Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasonography and articular cartilage defects in the knee: an in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of cartilage thickness and defect size assessment

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Abstract

The purpose of this cadaver study was to test the accuracy of ultrasonography in measuring cartilage thickness, and the extent and depth of induced cartilage defects on the medial and lateral femoral condyles of the knee in a clinically relevant setting. With the knees maximally flexed, cartilage thickness was measured at 24 marked sites in four knees with a 10 MHz probe. The areas of measurement were then excised and the thickness measured with a calliper gauge. In another seven cadaver knees, 21 cartilage defects were produced. The defect diameter varied from 4 to 8 mm. The depths of the defects were either a partial cartilage defect (grade 2), a defect to intact subchondral bone (grade 3), or a defect involving subchondral bone (grade 4) (classification by ICRS). The limits of agreement between ultrasonography and calliper gauge measurement for cartilage thickness were χdiff±2SDdiff=0.0±0.4 mm. For cartilage defect diameter, the limits of agreement between ultrasonography and the slide ruler measurement were χdiff±2SDdiff=−0.2±1.0 mm. For the depths of the lesions there was a 100% agreement between radiologist and actual lesion depth for the classification into International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grades 2, 3, and 4. Our conclusion is that ultrasonography is capable of measuring accurately both cartilage thickness and the extent and depth of induced cartilage defects in a cadaver model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aisen AM, McCune WJ, MacGuire A, Carson PL, Silver TM, Jafri SZ,Martel W (1984) Sonographic evaluation of the cartilage of the knee. Radiology 153:781–784

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bredalla MA, Tirman PFJ, Peterfy CG et al (1999) Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. Am J Roentgenol 172:1073–1080

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Castriota-Scanderbeg A, De MV, Scarale MG, Bonetti MG, Cammisa M (1996) Precision of sonographic measurement of articular cartilage: inter- and intraobserver analysis. Skeletal Radiol 25:545–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cherin E, Saied A, Laugier P, Netter P, Berger G (1998) Evaluation of acoustical parameter sensitivity to age-related and osteoarthritic changes in articular cartilage using 50 MHz ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 24:341–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiang EH, Laing TJ, Meyer CR, Boes JL, Rubin JM, Adler RS (1997) Ultrasonic characterization of in vitro osteoarthritic articular cartilage with validation by confocal microscopy. Ultrasound Med Biol 23:205–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG et al (1996) Fat-suppressed three-dimensionel spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 167:127–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Disler DG, Raymond E, May DA, Wayne JS, McCauley TR (2000) Articular cartilage defects: in vitro evaluation of accuracy and interobserver reliability for detection and grading with US. Radiology 215:846–851

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gregersen HE, Rasmussen OS (1989) Ultrasonography of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. A preliminary report. Acta Radiol 30:552–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Udvarhelyi I, Szigiti I, Bely M (1998) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular cartilage defects: application in clinical practice. Orthopedics 21:751–756

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Iagnocco A, Coari G, Zoppini A (1992) Sonographic evaluation of femoral condylar cartilage in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 21:201–203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martino F, Ettorre GC, Angelelli G, Macarini L, Patella V, Moretti B, D’Amore M, Cantatore FP (1993) Validity of echographic evaluation of cartilage in gonarthrosis. Preliminary report. Clin Rheumatol 12:178–183

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCune WJ, Dedrick DK, Aisen AM, MacGuire A (1990) Sonographic evaluation of osteoarthritic femoral condylar cartilage. Correlation with operative findings. Clin Orthop 230–235

  14. Myers SL, Dines K, Brandt KD, Albrecht ME (1995) Experimental assessment by high frequency ultrasound of cartilage thickness and osteoarthritic changes. J Rheumatol 22:109–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA, Schils JP, Belhobek GH (1996) Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology 198:209–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saied A, Cherin E, Gaucher H et al (1997) Assessment of articular cartilage and subchondral bone: subtle and progressive changes in experimental osteoarthritis using 50 MHz echography in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 12:1378–1386

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steadman J R, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK et al (1997) The microfracture: microfracture technique for full-thickness chondral defects: technique and clinical results. Op Tech Orthop 7:300–304

    Google Scholar 

  18. Toyras J, Lyyra-Laitinen T, Niinimaki M, Lindgren R, Nieminen MT, Kiviranta I, Jurvelin JS (2001) Estimation of the Young’s modulus of articular cartilage using an arthroscopic indentation instrument and ultrasonic measurement of tissue thickness. J Biomech 34:251–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tyyni A, Karlsson J (2000) Biological treatment of joint cartilage damage. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:249–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank the Department of Functional Anatomy, University of Copenhagen, for supplying specimens for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Konradsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mathiesen, O., Konradsen, L., Torp-Pedersen, S. et al. Ultrasonography and articular cartilage defects in the knee: an in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of cartilage thickness and defect size assessment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12, 440–443 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0489-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0489-x

Keywords

Navigation