Abstract
In this paper we analyze the characteristics of communication in three different applications, FFT, Barnes and Water, on an IBM SP2. We contrast the communication using two different programming models: message-passing, MPI, and shared memory, represented by a state-of-the-art distributed virtual shared memory package, TreadMarks. We show that while communication time and busy times are comparable for small systems, the communication patterns are fundamentally different leading to poor performance for TreadMarks-based applications when the number of processors increase. This is due to the request/reply technique used in TreadMarks that results in a large fraction of very small messages. However, if the application can be tuned to reduce the impact of small message communication it is possible to achieve acceptable performance at least up to 32 nodes. Our measurements also show that TreadMarks programs tend to cause a more even network load compared to MPI programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. Amza, A.L. Cox, S. Dwarkadas, P. Keleher, H. Lu, R. Rajamony, W. Yu and W. Zwaenepoel.: Tread Marks: Shared Memory Computing on Networks of Workstations, IEEE Computer, Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 18–28, February 1996.
D. Bailey, T. Harris, W. Saphir, R vd Wijngaart, A. Woo, and M. Yarrow, The NAS Parallel Benchmarks 2.0, Report NAS-95-020, Nasa Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Ca, 94035, USA. December, 1995.
K. Gharachorloo, D. E. Lenoski, J. P. Laudon, P. Gibbons, A. Gupta, and J. L. Hennessy. Memory Consistency and Event Ordering in Scalable Shared-Memory Multiprocessors. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pp. 15–26, May 1990.
H. Lu, S. Dwarkadas, A. L. Cox, and W. Zwaenepoel, Quantifying the Performance Differences Between PVM and TreadMarks, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, Vol.43, No. 2, pp. 65–78, June 1997.
Message Passing Interface Forum, MPI: A Message-Passing Interface Standard, version 1.1, June 12, 1995.
J. Miguel, A. Arruabarrena, R. Beivide and J. A. Gregorio, Assessing the Performance of the New IBM SPS Communication Subsystem, IEEE Parallel & Distributed Technology, Winter 1996, pp. 12–22.
J. P. Singh, W.-D. Weber, and A. Gupta. SPLASH: Stanford parallel applications for shared-memory. Computer Architecture News, 20(1):5–44, March 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Karlsson, S., Brorsson, M. (1998). A comparative characterization of communication patterns in applications using MPI and shared memory on an IBM SP2. In: Panda, D.K., Stunkel, C.B. (eds) Network-Based Parallel Computing Communication, Architecture, and Applications. CANPC 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1362. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052217
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052217
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64140-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69693-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive