Abstract
Punctually and appropriate maintenance of pavement black top surface using suitable material and method is significant for the preservation of road assets and to serve the intended purpose. An adequate maintenance management system that would be useful to highway agencies in regularly planning pavement maintenance strategies to ensure the minimal maintenance fund is used rationally. The target of this paper is to develop a hypothetic overall pavement condition index (OPCI) for the maintenance strategy selection for Indian Highways, exclusively for flexible pavements. This index incorporates salient indicators as distress, structural capacity, roughness and skid resistance. The distress index has been computed considering the maximum allowable extent principle. Multiplicative Index Approach was applied to develop OPCI. An expert opinion survey was conducted to evaluate the weightage for each indicator using the relative impact on pavement condition. The results reveal that the weight factor is 0.6 for structure capacity, 0.5 for roughness and 0.15 for skid resistance which is lower than the distress weight factor. The relative importance that should be given to each indicator are calculated to be 80% for distresses, 10% for structural capacity, 8% for roughness and 2% for skid resistance. The combined distress pavement condition index infests in almost one higher rating scale than PCI whereas OPCI is 21% lower than the PCI. This indicates the requirement of a conservative maintenance alternative. However, a condition indicator that consists of multiple indices is much more important in identifying suitable maintenance alternative approaches to fully restore the structural integrity and riding quality of the pavement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AASHTO (2012) Pavement Management Guide, Summary Report, American Association of State Highway & Transport Officials, Washington, DC, USA
Abu-Samra S, Zayed T, Tabra W (2017) Pavement condition rating using multiattribute utility theory. J Transp Eng Part B Pavements 143:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000011
Al-Haddad AHA, Al-Haydari ISJ (2018) Modeling of flexible pavement serviceability based on the fuzzy logic theory. J Transp Eng Part B Pavements 144:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000026
ASTM D6433 (2011) Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys. In: West Consh. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
Burns JC (1981) Roughness and roadway safety. Transp Res Rec 836:8–14
Butt AA, Shahin MY, Feighan KJ, Carpenter SH (1987) Pavement performance prediction model using the Markov process. Transp Res Rec 12–19
Desolminihac HE, Hudson WR, Ricci E, Division TP (1986) Serviceability ratings of Texas highway system. Research report. 400–1F, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin
Fwa TF, Sinha KC, Riverson JDN (1990) Influence of rehabilitation decisions on pavement-maintenance planning. J Transp Eng 116:197–212. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1990)116:2(197)
Gharaibeh NG, Zou Y, Saliminejad S (2010) Assessing the agreement among pavement condition indexes. J Transp Eng 136:765–772
Haas R, Hudson WR (2015) Pavement asset management, Seventh Ed. Wiley Publication
Huang YH (2008) Pavement analysis and design. Second Ed. Pearson Education
IRC:81 (1997) Strengthening of flexible road pavements using bankelman beam deflection. Indian Road Congress, New Delhi, 1–23
IRC:82 (2015) Code of practice for maintenance of bituminous surfaces of highways. Indian Road Congress, New Delhi, 1–74
IRC:SP:16 (2004) Guidelines for the surface evenness of highway pavements. Indian Road Congress, New Delhi, 1–16
Juang CH, Amirkhanian SN (1992) Unified pavement distress index for managing flexible pavements. J Transp Eng 118:686–699. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:5(686)
Kameyama S, Kasahara A, Himeno K, Ikeda T (1998) Optimization of maintenance and rehabilitation strategy using structural capacity index and surface distress index. 4th International Conference on Managing Pavements, vol. 2, pp 839–853
Meegoda JN, Gao S (2014) Roughness progression model for asphalt pavements using long-term pavement performance data. J Transp Eng 140:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000682
MoRTH (2018) ANNUAL REPORT 2018–19. Government of India, New Delhi
Mubaraki M (2014) Identification of pavement distress types and pavement condition evaluation based on network level inspection for Jazan city road network. J Eng Res 11:44–54. https://doi.org/10.24200/tjer.vol11iss1pp44-54
Ndume V, Mlavi E, Mwaipungu R (2020) Development of road pavement condition index using combined parameters. 10:53–62. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jce.20201003.01
Pinatt JM, Chicati ML, Ildefonso JS, Filetti CRGD arc. (2020) Evaluation of pavement condition index by different methods: Case study of Maringá, Brazil. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 4:100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100100
Reddy BB, Veeraragavan A (2001) Priority ranking model for managing flexible pavements at network level. Journal of Indian Road Congress, pp 379–394
Sayers MW, Gillespie TD, Queiroz CAV (1986) The international road roughness experiment: establishing correlation and a calibration standard for measurements. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Setyawan A, Nainggolan J, Budiarto A (2015) Predicting the remaining service life of road using pavement condition index. Procedia Eng 125:417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.108
Shah YU, Jain SS, Tiwari D, Jain MK (2013) Development of overall pavement condition index for urban road network. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci 104:332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.126
Shahin MY (2009) Pavement management for airports, roads, and, parking lots. Second Ed., Springer, Berln
Shahin MY, Walther JA (1990) Pavement maintenance management for roads and streets using PAVER system. Tehchnical Dep U.S. Army, pp 1–282
Shiyab AMSH (2007) Optimum use of the flexible pavement condition indicators in pavement management system. Curtin Univ. Technol. Dep. Civ. Eng. Ph.D
Sinha A, Hagawane P, Engineering C (2020) Method comparison of pavement condition rating based on IRC & ASTM guidelines. Int Res J Eng Tech, pp 2520–2524
Suman SK, Sanjeev S (2012) Pavement performance modelling using Markov chain. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium On Engineering Under Uncertainty: Safety Assessment And Management (ISEUSAM - 2012), Chapter - 39. pp 619–627
Suman SK, Sinha S (2012) Pavement maintenance treatment selection using fuzzy logic inference system. Int J Eng Innov Technol 2:172–175
Tawalare A, Vasudeva Raju K (2016) Pavement performance index for Indian rural roads. Perspect Sci 8:447–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.101
Acknowledgements
The authors declare that the contents of this article have not been published previously. All the authors have contributed to the work described, read and approved the contents for publication in this journal.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors have no conflict of interest with the funding entity and any organization mentioned in this article in the past three years that may have influenced the conduct of this research and the findings.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, R., Suman, S.K. Development of overall pavement condition index for maintenance strategy selection for Indian highways. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 13, 832–843 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01344-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01344-z