43:969–985

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zuo Y, Wang Q (2017) Finite sample breakdown point of Tukey’s halfspace median. Sci China Math 60(5):861–874

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Martino L, Olmo VPD, Read J (2012) A multi-point Metropolis scheme with generic weight functions. Stat Probab Lett 82:1445–1453

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:1087–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pandolfi S, Bartolucci F, Friel N (2010) A generalization of the multiple-try Metropolis algorithm for Bayesian estimation and model selection. J Mach Learn Res 9:581–588

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Rousseeuw PJ, Hubert M (1999) Regression depth. J Am Stat Assoc 94:388–402

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw PJ, Struyf A (1998) Computing location depth and regression depth in higher dimensions. Stat Comput 8:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruszczynski A (2006) Nonlinear optimization. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shao W, Guo G (2018) Multiple-try simulated annealing algorithm for global optimization. Math Probl Eng 2018:1–11

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shao W, Zuo Y (2012) Simulated annealing for higher dimensional projection depth. Comput Stat Data Anal 56:4026–4036

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shao W, Guo G, Zhao G, Meng F (2014) Simulated annealing for the bounds of Kendall’s tau and Spearman’s rho. J Stat Comput Simul 84:2688–2699

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey JW (1975) Mathematrics and the picturing of data. Proc Int Cong Math 2:523–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo Y, Serfling R (2000) General notions of statistical depth function. Ann Stat 28:461–482

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Editor, Associate Editor and reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions, which led to distinctive improvements in this paper. The first author’s research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11501320, 71471101, 11426143), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2014AP008) and the Natural Science Foundation of Qufu Normal University (bsqd20130114).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Shao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shao, W., Zuo, Y. Computing the halfspace depth with multiple try algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm. Comput Stat 35, 203–226 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-019-00906-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-019-00906-x

Keywords

Navigation