Setting gates for activities in the stochastic project scheduling problem through the cross entropy methodology

• Alon, G., Kroese, D. P., Raviv, T., & Rubinstein, R. Y. (2005). Application of the Cross-Entropy method to the buffer allocation problem in a simulation-based environment. Annals of Operations Research, 134, 137–151.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Botev, Z., & Kroese, D. P. (2004). Global likelihood optimization via the cross-entropy method with an application to mixture models. In R. G. Ingalls, M. D. Rossetti, J. S. Smith, & B. A. Peters (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 winter simulation conference (pp. 529–535). New York: IEEE Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Buss, A. H., & Rosenblatt, M. J. (1997). Activity delay in stochastic project networks. Operations Research, 45(1), 126–139.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, I., Golany, B., & Shtub, A. (2005). Managing stochastic, finite capacity, multi-project systems through the Cross-Entropy methodology. Annals of Operations Research, 134, 189–199.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Demeulemeester, E. L., & Herroelen, W. S. (2002). Project scheduling—a research handbook. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

  Google Scholar 

• Denardo, E. V. (1982). Dynamic programming: models and applications. New York: Prentice-Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Elmaghraby, S. E. (1977). Activity networks: project planning and control by network models. New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Elmaghraby, S. E. (2001). On the optimal release time of jobs with random processing times, with extensions to other criteria. International Journal of Production Economics, 74, 103–113.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Elmaghraby, S. E., Ferreira, A. A., & Tavares, L. V. (2000). Optimal start times under stochastic activity durations. International Journal of Production Economics, 64, 153–164.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fazar, W. (1959). Program evaluation and review technique. American Statistician, 13(2), 10.

  Google Scholar 

• Golany, B., Dar-El, E. M., & Zeev, N. (1999). Controlling shop floor operations in a multi-family, multi-cell manufacturing environment through constant work-in-process. IIE Transactions, 31, 771–781.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldratt, E. M. (1997). Critical chain. New York: North River Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Heragu, S. (1997). Facilities design. Boston: PWS Publishing Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Herroelen, W. S., & Leus, R. (2005). Project scheduling under uncertainty: survey and research potentials. European Journal of Operational Research, 165, 289–306.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Herroelen, W. S., Van Dommelen, P., & Demeulemeester, E. L. (1997). Project network models with discounted cash flows: a guided tour through recent developments. European Journal of Operational Research, 100, 97–121.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Herroelen, W. S., De-Reyck, B., & Demeulemeester, E. L. (1998). Resource-constrained project scheduling: a survey of recent developments. Computers and Operations Research, 25(4), 279–302.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kimms, A. (2001). Mathematical programming and financial objectives for scheduling projects. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

  Google Scholar 

• Kolish, R., & Padman, R. (2001). An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling. Omega, 29, 249–272.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kolish, R., Sprecher, A., & Drexl, A. (1995). Characterization and generation of a general class of resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Management Science, 41(10), 1693–1703.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Krishnamoorthy, M. (1968). Critical path method: a review. Technical Report, Michigan Univ., Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Ann-Arbor, MI, USA.

• Kroese, D. P., Rubinstein, R. Y., & Porotsky, S. (2006). The cross-entropy method for continuous multi-extremal optimization. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 8, 383–407.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Malcom, D. G., Roseboom, J. H., Clark, C. E., & Fazar, W. (1959). Apllication of a technique for research and development of program evaluation. Operations Research, 7, 646–669.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rand, G. K. (2000). Critical chain: the theory of constraints applied to project management. International Journal of Project Management, 18, 173–177.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rubinstein, R. Y., & Kroese, D. P. (2004). The Cross-Entropy method—a unified approach to combinatorial optimization, Monte-Carlo simulation, and machine learning. New York: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Shtub, A., Bard, J. F., & Globerson, S. (2005). Project management—processes, methodologies, and economics. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Sobel, M. J., Szmerekovsky, J. G., & Tilson, V. (2009). Scheduling projects with stochastic activity duration to maximize expected net present value. European Journal of Operational Research, 198(3), 697–705.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Trietsch, D. (2006a). Economically balanced criticalities for robust project scheduling and control. Working Paper, ISOM Department, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

• Trietsch, D. (2006b). Optimal feeding buffers for projects or batch supply chains by an exact generalization of the newsvendor result. International Journal of Production Research, 44, 627–637.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references