Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Information modeling for cyber-physical production system based on digital twin and AutomationML

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Production systems play an important role in intelligent manufacturing. A large number of manufacturing resources are designed and developed with virtual (digital) ones, which will be associated with the physical ones throughout their lifecycle. With the recent emergence of information and communications technologies (ICTs), such as internet of things, big data, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, and 5G, the interconnection and interaction between physical resources and virtual ones become possible in production systems. Digital twin (DT) shows great potential to realize the cyber-physical production system (CPPS) in the era of Industry 4.0. In this paper, we present our vision on integrating various physical resources into CPPS via DT and AutomationML. To elaborate on how to apply ICTs, this paper firstly explores a generic architecture of CPPS based on DT. DT is a virtual and authoritative representation of physical manufacturing resource, since DT includes various models and manufacturing big data of resource. The proposed architecture is illustrated in detail as follows: (1) physical layer, (2) network layer, (3) virtual layer, and (4) application layer. A case of expert fault diagnose for aircraft engine is presented using the proposed information fusion in the architecture. Secondly, this paper proposes an approach of information modeling for CPPS based on AutomationML. Various manufacturing services can be encapsulated and defined in the standardized format (AutomationML), and then the corresponding virtual manufacturing resources (DTs) will be integrated into CPPS. Finally, this paper describes a case of information modeling for blisk machining and demonstrates the modeling approach in real-life scenarios for support manufacturing resource sharing via DT. Furthermore, the conclusion and further work is briefly summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schuja A, Bartelt M, Kuhlenkotter B (2014) From conception phase up to virtual verification using AutomationML. Procedia CIRP 23:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keller M, Rosenberg M, Brettel M, Friederichsen N (2014) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng 8:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  3. Posada J, Toro C, Barandiaran I, Oyarzun D, Stricker D, De Amicis R, Pinto EB, Eisert P, Döllner J, Vallarino I (2015) Visual computing as key enabling technology for industry 4.0 and industrial internet. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 35(2):26–40

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koren Y, Shpitalni M (2010) Design of reconfiguration manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 29(1):30–41

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lu Y, Xu X (2018) Resource virtualization: a core technology for developing cyber-physical production systems. J Manuf Syst 47:128–140

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y, Qian C, Lv J, Liu Y (2016) Agent and cyber-physical system based self-organizing and self-adaptive intelligent shopfloor. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 13(2):737–747

    Google Scholar 

  7. Danny Anandan P, Ferreira P, Lohse N, Guedes M (2017) An AutomationML model for plug-and-produce assembly systems. In: IEEE Int Conf Ind Inf, Emden, Germany, pp 849–854

  8. Haag S, Anderl R (2018) Digital twin-proof of concept. Manuf Let 15(Part B):64–66

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buckholtz B, Ragai I, Wang L (2015) Cloud manufacturing: current trends and future implementations. J Manuf Sci Eng 137(4):1–46

    Google Scholar 

  10. Colombo AW, Karnouskos S, Bangemann T (2014) IMC-AESOP outcomes: paving the way to collaborative manufacturing systems. In: IEEE Int Conf Ind Inform, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, pp 255–260

  11. Morgan J, O’Donnel GE (2015) The cyber physical implementation of cloud manufacturing monitoring systems. Procedia CIRP 33:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang XV, Wang L (2017) A cloud-based production system for information and service integration: an internet of things case study on waste electronics. Enterp Inf Syst 11(7):952–968

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tao F, Cheng Y, Xu L, Zhang L, Li BH (2014) CCIoT-CMfg: cloud computing and internet of things-based cloud manufacturing service system. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10(2):1435–1442

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ashton K (2009) That ‘internet of things’ thing. RFiD J 22:97–114

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang S, Zhang G, Shen B, Xie X (2011) An integrated scheme for cyber-physical building energy management system. Procedia Eng 15:3616–3620

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rudtsch V, Gausemeier J, Gesing J, Mittag T, Peter S (2014) Pattern-based business model development for cyber-physical production systems. Procedia CIRP 25:313–319

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cardin O (2019) Classification of cyber-physical production systems applications: proposition of an analysis framework. Comput Ind 104:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  18. Monostori L (2014) Cyber-physical production systems: roots expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP 17:9–13

    Google Scholar 

  19. Um J, Weyer S, Quint F (2017) Plug and simulate within modular assembly line enabled by digital twins and the use of Automationml. IFAC Proc 50(1):15904–15909

    Google Scholar 

  20. Talkhestania BA, Jazdib N, Schloeglc W, Weyrichb M (2018) Consistency check to synchronize the digital twin of manufacturing automation based on anchor points. Procedia CIRP 72:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  21. Uhlemann TH, Lehmann C, Steinhilper R (2017) The digital twin realizing the cyber physical production system for industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 61:335–340

    Google Scholar 

  22. Terkaj W, Urgo M(2014)Ontology-based modeling of production systems for design and performance evaluation. In: IEEE Int Conf Ind Informatics, Porto Alegre, Brazil, pp 748–753

  23. Zhang HJ, Yan Q, Liu YP, Jiang ZQ (2016) An integer-coded differential evolution algorithm for simple assembly line balancing problem of type 2. Assem Autom 36(3):246–261

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang HJ, Zhang GH, Yan Q (2018) Digital twin-driven cyber-physical production system towards smart shop-floor. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput 10:4439–4453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1125-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hatvany J, Nemes L (1978) Intelligent manufacturing systems-a tentative forecast. IFAC Proc 11(1):895–899

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ueda K, Vaario J (1998) The biological manufacturing system: adaptation to growing complexity and dynamics in manufacturing environment. CIRP J Manuf Syst 27(1):41–46

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ueda K, Vaario J, Ohkura K (1997) Modeling of biological manufacturing systems for dynamic reconfiguration. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 46(1):343–346

    Google Scholar 

  28. Koren Y, Heisel Z, Jovane F, Moriwaki T, Pritschow G, Ulsoy G, Van Brussel H (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 48(2):527–540

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kádár B, Lengyel A, Monostori L, Suginishi Y, Pfeiffer A, Nonaka Y (2010) Enhanced control of complex production structures by tight coupling of the digital and the physical worlds. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(1):437–440

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kádár B, Terkaj W, Sacco M (2013) Semantic virtual factory supporting interoperable modeling and evaluation of production systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):443–446

    Google Scholar 

  31. Maropoulos PG (2002) Digital enterprise technology-defining perspectives and research priorities. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 16(7–8):467–478

    Google Scholar 

  32. Westkämper E, Von Briel R (2001) Continuous improvement and participative factory planning by computer systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 50(1):347–352

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bongaerts L, Monostori L, McFarlane D, Kádár B (2000) Hierarchy in distributed shop floor control. Comput Ind 43(2):123–137

    Google Scholar 

  34. Márkus A, Kis T, Váncza J, Monostori L (1996) A market approach to holonic manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 45(1):433–436

    Google Scholar 

  35. Monostori L, Váncza J, Kumara SRT (2006) Agent-based systems for manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 55(2):697–720

    Google Scholar 

  36. Valckenaers P, Brussel HV (2015) Design for the unexpected from holonic manufacturing systems towards a humane mechatronics society. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  37. Valckenaers P, Van Brussel H (2005) Holonic manufacturing execution systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(1):427–432

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van Brussel H, Wyns J, Valckenaers P, Bongaerts L, Peeters P (1998) Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA. Comput Ind 37:255–274

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vogel-Heuser B, Lee J, Leitão P (2015) Agents enabling cyber-physical production systems. Automatisierungstechnik 63(10):777–789

    Google Scholar 

  40. Givehchi O, Jasperneite J (2013) Industrial automation services as part of the cloud: first experiences. In: Proceedings of the Jahreskolloquium Kommunikation in der Automation, KommA Magdeburg, Germany, pp 1–10

  41. Gupta A, Kumar M, Hansel S, Saini A (2013) Future of all technologies-the cloud and cyber physical systems. Int J Enhanced Res Sci Tech Eng 2(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mezgár I, Rauschecker U (2014) The challenge of networked enterprises for cloud computing interoperability. Comput Ind 65(4):657–674

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schlechtendahl J, Kretschmer F, Lechler A, Verl A (2014) Communication mechanisms for cloud based machine controls. Procedia CIRP 17:830–834

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schlechtendahl J, Kretschmer F, Sang Z, Lechler A, Xu X (2017) Extend study of network capability for cloud based control systems. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 43:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wang LH, Törngren M, Onori M (2015) Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 37:517–527

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lee EA (2006) Cyber-physical systems-are computing foundations adequate? In: NSF Shop floor on Cyber-Phys Syst: Research Motivation, Techniques and Roadmap, Austin, TX, pp 1–9

  47. Rojas RA, Rauch E (2019) From a literature review to a conceptual framework of enablers for intelligent manufacturing control. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(1–4):517–533

    Google Scholar 

  48. Woo J, Shin SJ, Seo W, Meilanitasari P (2018) Developing a big data analytics platform for manufacturing systems: architecture, method, and implementation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99(9–12):2193–2217

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhuang CB, Liu JH, Xiong H (2018) Digital twin-based smart production management and control framework for the complex product assembly shop-floor. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1–4):1149–1163

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schlechtendahl J, Keinert M, Kretschmer F, Lechler A, Verl A (2014) Making existing production systems industry 4.0-ready: holistic approach to the integration of existing production systems in industry 4.0 environments. Prod Eng 9(1):143–148

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Let 3:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  52. Monostori L, Kádár B, Bauernhanslcd T, Kondoh S, Kumara S, Reinhart G, Sauer O, Schuh G, Sihn W, Ueda K (2016) Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. CIRP Ann 65(2):621–641

    Google Scholar 

  53. Botond K, Terkaj W, Sacco M (2013) Semantic virtual factory supporting interoperable modeling and evaluation of production systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(1):443–446

    Google Scholar 

  54. Usländer T, Epple U (2015) Reference model of industrie 4.0 service architectures. Automatisierungstechnik 63(10):858–866

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ma SY, Zhang YF, Lv JX, Yang HD, Wu JZ (2019) Energy-cyber-physical system enabled management for energy-intensive manufacturing industries. J Clean Prod 226:892–903

    Google Scholar 

  56. Domingues P, Carreira P, Vieira R, Kastner W (2016) Building automation systems: concepts and technology review. Comput Stand Interfaces 45:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  57. Morariu C, Morariu O, Borangiu T, Raileanu S (2012) Manufacturing service bus integration model for highly flexible and scalable manufacturing systems. IFAC Proc 14(1):1850–1855

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang YF, Guo ZG, Lv JX, Liu Y (2018) A framework for smart production-logistics systems based on CPS and industrial IoT. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 14(9):4019–4031

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ye X, Hong SH (2018) An AutomationML/OPC UA-based industry 4.0 solution for a manufacturing system. In: IEEE Int Conf Emerging Technol Factory Autom, Torino, Italy, pp 543–550

  60. Coronado PDU, Lynn R, Louhichi W, Parto M, Wescoat E, Kurfess T (2018) Part data integration in the shop floor digital twin: mobile and cloud technologies to enable a manufacturing execution system. J Manuf Syst 48:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  61. Negri E, Fumagalli L, Macchi M (2017) A review of the roles of digital twin in cps-based production systems. Procedia Manuf 11:939–948

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rosen R, Wichert G, Lo G, Bettenhausen KD (2015) About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC Proc 48(3):67–72

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wang J, Ma Y, Zhang L, Gao R, Wu D (2018) Deep learning for smart manufacturing: methods and applications. J Manuf Syst 48:144–156

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lee J, Lapira E, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2013) Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. Manuf Lett 1(1):38–41

    Google Scholar 

  65. Uhlemann THJ, Schock C, Lehmann C, Freiberger S, Steinhilper R (2017) The digital twin: demonstrating the potential of real time data acquisition in production systems. Procedia Manuf 9:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hochhalter J, Leser WP, Newman JA, Gupta VK, Yamakov V, Cornell SR, Willard SA, Heber G (2014) Coupling damage-sensing particles to the digital twin concept. NASA Center for Aerospace Information. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006408. Accessed 27 Sept 2019

  67. Lightfoot H, Baines T, Smart P (2013) The servitization of manufacturing: a systematic literature review of interdependent trends. Int J Oper Prod Managt 33(11/12):1408–1434

    Google Scholar 

  68. Xu X (2012) From cloud computing to cloud manufacturing, robotics and computer-integrated manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28(1):75–86

    Google Scholar 

  69. Qi Q, Tao F, Zuo Y, Zhao D (2018) Digital twin service towards smart manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 72:237–242

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pennington A, Alison McKay A, Susan Bloor MS (1996) A framework for product data, knowledge and data engineering. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 8(5):825–838

    Google Scholar 

  71. Schroeder GN, Steinmetz C, Pereira CE, Espindola DB (2016) Digital twin data modeling with AutomationML and a communication methodology for data exchange. IFAC Proc 49(30):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  72. Choi S, Jung K, Kulvatunyou B, Morris KC (2016) An analysis of technologies and standards for designing smart manufacturing systems. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 121:422–433

    Google Scholar 

  73. Luder A, Schmidt N, Rosendahl R, John M (2014) Integrating different information types within AutomationML. In: IEEE Int Conf Emer Technol Fact Autom, Barcelona, Spain, pp 1–5

  74. Drath R, Luder A, Peschke J, Hundt L (2008) AutomationML-the glue for seamless automation engineering. In: IEEE Int Conf Emerg Technol Fact Autom, Hamburg, Germany, pp 616–623

  75. Whitepaper OPC Unified architecture information model for AutomationML. https://www.automationml.org/o.red.c/news-173.html. Accessed 1 June 2019

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the valuable comments from the editor and anonymous reviewers.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (51705472), Humanities and Social Sciences Project of Ministry of Education of China (19YJCZH209), and Key Science and Technology Program of Henan Province (202102210076).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Aeronautical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou, 450015, People’s Republic of China

    Haijun Zhang & Zhenghua Wen

  2. School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou, 450015, People’s Republic of China

    Qiong Yan

Authors
  1. Haijun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiong Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhenghua Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haijun Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Yan, Q. & Wen, Z. Information modeling for cyber-physical production system based on digital twin and AutomationML. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107, 1927–1945 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05056-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05056-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation