Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Multi-Objective Cooperative Salvo Attack Against Group Target

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a solution for the problem of cooperative salvo attack of multiple cruise missiles against targets in a group. Synchronization of the arrival time of missiles to hit their common target, minimizing the time consumption of attack and maximizing the expected damage to group targets are taken into consideration simultaneously. These operational objectives result in a hierarchical mixed-variable optimization problem which includes two types of subproblems, namely the multi-objective missile-target assignment (MOMTA) problem at the upper level and the time-optimal coordinated path planning (TOCPP) problems at the lower level. In order to solve the challenging problem, a recently proposed coordinated path planning method is employed to solve the TOCPP problems to achieve the soonest salvo attack against each target. With the aim of finding a more competent solver for MOMTA, three state-of-the-art multi-objective optimization methods (MOMs), namely NSGA-II, MOEA/D and DMOEA-εC, are adopted. Finally, a typical example is used to demonstrate the advantage of the proposed method. A simple rule-based method is also employed for comparison. Comparative results show that DMOEA-εC is the best choice among the three MOMs for solving the MOMTA problem. The combination of DMOEA-εC for MOMTA and the coordinated path planning method for TOCPP can generate obviously better salvo attack schemes than the rule-based method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jeon I S, Lee J I, and Tahk M J, Impact-time-control guidance law for anti-ship missiles, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2006, 14(2): 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee J I, Jeon I S, and Tahk M J, Guidance law to control impact time and angle, IEEE Trans. Aerosp Electron Syst, 2007, 43(1): 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeon I S and Lee J I, Homing guidance law for cooperative attack of multiple missiles, J. Guidance Contr. Dyn., 2010, 33(1): 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao S Y and Zhou R, Cooperative guidance for multi-missile salvo attack, Chin J Aeronaut, 2008, 21(6): 533–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zou L, Kong F E, Zhou R, et al., Distributed adaptive cooperative guidance for multi-missile salvo attack, J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut., 2012, 38(1): 128–132.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y A, Wang X L, and Wu H L, Impact time control guidance law with field of view constraint, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2014, 39: 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou J, Yang J, and Li Z, Simultaneous attack of a stationary target using multiple missiles: A consensus-based approach, Sci. China Inform. Sci., 2017, 60(7): 1–14.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang L, Yao Y, He F H, et al., A novel cooperative mid-course guidance scheme for multiple intercepting missiles, Chin. J. Aeronaut., 2017, 30(3): 1140–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeng J, Dou L H, and Xin B, A joint mid-course and terminal course cooperative guidance law for multi-missile salvo attack, Chin. J. Aeronaut., 2017, http://pris.bit.edu.cn/docs/2017-12/20171220133830678433.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lloyd S P and Witsenhausen H S, Weapons allocation is NP-complete, Proc. IEEE Summer Simulation. Conference, Reno, NV, 1986, 1054–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Matlin S, A review of the literature on the missile allocation problem, Operations Research, 1970, 18(2): 334–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hosein P A, Walton J T, and Athans M, Dynamic weapon-target assignment problems with vulnerable C2 nodes, MIT Lab. Inf. Decis. Syst., Cambridge, U.K., 1988, LIDS-P-1786.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hosein P A and Athans M, Some analytical results for the dynamic weapon-target allocation problem, MIT Lab, Technical Report, Cambridge, U.K., 1990, LIDS-P-1944.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu L, Wang H Y, Lu F X, et al., An anytime algorithm based on modified GA for dynamic weapon-target allocation problem, Proc. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Hong Kong, China, 2008, 2020–2025.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al., A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE T. Evolut. Comput., 2002, 6(2): 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding S X, Chen C, Xin B, et al., A bi-objective load balancing model in a distributed simulation system using NSGA-II and MOPSO approaches, Appl. Soft Comput., 2018, 63: 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Q and Li H, MOEA/D: A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition, IEEE T. Evolut Comput, 2007, 11(6): 712–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen J, Li J, and Xin B, DMOEA-eC: Decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with the e-constraint framework, IEEE T. Evolut. Comput., 2017, 21(5): 714–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xin B, Chen J, Xu D L, et al., Hybrid encoding based differential evolution algorithms for Dubins traveling salesman problem with neighborhood, Control Theory Appl., 2014, 31(7): 941–954.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Srinivas M and Patnaik L M, Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1994, 24(6): 656–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Automation, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Decision of Complex Systems, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China

    Jie Zeng, Lihua Dou & Bin Xin

Authors
  1. Jie Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lihua Dou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bin Xin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Xin.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61673058 and the NSFC-Zhejiang Joint Fund for the Integration of Industrialization and Informatization under Grant No. U1609214.

This paper was recommended for publication by Guest Editor LIU Tengfei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, J., Dou, L. & Xin, B. Multi-Objective Cooperative Salvo Attack Against Group Target. J Syst Sci Complex 31, 244–261 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-018-7437-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-018-7437-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation