Effects of text illustrations: A review of research

• Alesandrini, K. L. Pictorial-verbal and analyticholistic learning strategies in science learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981,73, 358–368.

  Google Scholar 

• Alvermann, D. E.The compensatory effect of graphic organizer instruction on text structure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April 1981.

• Anderson, R. C., & Kulhavy, R. W. Imagery and prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972,63, 242–243.

  Google Scholar 

• Arlin, M., Scott, M., & Webster, J. The effects of pictures on rate of learning sight words: A critique of the focal attention hypothesis.Reading Research Quarterly, 1978-1979,14, 645–657.

  Google Scholar 

• Arnold, D. J., & Brooks, P. H. Influence of contextual organizing material on children’s listening comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,68, 711–716.

  Google Scholar 

• Arnold, T. C., & Dwyer, F. M. Realism in visualized instruction.Perception and Motor Skills, 1975,40, 369–370.

  Google Scholar 

• Bahrick, H. P., & Gharrity, K. Interaction among pictorial components in the recall of picture captions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 103–111.

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, E. L., & Popham, W. J. Value of pictorial embellishments in a tape-slide instructional program.AV Communication Review, 1965,13, 397–404.

  Google Scholar 

• Barron, R. F.A systematic research procedure, organizers, and overviews: A historical perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, December 1980.

• Bartram, D. J. Comprehending spatial information: The relative efficiency of different methods of presenting information about bus routes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980,65, 103–110.

  Google Scholar 

• Baxter, W. S., Quarles, R., & Kodak, H.The effects of photographs and their size on reading and recall of news stories. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism, Seattle, August 1978. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 159 722)

• Bernard, R. M., Petersen, C. H., & Ally, M. Can images provide contextual support for prose?Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1981,29, 101–108.

  Google Scholar 

• Bevan, W., and Feuer, J. N. The facilitative role of imagery in episodic memory: Multiple cues or active construction?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977,10, 172–174.

  Google Scholar 

• Bluth, L. F.A comparison of the reading comprehension of good and poor readers in the second grade with and without illustration. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1972. (University Microfilms No. 73-17, 122)

• Bock, M. Levels of processing of normal and ambiguous sentences in different contexts.Psychological Research, 1978,40, 37–51.

  Google Scholar 

• Bock, M., & Milz, B. Pictorial context and the recall of pronoun sentences.Psychological Research, 1977,39, 203–220.

  Google Scholar 

• Booher, H. R. Relative comprehensibility of pictorial information and printed words in proceduralized instructions.Human Factors, 1975,17, 266–277.

  Google Scholar 

• Bransford, J. D.Human cognition. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing, 1979.

  Google Scholar 

• Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 717–726.

  Google Scholar 

• Braun, C. Interest-loading and modality effects on textual response acquisition.Reading Research Quarterly, 1969,4, 428–444.

  Google Scholar 

• Brody, P. J. Research on pictures in instructional texts: The need for a broadened perspective.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1981,29, 93–100.

  Google Scholar 

• Brody, P. J., & Legenza, A. Can pictorial attributes serve mathemagenic functions?Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1980,28, 25–29.

  Google Scholar 

• Brooks, P. R.The influence of pictures, context and difficulty on beginning reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, 1977.

• Bryant, J., Brown, D., Silberberg, A., & Elliot, S. M.Humorous illustrations in textbooks: Effects on information acquisition, appeal, persuasibility and motivation. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, New York, November 1980. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 196 071)

• Bull, B. L., & Wittrock, M. C. Imagery in the learning of verbal definitions.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973,43, 289–293.

  Google Scholar 

• Byram, M., & Garforth, C. Research and testing non-formal education materials: A multimedia extension program in Botswana.Educational Television International, December 1980, 190–194.

• Carr, T. H., Bacharach, V. R., & Mehner, D. S. Preparing children to look at pictures: Advance descriptions direct attention and facilitate active processing.Child Development, 1977,48, 22–29.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, F. E., & Angert, J. F.Ameta-analytic study of pictorial stimulus complexity. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Denver, April 1980. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 196 405)

• Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Braddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.

  Google Scholar 

• Cole, J. N. The effects of non-prose textual characteristics on retention of major concepts and supporting details with and without specific instruction in their use. In P. D. Peterson (Ed.),Reading: Theory, research, and practice (26th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference). Clemson, S.C.: National Reading Conference, Inc., 1977.

  Google Scholar 

• Concannon, S. J. Illustrations in books for children: Review of research.Reading Teacher, 1975,29, 254–256.

  Google Scholar 

• Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,26, 274–284.

  Google Scholar 

• Dana, C. M.The effects of using a graphic advance organizer before, during, and after reading on the comprehension of written text: A study conducted with sixth-grade students. Madison: University of Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling, 1980. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 193 606)

  Google Scholar 

• Dean, R. S., & Kulhavy, R. W. Influence of spatial organization in prose learning,foumal of Educational Psychology, 1981,76, 57–61.

  Google Scholar 

• de Melo, H. T.Visual self-paced instruction and visual testing in biological science at the secondary level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1980.

• Denberg, S. D. The interaction of picture and print in reading instruction (abstracted report).Reading Research Quarterly, 1976-1977,12, 176–189.

  Google Scholar 

• DeRose, T.The effects of verbally and pictorially induced and imposed strategies on children’s memory for text. Madison: University of Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, 1976. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 133 709)

  Google Scholar 

• Duchastel, P., & Waller, R. Pictorial illustration in instructional texts.Educational Technology, November 1979,19, 20–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Dunham, T. C., & Levin, J. R. Imagery instructions and young children’s prose learning: No evidence of “support.”Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1979,4, 107–113.

  Google Scholar 

• Dwyer, F. M. The relative effectiveness of varied visual illustrations in complementing programmed instruction.The Journal of Experimental Education, 1967,36, 34–42.

  Google Scholar 

• Dwyer, F. M. The effectiveness of visual illustrations used to complement programmed instruction.Journal of Psychology, 1968,70, 157–162.

  Google Scholar 

• Dwyer, F. M. The effect of varying the amount of realistic detail in visual illustrations designed to complement programmed instruction.Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1969,6, 147–153.

  Google Scholar 

• Dwyer, F. M. The effect of overt responses in improving visually programmed science instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1972,9, 47–55.

  Google Scholar 

• Dwyer, F. M. On visualized instruction: Effect of students’ entering behavior.Journal of Experimental Education, 1975,43, 78–83.

  Google Scholar 

• Dwyer, F. M.Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, Pa.: Learning Services, 1978.

  Google Scholar 

• Englander, M., & Harste, J.Cue system utilization among beginning readers. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1979.

• EPIE Institute.Selector’s guide for elementary language arts programs. Stony Brook, N.Y.: Author, 1981.

  Google Scholar 

• Evans, T., & Denny, M. R. Emotionality of pictures and the retention of related and unrelated phrases.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978,11, 149–152.

  Google Scholar 

• Findahl, O.The effect of visual illustrations upon perception and retention of news programmes. Stockholm: Swedish Broadcasting Corporation, 1971. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 054 631)

  Google Scholar 

• Fleming, M. L. Classification and analysis of instructional illustrations.AV Communication Review, 1967,15, 246–256.

  Google Scholar 

• Freisinger, S. D.The effect of cartoon-embellished programmed textual instruction on students’ learning and affective learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, Calif., March–April 1976. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 128 008)

• Friedman, A. Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1979,208, 316–355.

  Google Scholar 

• Gambrell, L. B., Koskinen, P. S., & Cole, J. N.The effects of induced mental imagery upon comprehension: A comparison of written versus oral presentation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, December 1980.

• Garrison, W. T.The context bound effects of picture-text amalgams: Two studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1978.

• Goldberg, F. Effects of imagery on learning incidental material in the classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 233–237.

  Google Scholar 

• Goodykoontz, B. The relation of pictures to reading comprehension.Elementary English Review, 1936,13, 125–130.

  Google Scholar 

• Gustafsson, J. E. Differential effects of imagery instructions on pupils with different abilities.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1978,21, 157–179.

  Google Scholar 

• Hagen, M. A., & Jones, R. K. Cultural effects of pictorial perception: How many words is one picture really worth? In R. D. Walk & H. L. Pick, Jr. (Eds.),Perception and experience. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.

  Google Scholar 

• Halbert, M. G. An experimental study of children’s understanding of instructional materials.Bulletin of the Bureau of School Service (University of Kentucky, College of Education), 1943, 25(4).

• Haring, M.J. Picture enrichment of delayed recall: Support from a unique source. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Phoenix, November 1979.

• Haring, M. J., & Fry, M. A. Effect of pictures on children’s comprehension of written text.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1979,27, 185–190.

  Google Scholar 

• Harzern, P., Lee, I., & Miles, T. R. The effects of learning to read.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,46, 318–322.

  Google Scholar 

• Holliday, W. G. The effects of verbal and adjunct pictorial-verbal information in science instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1975,22, 77–83.

  Google Scholar 

• Holliday, W. G. Conceptualizing and evaluating learner aptitudes related to instructional stimuli in science education.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976,13, 101–109. (a)

  Google Scholar 

• Holliday, W. G. Teaching verbal chains using flow diagrams and texts.AV Communication Review, 1976,24, 63–78. (b)

  Google Scholar 

• Holliday, W. G., Brunner, L. L., & Donais, E. L. Differential cognitive and affective responses to flow diagrams in science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1977,14, 129–138.

  Google Scholar 

• Holliday, W. G., & Harvey, D. A. Adjunct labeled drawings in teaching physics to junior high school students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976,13, 37–43.

  Google Scholar 

• Holliday, W. G., & Thursby, P. MTeaching visual concepts in the classroom. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Miami, April 1977.

• Hughes, L. H., Langdon, C. A., & Kim, Y. S.Comprehension of discourse at high rates with redundant pictures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia, November 1981.

• Ibison, R. A.Differential effects in the recall of textual materials associated with the inclusion of colored and uncolored illustrations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1951.

• Jagodzinska, M. The role of illustrations in verbal learning.Polish Psychological Bulletin, 1976,7, 95–104.

  Google Scholar 

• Jahoda, G., Cheyne, W. M., Deregowski, J. B., Sinha, D., & Collingbourne, R. Utilization of pictorial information in classroom learning: A cross cultural study.AV Communication Review, 1976,24, 295–315.

  Google Scholar 

• Joseph, J. H.The instructional effectiveness of integrating abstract and realistic visualization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1978.

• Kennedy, J. M.A psychology of picture perception. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

  Google Scholar 

• Knowlton, J. Q. On the definition of “picture.”AV Communication Review, 1966,14, 157–183.

  Google Scholar 

• Koenke, K., & Otto, W. Contribution of pictures to children’s comprehension of the main idea in reading.Psychology in the Schools, 1969,6, 298–302.

  Google Scholar 

• Koran, M. L., & Koran, J. J. Interaction of learner characteristics with pictorial adjuncts in learning from science text.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1980,27, 477–483.

  Google Scholar 

• Kulhavy, R. W., & Swenson, I. Imagery instructions and the comprehension of text.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,45, 47–51.

  Google Scholar 

• Lang, R. J., & Solman, R. T. Effect of pictures on learning to read common nouns.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979,49, 138–149.

  Google Scholar 

• Lesgold, A. M., Levin, J. R., Shimron, J., & Guttmann, J. Pictures and young children’s learning from oral prose.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 636–642.

  Google Scholar 

• Lesgold, A. M., McCormick, C., & Golinkoff, R. M. Imagery training and children’s prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 663–667.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, J. R. Inducing comprehension in poor readers: A test of a recent model.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973,65, 19–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, J. R. On functions of pictures in prose. In F. J. Pirozzolo & M. C. Wittrock (Eds.),Neurophysiological and cognitive processes in reading. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, J. R., Bender, B. G., & Lesgold, A. M. Pictures, repetition, and young children’s oral prose learning.AV Communication Review, 1976,24, 367–380.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, J. R., & Berry, J. K. Children’s learning of all the news that’s fit to picture.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1980,28, 177–185.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, J. R., & Divine-Hawkins, P. Visual imagery as a prose-learning process.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1974,6, 23–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, J. R., Divine-Hawkins, P., Kerst, S. M., & Guttmann, J. Individual differences in learning from pictures and words: The development and application of an instrument.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 296–303.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, J. R., & Lesgold, A. M. On pictures in prose.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1978,26, 233–243.

  Google Scholar 

• Litcher, J., & Johnson, D. Changes in attitudes toward Negroes and white elementary school students after use of multi-ethnic readers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969,60, 148–152.

  Google Scholar 

• Maher, J., & Sullivan, H.Differential effects of imagery and stimulus form on prose learning of fourth and sixth graders. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April 1981.

• Miller, W. A. Reading with and without pictures.Elementary School Journal, 1938,38, 676–682.

  Google Scholar 

• Montare, A., Elman, E., & Cohen, J. Words and pictures: A test of Samuels’ findings.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1977,9, 269–285.

  Google Scholar 

• Moore, A. M.Investigation of the effect of patterns of illustrations on third graders’ comprehension of information. Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 1975. (University Microfilms No. 75-20, 604)

• Moore, D. W., & Readence, J. E.A meta-anatysis of graphic organizers on learning from text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, December 1979.

• Nahinsky, I. D., & Oeschger, D. E. The influence of specific stimulus information on the concept learning process.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,1, 660–670.

  Google Scholar 

• Olson, D. R. The languages of instruction: The literate bias of schooling. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.

  Google Scholar 

• Optical Society of America, Committee on Colorimetry.The science of color. New York: Crowell, 1953.

  Google Scholar 

• Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, 1971.

  Google Scholar 

• Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. Concrete image and verbal memory codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,80, 279–285.

  Google Scholar 

• Paradowski, W. Effect of curiosity on incidental learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967,58, 50–55.

  Google Scholar 

• Parish, T. S., Bryant, W. T., & Prawat, R. S. Reversing effects of sexism in elementary school girls through counterconditioning.Journal of Instructional Psychology, 19774(4), 11–16.

  Google Scholar 

• Parkhurst, P. E.Assessing the effectiveness of selfpaced visualized instruction: A multifactor analysis on five different educational tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1974.

• Peeck, J. Retention of pictorial and verbal content of a text with illustrations.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 880–888.

  Google Scholar 

• Peeck,J. Experimenter-provided and learner-generated pictures in learning from text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 1980.

• Pepper, J. Following students’ suggestions for rewriting a computer programming textbook.American Educational Research Journal, 1981,18, 259–269.

  Google Scholar 

• Phillips, R. J. Making maps easy to read-A summary of research. In P. A. Koler, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Processing of visible language (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press, 1979.

  Google Scholar 

• Pierce, J. W. Field independence and imageryassisted prose recall of children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980,72, 200–203.

  Google Scholar 

• Pillemer, D. B., & Light, R. J. Synthesizing outcomes: How to use research evidence from many studies.Harvard Educational Review, 1980,50, 176–195.

  Google Scholar 

• Popham, W. J. Pictorial embellishments in a tape-slide instructional program.AV Communication Review, 1969,17, 28–35.

  Google Scholar 

• Potash, L. M. Design of maps and map-related research.Human Factors, 1977,19, 139–150.

  Google Scholar 

• Pressley, M. Mental imagery helps eight-yearolds remember what they read.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,68, 355–359.

  Google Scholar 

• Pressley, M. Imagery and children’s learning: Putting the picture in developmental perspective.Review of Educational Research, 1977,47, 585–622.

  Google Scholar 

• Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Hope, D.J. Do mismatched pictures interfere with children’s memory of prose? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April 1981.

• Purkel, W., & Bornstein, M. H. Pictures and imagery both enhance children’s short-term and long-term recall.Developmental Psychology, 1980,16, 153–154.

  Google Scholar 

• Rankin, E. F., & Culhane, J. W. One picture equals 1,000 words?Reading Improvement, 1970,7(2), 37–40.

  Google Scholar 

• Rasco, R. W., Tennyson, R. D., & Boutwell, R. C. Imagery instructions and drawings in learning prose.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 188–192.

  Google Scholar 

• Readence, J. E., & Moore, D. W.A meta-analysis of research on the effect of adjunct aids on learning from text. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 1980.

• Rigney, J. W., & Lutz, K. A. Effect of graphic analogies of concepts in chemistry on learning and attitude.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,68, 305–311.

  Google Scholar 

• Rohwer, W. D., Jr., & Harris, W. J. Media effects on prose learning in two populations of children,Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 651–657.

  Google Scholar 

• Royer, J. M., & Cable, G. W. Illustrations, analogies, and facultative transfer in prose learning,Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,68, 205–209.

  Google Scholar 

• Ruch, M. D., & Levin, J. R. Pictorial organization versus verbal repetition of children’s prose: Evidence for processing differences.AV Communication Review, 1977,25, 269–280.

  Google Scholar 

• Ruch, M. D., & Levin, J. R. Partial pictures and imagery-retrieval cues in young children’s prose recall.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1979,28, 268–279.

  Google Scholar 

• Rudolph, H. J.Attention and interest factors in advertising. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1947.

  Google Scholar 

• Rusted, J., & Coltheart, M. Facilitation of children’s prose recall by the presence of pictures.Memory and Cognition, 1979,7, 354–359.

  Google Scholar 

• Rusted, J., & Coltheart, V. The effect of pictures on the retention of novel words and prose passages.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1979,28, 516–524.

  Google Scholar 

• Samuels, S. J. Attentional processes in reading: The effect of pictures in the acquisition of reading responses.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967,58, 337–342.

  Google Scholar 

• Samuels, S. J. Effects of pictures on learning to read, comprehension and attitudes.Review of Educational Research, 1970,40, 397–407.

  Google Scholar 

• Samuels, S. J., Biesbrock, E., & Terry, P. R. The effect of pictures on children’s attitudes toward presented stories.The Journal of Educational Research, 1974,67, 243–246.

  Google Scholar 

• Schallert, D. L. The role of illustrations in reading comprehension. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1980.

  Google Scholar 

• Schwartz, N. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. Map features and the recall of discourse.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1981,6, 151–158.

  Google Scholar 

• Sewell, E. H., Jr., & Moore, R. L. Cartoon embellishments in informative presentations.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1980,28, 39–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Sherman, J. L. Contextual information and prose comprehension.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1976,8, 369–379.

  Google Scholar 

• Singer, H., Samuels, S. J., & Spiroff, J. The effect of pictures and contextual conditions on learning responses to printed words.Reading Research Quarterly, 1973-1974,9, 555–567.

  Google Scholar 

• Small, M. Y., Dowling, S. B., & Lovett, S. B.Semantic elaboration and children’s recall of picture and prose information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April 1981.

• Snowman, J., & Cunningham, D. J. A comparison of pictorial and written adjunct aids in learning from text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 307–311.

  Google Scholar 

• Steingart, S. K., & Glock, M. D. Imagery and the recall of connected discourse.Reading Research Quarterly, 1979,15, 66–82.

  Google Scholar 

• Stone, D. E., & Glock, M. D. How do young adults read directions with and without pictures?Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981,73, 419–426.

  Google Scholar 

• Stromnes, F. J., & Nyman, J. Immediate and long-term retention of connected concrete discourse as a function of mnemonic picture-type sequence and context.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1974,15, 197–202.

  Google Scholar 

• Tennyson, R. D. Pictorial support and specific instructions as design variables for children’s concept and rule learning.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1978,26, 291–299.

  Google Scholar 

• Thomas, J. L.The influence of pictorial illustrations with written text and previous achievement on the reading comprehension of fourth grade science students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, 1977. (Shorter version inJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1978,15, 401–405.)

• Thomas, J. L.The influence of pictures with written text and achievement on reading comprehension of elementary students. Unpublished manuscript, North Texas State University, School of Library & Information Sciences, 1978.

• Tirre, W. C., Manelis, L., & Leicht, K. L. The effects of imaginai and verbal strategies on prose comprehension by adults.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1979,11, 99–106.

  Google Scholar 

• Ude, C. K.The effect over time of pictures on the acquisition of similar and dissimilar sight words by prereaders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University, 1977.

• University of Illinois, Division of Communications.How pictures and graphs aid learning from print: A review of the research evidence. Technical Memorandum No. 4 to the U.S. Air Force Human Resources Research Institute, December 1952.

• Vernon, M. D. The value of pictorial illustration.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1953,23, 180–187.

  Google Scholar 

• Vernon, M. D. The instruction of children by pictorial illustration.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1954,24, 171–179.

  Google Scholar 

• Waldner, D. N.The effect of pictures on the story comprehension and retention of good and poor readers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, 1978. (University Microfilms No. 7910670)

• Wardle, K. F.Textbook illustrations: Do they aid reading comprehension? Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, 1977.

• Weintraub, S.The effect of pictures on the comprehension of second grade basal readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1960.

• Weisberg, J. S. The use of visual advance organizers for learning earth science concepts.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1970,7, 161–165.

  Google Scholar 

• Whalley, P. C., & Fleming, R. W. An experiment with a simple recorder of reading behavior.Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1975,11, 120–123.

  Google Scholar 

• Williams, C. M.Learning from pictures. Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1968.

  Google Scholar 

• Willows, D. M. Individual differences in distraction by pictures in a reading situation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978,70, 837–847. (a)

  Google Scholar 

• Willows, D. M. A picture is not always worth a thousand words: Pictures as distractors in reading.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978,70, 255–262. (b)

  Google Scholar 

• Willows, D. M.Reading comprehension of illustrated and non-illustrated aspects of text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1979.

• Willows, D. M.Effects of picture salience on reading comprehension of illustrated and non-illustrated aspects of text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 1980.

• Willows, D. M., Borwick, D., & Hayvren, M. The contents of readers. In T. G. Waller & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1981.

  Google Scholar 

• Winn, W. Effect of attribute highlighting and diagrammatic organization on identification and classification.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1981,18, 23–32.

  Google Scholar 

• Winn, W. D., & Holliday, W. G.Learning from diagrams: Theoretical and instructional considerations. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Philadelphia, April 1981.

• Yarbus, A. L.Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press, 1967.

  Google Scholar 

Download references