Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Identify Critical Nodes in Network Cascading Failure Based on Data Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Network and Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In communication networks, the cascading failure, which is initiated by influential nodes, may cause local paralysis of communication networks and make network management systems face big challenges in both fault location and the rational use of maintenance resource. As network failure is inevitable, how to find the fragile nodes and the root cause of cascade failure has been recognized as an important research problem in both academia and industry. In this paper, we focus on the problem of identifying critical nodes when cascading failures occur in communication networks. Based on the Barabási–Albert (BA) model, which is used to generate the scale-free network, we design a reasonable global model of load redistribution for the communication network, and we also find that the betweenness centrality can accurately reflect the scale of cascading failure, and the closeness centrality is negatively correlated to the frequency of failure participation, by (1) establishing a reasonable model of fault propagation, (2) extracting and analyzing the dataset derived from the topology information. Simulation results demonstrate that our model can effectively identify critical nodes of networks and the global redistribution model is more robust than other existing models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dusia, A., Sethi, A.S.: Recent advances in fault localization in computer networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18(4), 3030–3051 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Strogatz, S.: Small-world networks. In: Lecture Notes in Physics (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0105015

  3. Barabási, A.L., Bonabeau, E.: Scale-free networks. Sci. Am. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0503-60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Enrico, Z., Giovanni, S.: Component criticality in failure cascade processes of network systems. Risk Anal. 31(8), 1196–1210 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jian, Y., Liu, E., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, C.: Scale-free model for wireless sensor networks. In: 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Shanghai, pp. 2329–2332 (2013)

  6. Sohn, I.: Small-world and scale-free network models for IoT systems. Mob. Inf. Syst. 61, 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tan, M.S.A., Ujum, E.A., Ratnavelu, K.: Social network analysis of character interaction in the Stargate and Star Trek television series. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 28, 1750017 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan, Z., Duan, W., Zhang, P., Qiu, X.: Weighted social networks for a large scale artificial society. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 30(02), 1550276 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barthelemy, M.: Betweenness centrality. Morphogenesis of Spatial Networks. Lecture Notes in Morphogenesis, pp. 51–73. Springer, Cham (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, D., Lü, L., Shang, M., Zhang, Y., Zhou, T.: Identifying influential nodes in complex networks. Phys. A 391(4), 1777–1787 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghanbari, R., Jalili, M., Yu, X.: Correlation of cascade failures and centrality measures in complex networks. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rhouma, D., Romdhane, L.B.: A new centrality measure for identifying influential nodes in social networks. In: Tenth International Conference on Machine Vision (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2309872

  13. Jiali, D., Fanghua, Y., Wuhui, C., Jiajing, W.: Identifying influential nodes in complex networks via semi-local centrality. In: 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Florence (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2018.8351889

  14. Shao, Z., Liu, S., Zhao, Y., et al.: Identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on neighbours and edges. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0681-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lalou, M., Tahraoui, M.A., Kheddouci, H.: The critical node detection problem in networks: a survey. Comput. Sci. Rev. 28, 92–117 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Duan, D., Wu, J., Deng, H., Sha, F., Wu, X., Tan, Y.: Cascading failure model of complex networks based on tunable load redistribution. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 33(1), 203–208 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Han, L., Liu, B., Deng, Y., Wang, Q., Yin, R., Liu, H.: Cascading Failure Model of Weighted Scale-Free Networks. J. Softw. 28(10), 2769–2781 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Erdos, P., Rényi, A.: On random graphs I. Publ. Math. (1959). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2006.384625

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of’small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barabasi, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghazzali, N., Ouellet, A.: Comparative Study of Centrality Measures on Social Networks. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67633-3_1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Kendall, M.: a new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30(1–2), 81–89 (1938)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schubert, E., Sander, J., Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Xu, X.: Dbscan revisited, revisited: why and how you should (still) use dbscan. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 42(3), 1–21 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos. 61877067, 61572435), Joint fund project the Ministry of Education—the China Mobile (No. MCM20170103), Xi’an Science and Technology Innovation Project (Grants No.201805029YD7CG13-6), Ningbo Natural Science Foundation (Grants Nos. 2016A610035, 2017A610119).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaogang Qi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, B., Zhang, Z., Qi, X. et al. Identify Critical Nodes in Network Cascading Failure Based on Data Analysis. J Netw Syst Manage 28, 21–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-019-09499-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-019-09499-8

Keywords

Navigation