Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Geometry of orientation preference map determines nonclassical receptive field properties

  • Part II: Cortical Maps and Receptive Fields
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN'97 (ICANN 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1327))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose a simple mechanism for the nonclassical receptive field property of orientation contrast sensitivity. Our model includes the long-range lateral connections linking cell populations of similar orientation preference, and the dynamics of local microcircuits which introduce a differential interaction whose sign depends on the post- and presynaptic activation. We demonstrate that the geometry of an orientation preference map determines the positions of cells sensitive for orientation contrasts, and we propose a simple statistical method to check the predictions of our model for experimentally given maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A.M. Sillito, K.L. Grieve, H.E. Jones, J. Cudeiro, and J. Davis, Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities, Nature 378, 492–496 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Ts'o, C.D. Gilbert, and T.N. Wiesel, J. Neurosci 6, 1160–1170 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.D. Gilbert and T.N. Wiesel, J. Neurosci. 9, 2432–2442 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Löwel and W. Singer, Science 255, 209 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Malach, Y. Amir, M. Harel, and A. Grinvald, PNAS 90, 10469–10473 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.A. Hirsch and C.D. Gilbert, J. Neurosci. 6, 1800–1809 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Weliky, K. Kandler, D. Fitzpatrick, and L.C. Katz, Neuron 15, 541–552 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Stemmler, M. Usher, and E. Niebur, Science 269, 1877–1880 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L.J. Toth, D.C. Somers, S.C. Rao, E.V. Todorov, D.-S. Kim, S.B. Nelson, A.G. Siapas, and M. Sur, preprint 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. U. Polat, D. Sagi, Vision Res. 7, 993–999 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.J. Knierim and D.C. van Essen, J. Neurophys. 67, 961–980 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.R. Wilson and J. Cowan, Biol. Cyb. 13, 55–80 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Ben-Yishai, R.L. Bar-Or, and H. Sompolinsky, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 92, 3844–3848 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Somers, S.B. Nelson, and M. Sur, J. Neurosci. 15, 5448–5465 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Wulfram Gerstner Alain Germond Martin Hasler Jean-Daniel Nicoud

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ernst, U., Pawelzik, K., Wolf, F., Geisel, T. (1997). Geometry of orientation preference map determines nonclassical receptive field properties. In: Gerstner, W., Germond, A., Hasler, M., Nicoud, JD. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN'97. ICANN 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1327. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020161

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020161

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63631-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69620-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics