Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The schema deceptiveness and deceptive problems of genetic algorithms

  • Scientific Papers
  • Published:
Science in China Series : Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic algorithms (GA) are a new type of global optimization methodology based on nature selection and heredity, and its power comes from the evolution process of the population of feasible solutions by using simple genetic operators. The past two decades saw a lot of successful industrial cases of GA application, and also revealed the urgency of practical theoretic guidance. This paper sets focus on the evolution dynamics of GA based on schema theorem and building block hypothesis (Schema Theory), which we thought would form the basis of profound theory of GA. The deceptiveness of GA in solving multi-modal optimization problems encoded on {0,1} was probed in detail. First, a series of new concepts are defined mathematically as the schemata containment, schemata competence. Then, we defined the schema deceptiveness and GA deceptive problems based on primary schemata competence, including fully deceptive problem, consistently deceptive problem, chronically deceptive problem, and fundamentally deceptive problem. Meanwhile, some novel propositions are formed on the basis of primary schemata competence. Finally, we use the trap function, a kind of bit unitation function, and a NiH function (needle-in-a-haystack) newly designed by the authors, to display the affections of schema deceptiveness on the searching behavior of GA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belew, R. K., Vose, M. D., Foundation of Genetic Algorithms, 4, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell, M., An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bethke, A. D., Genetic algorithm as function optimizers, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, 1980.

  4. Goldberg, D. E., Simple genetic algorithm and the minimal deceptive problem, in Genetic Algorithms and Simulatied Annealing (ed. Davis, L.), San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman, 1987, 74–88.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Das, R, Whitley, D., The only challenging problems are deceptive: global search by solving order-1 hyperplanes, Proceedings of ICGA (eds. Belew, R., Booker, L.), San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman, 1991, 166–173.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whitley, D., Fundamental principles of deception in genetic search, in Foundations of Genetic Algorithms (ed. Rawlins, G.), San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1991, 221–241.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deb, K., Goldberg, D. E., Analyzing deception in trap functions, IlliGAL Report No.91009, Urbana: University of Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liepins, G. E., Vose, M. D., Representational issues in genetic optimization, Journal of Experimental Theory and Instruments, 1990,(2): 4–30.

  9. Goldberg, D. E., Korb, B., Deb, K., Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results, Complex Systems, 1989, (3): 493–530.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Minqiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, M., Kou, J. The schema deceptiveness and deceptive problems of genetic algorithms. Sci China Ser F 44, 342–350 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02714737

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02714737

Keywords

Navigation