A traditional radiological workflow is compared with one based on radiology information system/picture archiving and communication system (RIS/PACS). X-ray workflow process was considered in both radiology departments. First, the study identified the main phases of the research work as follows: Process Analysis, Data Collection and Elaboration, Interpretation. Afterwards, the main steps of the whole image acquisition process were defined, and each step was divided into a number of elementary operations. Then, the time required to complete each of these was measured. Data collected were elaborated and synthesized to obtain time frequency distributions for each step and evaluation of the total time for the whole working flow. Statistical elaboration of the collected data shows that x-ray working time decreases, between 35% and 57%, when RIS/PACS is used. Detailed analysis of the whole working process allows identification of possible critical points to improve the image acquisition process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B Reneir E Siegel JA Carrino (2002) ArticleTitleWorkflow optimization: current trends and future directions J Digit Imaging 15 141–152 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-002-0022-7
BI Reiner EL Siegel (2002) ArticleTitleThe cutting edge: strategies to enhance radiologist workflow in a filmless/paperless imaging department J Digit Imaging 15 178–190 Occurrence Handle12522670 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-002-0029-0
L Lepanto (2003) ArticleTitleImpact of electronic signature on radiology report turnaround time J Digit Imaging 16 306–309 Occurrence Handle14669067 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-003-1730-3
MR Ramaswamy G Chaljub O Esch DD Fanning E Sonnenberg Particlevan (2000) ArticleTitleContinuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: advantages, disadvantages, and impact AJR 174 617–622 Occurrence Handle10701598 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7mtlGgsQ%3D%3D
E Cavagna R Berletti F Schiavon B Scarsi G Barbato (2003) ArticleTitleOptimized delivery of radiological reports: applying six sigma methodology to a radiology department Radiol Med 105 205–214
KP Andriole (2002) ArticleTitleProductivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations J Digit Imaging 15 161–169 Occurrence Handle12532253 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-002-0026-3
BI Reiner EL Siegel (2002) ArticleTitleTechnologists’ productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography AJR 179 33–37 Occurrence Handle12076899
L Palma ParticleDalla G Grisi R Cuttin A Rimondini (1999) ArticleTitleDigital vs conventional radiography: cost and revenue analysis Eur Radiol 9 1682–1692 Occurrence Handle10525891 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300050910
Tolkki O, Ahovuo J, Kauppinen T, Fyhr N, Kujala J, Parvinen P: Patient in Process, Benefits of Reduced Throughtput Time-Case HUSpacs. EuroPACS-MIR (2004), Edizioni Università di Trieste, pp 155–158, 2004
MD Ralston RM Coleman DM Beaulieu K Scrutchfield T Perkins (2004) ArticleTitleProgress toward paperless radiology in the digital environment: planning, implementation, and benefits J Digit Imaging 17 134–143 Occurrence Handle15085445 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-004-1002-x
BI Reiner EL Siegel C Flagle FJ Hooper RE Cox M Scanlon (2000) ArticleTitleEffect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services Radiology 215 163–167 Occurrence Handle10751482 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3hslWrtA%3D%3D
Acknowledgments
We (A.T. and C.M.) acknowledge funding from a grant by Provincia di Macerata (Italy). We would like to acknowledge Barbara Maceri and Giacomo Giannini for helpful discussions and support during the work and for the critical reading of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mariani, C., Tronchi, A., Oncini, L. et al. Analysis of the X-ray Work Flow in Two Diagnostic Imaging Departments With and Without a RIS/PACS System. J Digit Imaging 19 (Suppl 1), 18–28 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0858-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0858-3