Knowledge and best responses in games

1. M. Allias, The foundations of positive theory of choice involving risk and a criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American School, in:Expected Utility and the Allias Paradox, ed. M. Allias and O. Hagen (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979).

   Google Scholar 

2. S. Ambroszkiewicz, Mutual knowledge, in:Proc. Int. Symp. on Methodologies of Intelligent Systems, Trondheim, Norway, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Springer, 1993).

3. R.J. Aumann, Agreeing to disagree, Ann. Statist. 4(1976)1236–1239.

   Google Scholar 

4. D. Bernheim, Rationalizable strategic behavior, Econometrica 52(1984)1007–1028.

   Google Scholar 

5. D. Bernheim, Axiomatic characterization of tational choice in strategic environments, Scand. J. Econ. 88(1986)473–488.

   Google Scholar 

6. A. Brandenburger and E. Deckel, Rationalizability and correlated equilibria, Econometrica 55(1987)1391–1402.

   Google Scholar 

7. J.Y. Halpern and Y.O. Moses, Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment, J. ACM 37(1990)549–587.

   Google Scholar 

8. P. Milgrom and J. Roberts, Razionalizability, learning and equilibrium in games with strategic complementaries, Econometrica 58(1990)1255–1277.

   Google Scholar 

9. P. Milgrom and J. Roberts, Adaptive and sophisticated learning in repeated normal form games, Games Econ. Behavior 3(1991).

10. D.G. Pearce, Rationalizable strategic behavior and the problem of perfection, Econometrica 52(1984)1029–1050.

    Google Scholar 

11. T. Tan and S. Werlang, The Bayesian foundations of solution concepts of games, J. Econ. Theory 45(1988)370–391

    Google Scholar 

12. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Rational choice and the framing of decisions, J. Business 59(1986)251–273.

    Google Scholar 

13. L. Samuelson, Dominated strategies and common knowledge, Games Econ. Behavior 4(1992)284–313.

    Google Scholar 

Download references