The evolution of female authorship in computing research

• Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79(3), 517–539.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Aksnes, D. W., Rørstad, K., Piro, F. N., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628–636.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Berry, M (2013). Computing in the national curriculum: A guide for primary teachers, Naace & Computing at School.

• Camp, T. (1997). The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 103–110.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cavero, J. M., Vela, B., & Cáceres, P. (2014). Computer science research: More production, less productivity. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2103–2111.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America (PNAS), 108(8), 3157–3162.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 69(1–2), 58–71.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. In P. Maehr & M. W. Steinkmap (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 217–258). Greenwich: JAI Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fox, M. F., & Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 543–571.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gallivan, M. J. & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). Examining the relationship between gender and the research productivity of IS faculty. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS conference on computer personnel research ACM New York. NY, USA: ACM Press. pp. 103–113.

• Gharibyan, H. & Gunsaulus, S. (2006). Gender gap in computer science does not exist in one former Soviet republic: Results of a study. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM ITiCSE conference on innovation and technology in computer science education. ACM New York. NY, USA: ACM Press. pp. 222–226.

• Guzdial, M. (2012). U.S. Women in computing: Why isn’t it getting better? Blogs of the communications of the ACM. http://m.cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/149681-us-women-in-computing-why-isnt-it-getting-better/fulltext. Accessed 2014.

• JCR. (2010). Journal citation reports ^®. Philadelphia, PA: Thomson Reuters.

• Ley, M. (2009). DBLP: some lessons learned. PVLDB, 2(2), 1493–1500.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Ley, M., & Reuther, P. (2006). Maintaining an online bibliographical database: The problem of data quality. Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de l’Information RNTI-E-6. Cépaduès-Éditions, 2006, 5–10.

  Google Scholar 

• Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

• Mauleón, E., & Bordons, M. (2006). Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of materials science. Scientometrics, 66(1), 199–218.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McGrath Cohoon, J., Nigai, S., & Kaye, J. (2011). Gender and computing conference papers. Communications of the ACM, 54(8), 62–80.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Accessed through http://webcaspar.nsf.gov/, 2011.

• Othman, M., & Latih, R. (2006). Women in computer science: No shortage here! Communications of the ACM, 49(6), 111–114.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Papastergiou, M. (2008). Are computer science and information technology still masculine fields? High school students’ perceptions and career choices. Computers & Education, 51(2), 594–608.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• SJR. (2010). SCImago journal & country rank. http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php.

• Van Arensbergen, P., Van der Weijden, I., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Gender differences in scientific productivity: A persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics, 93(3), 857–868.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vela, B., Caceres, P., & Cavero, J. M. (2012). Participation of women in software engineering publications. Scientometrics, 93(3), 661–679.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wainer, J., Eckmann, M., Goldenstein, S., & Anderson Rocha, A. (2013). How productivity and impact differ across computer science subareas. Communications of the ACM, 56(8), 67–73.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63, 847–870.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references