Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators

1. Theocritus,Idylls

2. W. Shakespeare,Much Ado about Nothing, iii, 5, 18

3. A. Schubert, T. Braun, Reference standards for citation based assessments,Scientometrics, 26 (1993) 21.

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. E. Garfield,Citation Indexing. Its Theory and Applications in Science, Technology, and Humanities, Wiley, New York, 1979.

   Google Scholar 

5. G. Pinski,Subject Classification and Influence Weight of 2300 Journals, Computer Horizons, Inc., Cherry Hill, 1975.

   Google Scholar 

6. T. Braun, M. Brocken, W. Glänzel, E. Rinia, A. Schubert, “Hyphenation” of databases in building scientometric indicators. Physics Briefs-SCI based indicators of 13 European countries, 1980–1989,Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 131.

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. J. D. Frame, Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean,Interciencia, 2 (1977) 143.

   Google Scholar 

8. A. Schubert, T. Braun, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 281.

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. M. M. Kessler, Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers,American Documentation, 14 (1963) 10.

   Google Scholar 

10. R. Todorov, W. Glänzel, Journal citation measures: A concise review,Journal of Information Science, 14 (1988) 47.

    Google Scholar 

11. E. Garfield (Ed.),Science Citation Index, Journal Citation Reports. A Bibliometric Analysis of Science Journals in the ISI Database, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA, USA, from 1975 annually. From 1995 also available on CD-ROM.

12. D. J. de Solla Price,Little Science — Big Science. Columbia University Press, New York, 4th ed., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

13. W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Price distribution. An exact formulation of Price's “Square Root Law”,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Subject field characteristic scores and scales for assessing research performance,Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation impact,Journal of Information Science, 14 (1988) 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

16. A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, A dynamic look at a class of skew distributions. A model with scientometric applications,Scientometrics, 6 (1984) 149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, Prompt nuclear analysis literature. A cumulative advantage approach,Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, A, 82 (1984) 215.

    Google Scholar 

18. A. Schubert, A. Telcs, Estimation of the publication potential in 50 US states and in the District of Columbia based on the frequency distribution of scientific productivity,Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 40 (1989) 291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. A. Telcs, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Characterization and statistical test using truncated expectations for a class of skew distributions,Mathematical Social Sciences, 10 (1985) 169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. A. Schubert, T. Braun, W. Glänzel, Scientometric datafiles,Scientometrics, 16 (1989) 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. T. Braun, A. Schubert, Indicators of research output in the sciences from 5 Central European countries, 1990–1994. In:Basic Sciences for Development: Subregional Opportunities and Challenges (Central Europe) UNESCO meeting held at Keszthely (Hungary), January 1996.

Download references