Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Coverage-directed test generation using symbolic techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1166))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we present a verification methodology that integrates formal verification techniques with verification by simulation, thereby providing means for generating simulation test suites that ensure coverage. We derive the test suites by means of BDD-based symbolic techniques for describing and traversing the implementation state space. In our approach, we provide a high-level of control over the generated test suites; a powerful abstraction mechanism directs the generation procedure to specific areas, that are the focus for verification, thereby withstanding the state explosion problem. The abstraction is achieved by partitioning the implementation state variables into categories of interest. We also depart from the traditional graph-algorithmic model for conformance testing; instead, using temporal logic assertions, we can generate a test suite where the set of state sequences (paths) satisfies some temporal properties as well as guaranteeing transition coverage. Our methodology has been successfully applied to the generation of test suites for IBM PowerPC and AS/400 systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Aharon, D. Goodman, M. Levinger, Y. Lichtenstein, Y. Malka, C. Metzger, M. Molcho, and G. Shurek. Test program generation for functional verification of powerpc processors in ibm. In 32nd Design Automation Conference, DAC 95, pages 279–285, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Aho, B. Kerningham, and P. Weinberger. The AWK Programming Language. Addison-Wesley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Beer, M. Dvir, Kozitza B., Y. Lictenstein, S. Mack, W.J. Nee, Rappaport E., Schmierer Q., and Y. Zandman. VHDL Test Coverage in a BDLS/AUSSIM Environment. Technical Report 88 342 IBM Science and Technology, Haifa, Israel, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Beer, M. Yoeli, S. Ben-David, R. Gewirtzman, and D. Geist. Methodology and System for Practical Formal Verification of Reactive Hardware. In Computer Aided Verification, pages 182–193, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Beizer. Software Testing Techniques. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Benoit and D. Luckham. Validating Discrete Event Simulations Using Event Pattern Mappings. In ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, pages 414–419, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Brinksma. A theory for the derivation of tests. In S. Aggarwal and K Sabanni, editors, Protocol Specification, Testing, and Verification, HIV, pages 119–131. IFIP, North Holland, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. E. Bryant. Graph based algorithms for boolean function manipulation. IEEE Trans. on Computers, C-35, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.P. van de Burgt, J. Kroon, E. Kwast, and H.J. Wilts, the RNL Conformance Kit. In J. de Meer, L. Mackert, and W. Effelsberg, editors, Proc. of the 2nd International Workshop on Protocol Test Systems, pages 279–294. North-Holland, October 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Y.L. Chan, S. T. Vuong, and M.R. Ito. On test sequence generation for protocols. In E. Brinksma, G Scollo, and C.A. Vissers, editors, Protocol Specification, Testing, and Verification, IX, pages 119–131. IFIP, North Holland, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Chandra, V. Iyengar, D. Jameson, R. Jawalkelar, I. Nair, B. Rosen, M. Mullen, J. Yoon, R. Armoni, D. Geist, and Y. Wolfsthal. AVPGEN — A Test Case Generator for Architecture Verification. IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, 6(6), June 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Clarke, O. Grumberg, K.Mcmillan, and X. Zhao. Efficient generation of counter examples and witnesses in symbolic model checking. 32nd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, pages 427–432, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Farkas, D. Geist, and K. Holtz. SysGen Architecture Verification Program Generator User's Guide. IBM Science and Technology, Haifa, Israel, first edition, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. S. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. C. Ho, C. H. Yang, M. A. Horowitz, and D. L. Dill. Architecture validation for processors. In International Symposium of Computer Architecture 1995, pages 404–413, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. J. Holzmann. Design and Validation of Computer Protocols. Prentice Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Iwashita, S. Kowatari, T. Nakata, and F. Hirose. Automatic test program generation for pipelined processors. In International Conference on Computer Aided Design, November 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Levin, D. Lorenz, and S. Ur, A methodology for processor implementation verification. In FMCAD 96: Int. Conf. on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design, NOV 1996. to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. May, E. Silha, R. Simpson, H. Warren, eds. The PowerPC Architecture. Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. L. McMillan. The SMV System DRAFT. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. L. McMillan. Symbolic Model Checking. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. PCI Special Interests Group, Portland, OR. PCI Local Bus Specification, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Mandayam Srivas Albert Camilleri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Geist, D., Farkas, M., Landver, A., Lichtenstein, Y., Ur, S., Wolfsthal, Y. (1996). Coverage-directed test generation using symbolic techniques. In: Srivas, M., Camilleri, A. (eds) Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design. FMCAD 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1166. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0031805

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0031805

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61937-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49567-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics