Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Algorithms for reducing rollbacks in concurrency control by certification

  • Part I Computer Science
  • Published:
BIT Numerical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present concurrency control schemes, based on the optimistic approach, which aim at reducing the rate of rollbacks, tolerating higher degrees of conflict among transactions, and allowing more concurrency at the update phase. Both the single site and fully duplicated database networks are considered. Performance results of the proposed approach are presented. The protocols offer a good tool to improve the throughput of optimistic concurrency control methods and to widen their scope of applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Bernstein, D. Shipman and B. Rothnie,Concurrency and control in a system for distributed database, ACM TODS, Vol. 5, No. 1, March 1980, pp. 18–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Bernstein and N. Goodman,Concurrency control in distributed database systems, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 13, No. 2, June 1981, pp. 185–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Bernstein, V. Hadzilacos and N. Goodman,Concurrency Control and Recovery in Database Systems, Addison-Wesley, 1987.

  4. H. Boral and I. Gold,Towards a self adapting centralized concurrency control algorithm, ACM SIGMOD, Boston, MA, June 1984, pp. 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Carey,Modeling and evaluation of concurrency control algorithms, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 1983.

  6. M. Carey and M. Stonebraker,The performance of concurrency control algorithms for database management systems, Proc. VLDB, 1984, pp. 107–118.

  7. W. Cheng and G. Belford,Update synchronization in distributed databases, Proceedings VLDB, 1980, pp. 301–308.

  8. K. Eswaran, J. Gray, R. Lorie and I. Traiger,The notions of consistency and predicate locks in a database system, CACM, Vol. 19, No. 11, Nov. 76, pp. 624–633.

  9. H. Kung and J. Robinson,On optimistic methods for concurrency control, ACM TODS, Vol. 6, No. 2, June 1981, pp. 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Lin and J. Nolte,Basic timestamp, multiple version timestamp, and two-phase locking, VLDB, Florence, Italy, Oct. 1983, pp. 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Peinl and A. Reuter,Empirical comparison of database concurrency control schemes, VLDB, Florence, Italy, Oct. 1983, pp. 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Reimer,Solving the phantom problem by predicative optimistic concurrency control, VLDB, Florence, Italy, 1983, pp. 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Schlageter,Optimistic methods for concurrency control in distributed database systems, VLDB, Cannes, France, Sept. 1981, pp. 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Silberschatz and Z. Kedem,A family of locking protocols for database systems that are modeled by directed graphs, IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, Vol. SE-8, No. 6, Nov. 1982.

  15. R. Thomas,A majority consensus approach to concurrency control, ACM TODS, Vol. 4, No. 2, June 1979, pp. 180–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bassiouni, M.A., Khamare, U. Algorithms for reducing rollbacks in concurrency control by certification. BIT 27, 441–457 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01937270

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01937270

CR Categories

Keywords

Navigation