Media will never influence learning

• Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, R. E. (1985a). Confounding in educational computing research.Journal of Educational Computing Research.1(2), 445–460.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, R. E. (1985b). The importance of treatment explication in computer-based instruction research.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(3), 389–394.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, R. E. (1985c). Evidence for confounding in computer-based instruction studies: Analyzing the meta analyses.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 33(4).

• Clark, R. E. (1986). Absolutes and angst in educational technology research: A reply to Don Cunningham.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 34(1), 8–10.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, R. E. (1987). Which technology for what purpose. Paper presented at an invited symposium for the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Atlanta, GA.

• Clark, R. E. & Salomon, G. (1986). Media in teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching, Third Edition, New York: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, R. E. and Sugrue, B. M. (1988). Research on instructional media, 1978–1988. In D. Ely (Ed.),Educational Media Yearbook 1987–88. Littletown, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

  Google Scholar 

• Cunningham, D. J. (1986). Good guys and bad guys.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 34(1), 3–7.

  Google Scholar 

• Gick, M. & Holyoak, K, (1987). Cognitive Basis of Knowledge Transfer, In S.M. Cormier and S. D. Hagman (Eds.),Transfer of Learning. NY: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media.Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–212.

  Google Scholar 

• Kozma, R. B. (1993). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Paper presented at the International Meeting of the EARLI, Aix en Provence, September 1993.

• Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate.Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(2), 7–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Kulik, J. A. (1985). The importance of outcome studies: A reply to Clark.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 34(1), 381–386.

  Google Scholar 

• Levie, W.H. & Dickie, K.E. (1973). The analysis and application of media. In Travers, R.M.W. (Ed.),Second Handbook of Research on Teaching, Chicago: Rand McNally.

  Google Scholar 

• Lumsdaine, A. A. (1963). Instruments and Media of Instruction. In N. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching, Chicago: Rand McNally.

  Google Scholar 

• Mielke, K. W. (1968). Questioning the questions of ETV research.Educational Broadcasting Review, 2, 6–15.

  Google Scholar 

• Petkovich, M. D. & Tennyson, R. (1984). Clark's “Learning from media”: A critique.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 32(4), 233–241.

  Google Scholar 

• Salomon, G (1979),Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Salomon, G. (1984). Television is easy and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647–658.

  Google Scholar 

• Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., and Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies.Educational Researcher, 20(2), 2–9.

  Google Scholar 

• Schramm, W. (1977).Big media, little media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Winn, W. (1990). Media and instructional methods. In R. Ganisan, and D. Shue (Eds.),Education at a Distance. Malabu, FL: Krieger.

  Google Scholar 

Download references