Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Introducing dynamic constraints in B

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
B’98: Recent Advances in the Development and Use of the B Method (B 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1393))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In B, the expression of dynamic constraints is notoriously missing. In this paper, we make various proposals for introducing them. They all express, in different complementary ways, how a system is allowed to evolve. Such descriptions are independent of the proposed evolutions of the system, which are defined, as usual, by means of a number of operations. Some proof obligations are thus proposed in order to reconcile the two points of view. We have been very careful to ensure that these proposals are compatible with refinement. They are illustrated by several little examples, and a larger one. In a series of small appendices, we also give some theoretical foundations to our approach. In writing this paper, we have been heavily influenced by the pioneering works of Z. Manna and A. Pnueli [11], L. Lamport [10], R. Back [5] and M. Butler [6].

Supported by STERIA, SNCF, RATP and INRETS

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.-R. Abrial. The B-Book: Assigning Programs to Meanings. Cambridge University Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.-R. Abrial. Extending B Without Changing it (for Developing Distributed Systems). First B Conference (H. Habrias editor). Nantes (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.-R. Abrial and L. Mussat. Specification and Design of a Transmission Protocol by Successive Refinements Using B. in Mathematical Methods in Program Development Edited by M.Broy and B. Schieder. Springer-Verlag (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.R. Apt and E.-R. Olderog. Proof Rules and Transformations Dealing with Fairness. Science of Computer Programming (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.J.R. Back and R. Kurki-Suonio. Decentralization of Process Nets with Centralized Control. 2nd ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. J. Butler. Stepwise Refinement of Communicating Systems. Science of Computer Programming (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.M. Chandy and J. Misra. Parallel Program Design: A Foundation. Addison-Wesley (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. I.J. Hayes (editor). Specification Case Study. Prentice-Hall (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.A.R. Hoare. Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice-Hall (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Lamport. The Temporal Logic of Actions. SRC Report 57 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Manna and A. Pnueli. Adequate Proof Principles for Invariance and Liveness Properties of Concurrent Systems. Science of Computer Programming (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Udaya Shankar An Introduction to Assertional Reasoning for Concurrent Systems. ACM Computing Survey (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steria. Atelier B Version 3.3. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Didier Bert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abrial, J.R., Mussat, L. (1998). Introducing dynamic constraints in B. In: Bert, D. (eds) B’98: Recent Advances in the Development and Use of the B Method. B 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1393. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053357

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053357

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64405-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69769-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics