Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Toward a benchmarking framework for research into bio-inspired hardware-software artefacts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we suggest that one of the more crucial tasks currently facing researchers into the field of autonomous mobile robotics is the provision of a common task, or set of tasks, as a means of evaluating different approaches to robot design and architecture, and the generation of a common set of experimental frameworks to facilitate these different approaches. This paper stars with a brief introduction to the field, and behavior-based control in particular. We then discuss the issue of animal versus robot behavior, and focus on simulated experimentation versus embodied robotics. Finally, we move to the feasibility of evaluating and benchmarking different architectures, with the aim of producing mobile robots of continuously higher utility, with specific reference to our current four-layered robot control architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Cliff D, Miller GF (1996) Co-evolution of pursuit and evasion. II. Simulation methods and results. In: 4th International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour (SAB'96), MIT Press, Cape Cod p 506–515

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collins JJ, Eaton M (1999) Open issues in the design and synthesis of intelligent robot control architectures. Proceedings of the 10th Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, University College Cork, Cork p 108–116

  3. Saffiotti A (1997) The uses of fuzzy logic in autonomous robot navigation. Soft Computing 1 (4): 180–197.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arkin R (1998) Behaviour-based robotics, MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Connell J (1992) SSS: a hybrid architecture applied to robot navigation. Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE Press Nice, p 2719–2724

  6. Gat E (1991) Integrating reaction and planning in a heterogeneous asynchronous architecture for mobile robot navigation. SIGART Bull 2(4):70–74

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks R (1991) New approaches to robotics. Science 253:1227–1232

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gat E (1995) Towards a principled experimental study of autonomous mobile robots. Autonomous Rob 2:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Floreano D, Mondada F (1998) Hardware solutions for evolutionary robotics. In: Evolutionary Robotics. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop, Springer Verlag LNCS 1468, p 137–151

  10. Miller GF (1995) Artificial life as theoretical biology: how to do real science with computer simulation. University of Sussex, CSRP 378

  11. Brooks R (1992) Artificial life and real robots, In: 1st European Conference on Artificial Life, MIT Press, Cambridge, p 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kitano H, Asada M, Kuniyoshi Y, et al. (1995) Robo Cup: the robot world cup initiative. IJCAI-95 Workshop on Entertainment and AI/Alife, Morgan Kaufman, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Garis H (1989) what if AI succeeds? The rise of the twenty-first century artilect. Artificial Intelligence Magazine (cover story), Summer

  14. Sipper M, Sanchez E, Mange D, et al. (1997) A phylogenetic, ontogenetic, and epigenetic view of bio-inspired hardware systems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1 (1): 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Floreano D, Urzelai J (2000) Evolutionary robotics: the next generation. In: Gomi T (ed) Evolutionary robotics. III. AAI Books, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thrun S, Bucken A, Burgard W et al. (1998) Map learning and high-speed navigation in RHINO. In: Kortenkamp D, Bonasso RP, Murphy R (eds) Artificial intelligence and mobile robots. AAAI/MIT Press, Menlo Park, California, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, p 21–52

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koenig S, Simmons RG (1998) Xavier: a robot navigation architecture based on partially observable markov decision process models. In: Kortenkamp D, Bonasso RP, Murphy R (eds) Artificial intelligence and mobile robots. AAAI/MIT Press, Menlo-Park, California, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, p 91–112

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gat E (1998) Three-layer Architectures. In: Kortenkamp YD, Bonasso RP, Murphy R (eds) Artificial intelligence and mobile robots. AAAI/MIT Press, Menlo Park, California, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, p 195–210

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brooks R (1986) A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Trans Rob Autom, 2:14–23

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Konolige K, Myers K (1998) The Saphira architecture for automomous mobile robots. In: Kortenkamp D, Bonasso RP, Murphy R (eds) Artificial intelligence and mobile robots. AAAI/MIT Press, Menlo Park, California, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, p 211–242

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao J, Michalewicz ZL, Zhang L, et al. (1997) Adaptive evolutionary planner/navigator for mobile robots. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1(1):18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Collins JJ, Sheehan L, Casey C (1998) Evolutionary path generation for navigation in mobile robots. In: 7th European Workshop on Robot Learing (EWLR98), University Edinburgh, Edinburgh, p 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  23. Collins, JJ, Eaton M, Sheehan L, et al. (1999) Four-layered robot control architecture In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Oita University, Oita 1:347–350

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, College of Informatics and Electronics, University of Limerick, Ireland

    Malachy Eaton, J. J. Collins & Lucia Sheehan

Authors
  1. Malachy Eaton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. J. Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lucia Sheehan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malachy Eaton.

About this article

Cite this article

Eaton, M., Collins, J.J. & Sheehan, L. Toward a benchmarking framework for research into bio-inspired hardware-software artefacts. Artif Life Robotics 5, 40–45 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481319

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481319

Key words

Search

Navigation