Abstract
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) play increasingly important roles in many modern militaries. The proven success of UAS during operations in Afghanistan and Iraq has created a demand for UAS with varying functionalities and capabilities. UAS are currently performing tasks and playing roles of manned systems in many mission areas. Although UAS are limited in meeting all the required parameters when compared to the manned systems, their low risk, low cost attributes and critical mission capabilities often make them preferable. However, the extent to which UAS can continue defining tomorrow’s military missions is not predictable. There is some skepticism and hesitation about operating UAS with minimal human oversight and how it influences the operational effectiveness when the limitations of autonomy or constant control needs are accounted for. Therefore, it becomes crucially important to find out and apply the best match between systems and missions considering the type of the mission and the capabilities of UAS. The emerging challenge is to identify the place of UAS in operational structures and versatile missions, and possibly provide an integrative solution where both manned and unmanned systems collaborate in meeting given requirements in the future of warfare. The aim of this paper is to compare cognitive capabilities of manned systems and UAS, and evaluate them in the context of anticipated future operating environments. The evaluation will focus on the efficiency of systems on the cognitive domain of information environments and their impact on specific missions. The research is expected to contribute to a more informed structural transformation of modern militaries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ackerman, P.L.: Predicting Individual Differences in Complex Skill Acquisition: Dynamics of Ability Determinants. J. Appl. Psychol. 77, 598–614 (1992)
Alberts, D.S., Garstka, J.J., Stein, F.P.: Network CentricWwarfare: Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority, 2nd edn. CCRP Publication Series (1999)
Alberts, D.S., Gartska, D.S.J.J., Hayes, R.E., Signori, D.A.: Understanding Information Age Warfare. CCRP Publication Series (2001)
Bransford, J., Stein, B.: The Ideal Problem Solver (1984)
Bruning, R.H., Schraw, G.J., Norby, M.M., Ronning, R.R.: Cognitive Psychology and Instruction, 4th edn (2003)
Dombrowski, P., Gholz, E.: Buying Military Transformation, pp. 60–78, 137–148. Technological Innovation and the Defense Industry (2006)
Gompert, D.C.: Heads We Win: The Cognitive Side of Counterinsurgency. Counterinsurgency Study Occasional Paper 1, RAND Corp (2007)
Hardiman, P.T., Dufresne, R.J., Mestre, J.P.: The relation between problem categorization and problem solving among novices and experts. Mem. Cogn. 17, 627–638 (1989)
Hoffman, F.G.: Hybrid Warfare and Challenges. Joint Force Q. 52 (2009). URL http://www.ndu.edu/inss/Press/jfq_pages/editions/i52/9.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2010
Isherwood, M.W.: Airpower for Hybrid Warfare. Mitchell Institute for Airpower Studies, Mitchell Paper 3 (2009). URL http://www.afa.org/Mitchell/Reports/MP3_HybridWarfare_0609.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2010
McCarley, J.S., Wickens, C.D.: Human Factors Concerns in UAV Flight. Institute of Aviation, University of Illinois (2004). URL http://www.hf.faa.gov/docs/508/docs/uavFY04Planrpt.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2010
NATO Allied Command Transformation: Multiple Futures Project: Navigating Towards 2030. Tech. Rep. (2009)
Perkins, D.N.: Thinking Frames: An Integrated Perspective on Teaching Cognitive Skills (1987)
Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M., Broekkamp, H.: Teaching science problem-solving: an overview of experimental work. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 38, 442–468 (2001)
Taylor, R.M.: Human automation integration for supervisory control of UAVs. In: Virtual Media for Military Applications Meeting Proceedings, pp. 1–10 (2006)
Tomme, E.B.: The Paradigm Shift to Effects-Based Space: Near-Space as a Combat Space Effects Enabler. Research Paper, Airpower Research Institute (2005)
Tvaryanas, A.P., Thompson, W.T., Constable, S.H.: The U.S. Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicle experience: evidence based human systems integration lessons learned. In: Strategies to Maintain Combat Readiness during Extended Deployments-A Human Systems Approach, paper 5, pp. 1–24 (2005)
U.S. Air Force: Counterland. In: Air Force Doctrine Document 2-1.3 (1999)
U.S. Air Force: Electronic Warfare. In: Air Force Doctrine Document 2-5.1 (1999)
U.S. Department of Defense: Defense Science Board Study on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicles. Tech. Rep., Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (2004)
U.S. Department of Defense: FY 2009-2034 Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap. Tech. Rep., Office of the Secretary of Defense (2009)
U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff: Joint Doctrine for Targeting. In: Joint Publication 3-60 (2002)
U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff: Information Operations. In: Joint Publication 3-13 (2006)
U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff: Close Air Support. In: Joint Publication 3-09.3 (2009)
Watman, K.: Critical Thinking. Lecture, U.S. Naval War College (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Honoring the 100th anniversary of the Turkish Air Force.
The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Turkish Air Force, Department of Defense, or the Turkish Government. This work has been classified as “Unclassified”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurkcu, C., Erhan, H. & Umut, S. Human Factors Concerning Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Future Operations. J Intell Robot Syst 65, 63–72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-011-9592-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-011-9592-2